Ridgeway Unified Courts

JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF RIDGEWAY

Searchable full text

13,981 characters extracted

—

OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS Superior Court of the State of Ridgeway Category: Judge AlbertWellesly's Docket #takosull0-v-larkin-rblx Archive Window: Aug 19, 2026, 10:37:41 PM UTC – Oct 2, 2026, 01:44:29 PM UTC Total Messages: 60 Timezone: UTC Message Log [0001] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 19, 2026, 10:37:41 PM UTC Embedded content: Case: RSC-CV-8446 takosull0 v. Larkin_RBLX Plaintiff(s): takosull0 Defendant(s): larkin_rblx Type: CIVIL Court: SUPERIOR Status: ACTIVE Presiding Judge: Unassigned Case Link: [View on RW Courts](https://rwcourts.org/public-case/RSC-CV-8446) RW Courts • live case record [0002] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 19, 2026, 10:37:43 PM UTC Embedded content: Procedural Notice — Preservation and Deadlines Duty to preserve (Rule 26(7)): The duty to preserve documents, communications, and electronically stored information has attached. Suspend automatic deletion, retain messages and account access, and do not edit or delete messages in this channel — the channel is a record of the court (Rule 60(5)(4)); violations are sanctionable as spoliation (Rule 26.3(7)). Clocks already running: - Service of the summons and complaint: within 7 days of filing, or dismissal as to the unserved defendant (Rule 4(7)). - Answer: within 72 hours after service; 96 hours for government defendants (Rule 12(4)). - Motions: opposition within 48 hours of service, reply within 24 hours; silence waives opposition (Rule 7.1). - The pre-trial period is 168 hours from commencement (Rule 6(1)). Computation: Every period runs continuously in UTC — no weekends, holidays, or court hours (Rule 6). The e-filing system computes no deadlines and issues no reminders (Rule 6(11)); CaseHawk posts reminders here, but each party remains responsible for its own computation. Ridgeway Rules of Civil Procedure [0003] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 19, 2026, 10:37:44 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-8446 Filing Code: COMPLAINT Bates Number: BATES-20260819-0782725008 RW Courts • live docket update [0004] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 20, 2026, 02:06:53 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-8446 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260819-0782725008 RW Courts • live docket update [0005] split75th — Aug 20, 2026, 05:52:13 AM UTC <@1069415674356715560> Please assign to me when you have a moment! No rush, I just cannot myself lol [0006] split75th — Aug 20, 2026, 05:52:52 AM UTC <@901097252418879539> confirm you can speak here please [0007] split75th — Aug 20, 2026, 05:54:26 AM UTC disregard this halo, this is a matter i cannot preside as the respondent is being filed against in their official capacity, please refer this to a superior court judge [0008] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 20, 2026, 07:16:50 AM UTC Embedded content: NOTICE OF APPEARANCE An attorney has filed a Notice of Appearance in this case. Attorney: <@502637353140092930> Appearing on behalf of: larkin_rblx (Respondent) Filed at: <t:1787210210:F> Entered on the court docket (BATES-20260820-8944860859) [0009] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 20, 2026, 07:16:57 AM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-8446 Status: PAID Total Cents: $0.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0010] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 20, 2026, 07:16:58 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-8446 Filing Code: NOTICE_OF_APPEARANCE Bates Number: BATES-20260820-8944860859 RW Courts • live docket update [0011] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 20, 2026, 07:31:38 AM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-8446 Status: PAID Total Cents: $0.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0012] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 20, 2026, 07:31:39 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-8446 Filing Code: RESPONSE Bates Number: BATES-20260820-7471071151 RW Courts • live docket update [0013] roundsquare6018 — Aug 20, 2026, 07:34:52 AM UTC this time, hes not even challenging the legality of an arrest. therefore the court should dismiss this petiton. this court has repeatedly dismissed these types of "post-arrest claims" and told petitioners to go fight it in a lawsuit, where a trial is necessary. [0014] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 20, 2026, 11:31:59 AM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-8446 Status: PAID Total Cents: $0.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0015] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 20, 2026, 11:32:01 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-8446 Filing Code: REPLY Bates Number: BATES-20260820-1760763390 RW Courts • live docket update [0016] flimzee — Aug 20, 2026, 01:31:46 PM UTC <@901097252418879539> [0017] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 21, 2026, 02:12:33 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-8446 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260820-1760763390 RW Courts • live docket update [0018] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 21, 2026, 02:12:58 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-8446 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260820-7471071151 RW Courts • live docket update [0019] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 21, 2026, 02:13:02 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-8446 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260820-8944860859 RW Courts • live docket update [0020] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 21, 2026, 02:14:18 AM UTC Embedded content: Case Docketed • RSC-CV-8446 Score: 0.3895362986111111 Method: AUTO_TIE_DRAW Reason: → AlbertWellesley · fill 0.39 · blind draw among 2 tied RW Courts • live docket update [0021] flimzee — Aug 21, 2026, 02:14:40 AM UTC <@162074259835846656> [0022] ii_freewifi — Aug 21, 2026, 02:54:53 AM UTC <@162074259835846656> Your Honor, I respectfully request a summons despite Respondent already formally filing an answer because service is still technically required to be effectuated [0023] roundsquare6018 — Aug 21, 2026, 04:11:26 AM UTC state law requires petitioner serve a copy to respondent himself. this should have been done automatically [0024] roundsquare6018 — Aug 21, 2026, 04:12:28 AM UTC i’m not saying that’s grounds to dismiss. it’s honestly no big deal given respondent is already here and has a copy [0025] kezzera — Aug 21, 2026, 05:27:37 AM UTC <@1069415674356715560> [0026] kezzera — Aug 21, 2026, 05:27:48 AM UTC i believe one has to be generated for him, the papers [0027] roundsquare6018 — Aug 21, 2026, 07:25:38 AM UTC Very well. Respondent reminds this Court of Petitioner's obligation under 7 R. Stat. § 133.003. He cannot file and expect an immediate ruling without notifying the Respondent. [0028] ii_freewifi — Aug 21, 2026, 07:43:08 AM UTC Petitioner stresses to the Court that service under 7 R. Stat. § 133.003 is effectively impossible, even after issuance of a summons, because as stated on the record previously by Respondent, no Solicitor General exists. Respondent's point is moot, and the Respondent cannot expect Petitioner to conform to their schedule because they're unable to use contextual clues. If the Petitioner were "filing and expecting an immediate ruling without notifying the Respondent," the Petitioner would not have requested a summons be generated. Lastly, Petitioner reminds this Court that Respondent's counsel is a licensed attorney bound by the Rules of Professional Standards and the Respondent's comment on the record in RSC-CV-1769 is contemptuous, violating such rules. [0029] kezzera — Aug 21, 2026, 12:53:58 PM UTC HABEAS / +VE RELIEF REQ [0030] roundsquare6018 — Aug 21, 2026, 01:00:55 PM UTC you're accusing me of contempt why? [0031] roundsquare6018 — Aug 21, 2026, 01:02:13 PM UTC you've filed 3 habeas petitions in one day and now call opposing counsel contemptuous? citing a state law is not considered contempt [0032] ii_freewifi — Aug 21, 2026, 06:52:22 PM UTC The contempt allegation is not directed at Respondent’s citation of state law, nor at the number of habeas petitions filed. It is directed specifically at Respondent’s comment of record in RSC-CV-1769, as I already stated. Petitioner further notes that exercising a constitutional and statutory right to seek habeas relief cannot be held against Petitioner or used as a basis for prejudice, bias, or adverse characterization by Respondent or this Court. Filing multiple petitions in good faith is not evidence of wrongdoing, it is the proper use of available legal process. [0033] flimzee — Aug 21, 2026, 11:18:51 PM UTC <@1304820579035119657> [0034] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 21, 2026, 11:27:21 PM UTC Embedded content: Record Notice — Message Deleted The proceeding communications are a record of the court; no participant may edit or delete a message in them (Rule 60(5)(4)). Corrections are made by a new message. The original text is preserved below. Author: skittlesf0909 Originally sent: <t:1787354831:F> Original text: The clerk transmits the following summons which have also been uploaded to this case file: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ILxm5zXj3gJOZmvArNtxO-VhUpnnlKkX/view?usp=sharing cc: <@162074259835846656> <@502637353140092930> -# be sure to serve this through <#1481487958313009364>, thank you! Spoliation of a court record may be sanctionable (Rules 26.3(7), 53) [0035] skittlesf0909 — Aug 21, 2026, 11:28:26 PM UTC The clerk transmits the following summons which have also been uploaded to this case file: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mxOPcMrro3etL8r1TpitixFgk2l8s-x3/view cc: <@162074259835846656> <@502637353140092930> be sure to serve this through request-service, thank you! Embedded content: 2026 Civil Summons Larkin_RBLX (8446).pdf [0036] skittlesf0909 — Aug 21, 2026, 11:28:59 PM UTC (Disregard the deleted message, wrong file submitted) [0037] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 21, 2026, 11:48:47 PM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-8446 Status: PAID Total Cents: $0.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0038] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 21, 2026, 11:48:48 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-8446 Filing Code: OTHER Bates Number: BATES-20260821-6038202978 RW Courts • live docket update [0039] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 21, 2026, 11:52:11 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-8446 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260821-6038202978 RW Courts • live docket update [0040] roundsquare6018 — Aug 22, 2026, 05:05:47 AM UTC why are you accusing me of contempt of court [0041] roundsquare6018 — Aug 22, 2026, 05:06:54 AM UTC its a very serious thing to be throwing around immediately. it can impact my credibility. [0042] ii_freewifi — Aug 22, 2026, 05:21:24 AM UTC RSC-CV-1769 -- profanity toward opposing litigant on the record. If you'd like I can cite the exact Rule of Professional Standard you violated. [0043] roundsquare6018 — Aug 22, 2026, 05:27:04 AM UTC thats a different case. the judge needs to decide whether or not i hurt your feelings now by using profanity. where exactly did i use such language [0044] ii_freewifi — Aug 22, 2026, 05:29:33 AM UTC Asking the Deputy Attorney General to refrain from professional incompetence and uphold the rules he is bound by doesn't mean you hurt my feelings This message: https://discord.com/channels/955339522936279040/1539799777087201340/1539887261082980353 [0045] kezzera — Aug 22, 2026, 08:17:32 AM UTC <@901097252418879539> <@502637353140092930> ORDERED 1. No contempt - appropriate resolution in RSC-CV-8446 proposed [0046] kezzera — Aug 22, 2026, 08:21:55 AM UTC holy hell everything here is messed up [0047] ii_freewifi — Aug 22, 2026, 08:30:12 AM UTC My apologies your Honor, I will ensure tiny clerical and procedural issues are no longer made in future to prevent delays and keep this Court moving smoothly [0048] kezzera — Aug 22, 2026, 08:39:06 AM UTC i expect stuff to be amended accordingly [0049] kezzera — Aug 22, 2026, 08:39:22 AM UTC i will consider consolidating unless they're all actually separate [0050] roundsquare6018 — Aug 22, 2026, 09:02:57 AM UTC I apologize to the Petitioner. [0051] kezzera — Aug 22, 2026, 09:55:24 AM UTC grand, let's move on then [0052] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 25, 2026, 10:37:32 PM UTC **DEADLINE NOTICE** - Plaintiff Embedded content: DEADLINE NOTICE An upcoming deadline is approaching. Party: Plaintiff Description: Rule 4(7) — 24-hour notice: the service-of-process period expires <t:1787783842:F>; unserved defendants face dismissal (Rule 28(2)(e)) Notice Given: <t:1787697442:F> Advance notice; see the description for the operative deadline [0053] roundsquare6018 — Aug 26, 2026, 10:08:45 PM UTC For the Court's information, I am flying across the world. Will be offline for approx 48hrs while I transit and get my self established again. [0054] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 26, 2026, 10:37:34 PM UTC **DEADLINE REMINDER** - All parties Embedded content: DEADLINE DUE A deadline has now come due. Party: All parties Description: Rule 4(7)/6(1): the service-of-process period and the pre-trial period expire now (168 hours from commencement, continuous UTC) Due Date: <t:1787783842:F> This deadline is now due [0055] kezzera — Aug 31, 2026, 10:59:02 AM UTC OUTS [0056] roundsquare6018 — Oct 1, 2026, 06:07:12 PM UTC cc <@162074259835846656> [0057] caseHAWK (BOT) — Oct 2, 2026, 02:34:23 AM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-8446 Status: PENDING Total Cents: $60.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0058] caseHAWK (BOT) — Oct 2, 2026, 02:34:23 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-8446 Filing Code: MOTION Bates Number: BATES-20261002-3921680273 RW Courts • live docket update [0059] caseHAWK (BOT) — Oct 2, 2026, 01:44:28 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-8446 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20261002-3921680273 RW Courts • live docket update [0060] caseHAWK (BOT) — Oct 2, 2026, 01:44:29 PM UTC Embedded content: Motion Accepted — Briefing Clock Running **Motion** (`BATES-20261002-3921680273`) Opposition due <t:1791121451:F> (<t:1791121451:R>) — 48 hours after service (Rule 7.1(4)). Failure to respond within the period is deemed a waiver of opposition (Rule 7.1(9)). A reply is due within 24 hours after any opposition is served (Rule 7.1(5)). Periods run continuously in UTC (Rule 7.1(8)); anchor: clerk acceptance per the docket event Automatically generated by CaseHawk. This is a true and accurate transcript of the proceedings as recorded in the specified Discord channel.

transcript_takosull0-v-larkin-rblx_2026-10-02.pdf

Original document

Searchable full text

Document record