Ridgeway Unified Courts

JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF RIDGEWAY

Searchable full text

24,101 characters extracted

—

OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS Superior Court of the State of Ridgeway Category: Judge AlbertWellesly's Docket #takosull0-v-dannydoesapprove Archive Window: Aug 20, 2026, 12:54:35 AM UTC – Oct 2, 2026, 01:44:10 PM UTC Total Messages: 110 Timezone: UTC Message Log [0001] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 20, 2026, 12:54:35 AM UTC Embedded content: Case: RSC-CV-1769 takosull0 v. DannyDoesApprove Plaintiff(s): takosull0 Defendant(s): DannyDoesApprove Type: CIVIL Court: SUPERIOR Status: ACTIVE Presiding Judge: Unassigned Case Link: [View on RW Courts](https://rwcourts.org/public-case/RSC-CV-1769) RW Courts • live case record [0002] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 20, 2026, 12:54:36 AM UTC Embedded content: Procedural Notice — Preservation and Deadlines Duty to preserve (Rule 26(7)): The duty to preserve documents, communications, and electronically stored information has attached. Suspend automatic deletion, retain messages and account access, and do not edit or delete messages in this channel — the channel is a record of the court (Rule 60(5)(4)); violations are sanctionable as spoliation (Rule 26.3(7)). Clocks already running: - Service of the summons and complaint: within 7 days of filing, or dismissal as to the unserved defendant (Rule 4(7)). - Answer: within 72 hours after service; 96 hours for government defendants (Rule 12(4)). - Motions: opposition within 48 hours of service, reply within 24 hours; silence waives opposition (Rule 7.1). - The pre-trial period is 168 hours from commencement (Rule 6(1)). Computation: Every period runs continuously in UTC — no weekends, holidays, or court hours (Rule 6). The e-filing system computes no deadlines and issues no reminders (Rule 6(11)); CaseHawk posts reminders here, but each party remains responsible for its own computation. Ridgeway Rules of Civil Procedure [0003] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 20, 2026, 12:54:52 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-1769 Filing Code: COMPLAINT Bates Number: BATES-20260820-1212855422 RW Courts • live docket update [0004] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 20, 2026, 02:06:59 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-1769 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260820-1212855422 RW Courts • live docket update [0005] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 20, 2026, 06:40:17 AM UTC Embedded content: NOTICE OF APPEARANCE An attorney has filed a Notice of Appearance in this case. Attorney: <@502637353140092930> Appearing on behalf of: DannyDoesApprove (Respondent) Filed at: <t:1787208017:F> Entered on the court docket (BATES-20260820-1374047432) [0006] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 20, 2026, 06:40:37 AM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-1769 Status: PAID Total Cents: $0.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0007] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 20, 2026, 06:40:38 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-1769 Filing Code: NOTICE_OF_APPEARANCE Bates Number: BATES-20260820-1374047432 RW Courts • live docket update [0008] roundsquare6018 — Aug 20, 2026, 06:42:12 AM UTC dumbass stop giving evidence of u committing the crime ur challenging [0009] roundsquare6018 — Aug 20, 2026, 06:42:29 AM UTC a formal brief will be filed [0010] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 20, 2026, 07:14:56 AM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-1769 Status: PAID Total Cents: $0.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0011] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 20, 2026, 07:14:58 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-1769 Filing Code: RESPONSE Bates Number: BATES-20260820-7571865620 RW Courts • live docket update [0012] roundsquare6018 — Aug 20, 2026, 07:15:44 AM UTC The evidence is altered. Medal doesn't clip in 1m16s incriminates. He's obviously cut the video to avoid showing prior warnings and repeated honking to mislead this Court. That should automatically dismiss his claims. Further reasons why his petition doesn't survive the *Zachcasisbeast* are outlined in the brief filed on website [0013] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 20, 2026, 11:56:00 AM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-1769 Status: PENDING Total Cents: $60.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0014] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 20, 2026, 11:56:20 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-1769 Filing Code: MOTION Bates Number: BATES-20260820-7039532387 RW Courts • live docket update [0015] flimzee — Aug 20, 2026, 01:31:57 PM UTC <@901097252418879539> [0016] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 21, 2026, 02:12:06 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-1769 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260820-1374047432 RW Courts • live docket update [0017] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 21, 2026, 02:12:27 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-1769 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260820-7039532387 RW Courts • live docket update [0018] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 21, 2026, 02:12:31 AM UTC Embedded content: Motion Accepted — Briefing Clock Running **Motion** (`BATES-20260820-7039532387`) Opposition due <t:1787451118:F> (<t:1787451118:R>) — 48 hours after service (Rule 7.1(4)). Failure to respond within the period is deemed a waiver of opposition (Rule 7.1(9)). A reply is due within 24 hours after any opposition is served (Rule 7.1(5)). Periods run continuously in UTC (Rule 7.1(8)); anchor: clerk acceptance per the docket event [0019] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 21, 2026, 02:13:05 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-1769 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260820-7571865620 RW Courts • live docket update [0020] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 21, 2026, 02:13:08 AM UTC Embedded content: Opposition Filed — Reply Window Open Opposition to **Motion** is on the docket. Movant's reply due <t:1787364755:F> (<t:1787364755:R>) (Rule 7.1(5)). No further paper may be filed on the motion without leave of court. Periods run continuously in UTC (Rule 7.1(8)) [0021] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 21, 2026, 02:13:18 AM UTC Embedded content: Case Docketed • RSC-CV-1769 Score: 0.2 Method: AUTO_TIE_DRAW Reason: → AlbertWellesley · fill 0.20 · blind draw among 2 tied RW Courts • live docket update [0022] flimzee — Aug 21, 2026, 02:14:44 AM UTC <@162074259835846656> [0023] ii_freewifi — Aug 21, 2026, 02:55:02 AM UTC <@162074259835846656> Your Honor, I respectfully request a summons despite Respondent already formally filing an answer because service is still technically required to be effectuated [0024] roundsquare6018 — Aug 21, 2026, 04:11:48 AM UTC state law requires petitioner provide a copy to respondent upon filing this petition. he should’ve done this immediately [0025] roundsquare6018 — Aug 21, 2026, 04:12:32 AM UTC i’m not saying that’s grounds to dismiss. it’s honestly no big deal given respondent is already here and has a copy [0026] kezzera — Aug 21, 2026, 05:28:00 AM UTC i believe one has to be generated for him, the papers [0027] ii_freewifi — Aug 21, 2026, 06:51:41 AM UTC Yes your Honor, that's correct [0028] kezzera — Aug 21, 2026, 10:35:55 AM UTC <@1069415674356715560> [0029] kezzera — Aug 21, 2026, 12:53:30 PM UTC HABEAS / +VE RELIEF REQ [0030] roundsquare6018 — Aug 21, 2026, 01:11:17 PM UTC your honor the Respondent objects to allowing petitioner to file an amended petiton. We have already filed a brief, showing our defense and arguments. now the court must rule. the Court shouldn't allow petitoner to amend after the reply points out all his mistakes. It's a get-out-of- jail free card [0031] roundsquare6018 — Aug 21, 2026, 01:12:09 PM UTC ridgeway habeas petitons are extremely straightforward: petition -> reply -> ruling a habeas isnt a civil trial. [0032] ii_freewifi — Aug 21, 2026, 07:29:12 PM UTC Your Honor, the Petitioner objects to Respondent being counsel in this proceeding. The Respondent stated before that he would be defending the action as the Deputy Attorney General since the Solicitor General is vacant. However, I would like to stress to this Court that Ridgeway law is extremely straightforward: 7 R. Stat. § 122.005 -- "the Solicitor General shall defend all proceedings against government officers in their official capacities." Section 122.005 is very cookie-cutter clear, and there be no provision under law that permits defense otherwise. The State's inability to keep the key legal office adequately staffed should not be an excuse allowing Respondent to further violate the law. Being an Deputy Attorney General doesn't give you a get a whatever-you-want and disobey-unambiguous-law card. Because of this, Respondent's briefs, objections, and anything else the Respondent moves this Court to do in this matter is thereby prohibited by law. Thus, the Court should not take weight to Respondent's objection and should furthermore strike Respondent's response. Lastly, I would like to state to this Court that pointing out simple procedural mistakes and moving to rectify them does not damage the substance of the case or prejudice the Respondent. This is the exact reason why amended petitions exist; to fix errors like this. [0033] flimzee — Aug 21, 2026, 11:19:04 PM UTC <@1304820579035119657> [0034] skittlesf0909 — Aug 21, 2026, 11:31:06 PM UTC The clerk transmits the following summons which have also been uploaded to this case file: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1T3RVkFVpTgiZ1fgp71KRk0C1H7hXEzsu/view cc: <@502637353140092930> <@162074259835846656> -# be sure to serve this through <#1481487958313009364>, thank you! Embedded content: 2026 Civil Summons DannyDoesApprove (1769).pdf [0035] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 21, 2026, 11:47:47 PM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-1769 Status: PAID Total Cents: $0.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0036] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 21, 2026, 11:48:07 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-1769 Filing Code: OTHER Bates Number: BATES-20260821-9900895427 RW Courts • live docket update [0037] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 21, 2026, 11:52:15 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-1769 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260821-9900895427 RW Courts • live docket update [0038] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 22, 2026, 02:16:18 AM UTC Embedded content: Motion Ripe for Decision **Motion** (`BATES-20260820-7039532387`) stands submitted for decision (Rule 7.1(10)). The reply window has expired. The court may rule on the papers without further notice. Ripe-motion age is tracked in the daily docket health report [0039] roundsquare6018 — Aug 22, 2026, 05:09:49 AM UTC your honor this petitioner has filed 3 habeas claims in the same day, proceeded to accuse me of contempt, and now argues I should be thrown out of proceedings. its already been stated that there is no SG, and I am the next available position in that chain of command. The Court has allowed me to represent in one of his claims, I see why it wouldn't allow me in this one. he can make all the motions and demands he wants. at the end of the day, a habeas is a simple process. petition -> reply -> ruling when a petitoner begins making recusal motions (essentially what this is), it becomes a civil pretrial. [0040] ii_freewifi — Aug 22, 2026, 05:18:24 AM UTC I would like to personally remind Respondent that a habeas petition is a civil proceeding. Additionally, this should not have to be a full blown trial for Petitioner to request that the second Chief Legal Officer of the State proceed in court legally. As I stated before, 7 R. Stat. § 122.005 is clear. Respondent has not presented any basis for rebuttal but instead has constantly complained about the litigation to this Court. Unless Respondent presents a legal basis that contradicts 7 R. Stat. § 122.005, or this Court raise something Sua Sponte, I see no reason why Respondent's counsel should be allowed to serve. [0041] roundsquare6018 — Aug 22, 2026, 05:24:08 AM UTC my rebuttal is filed on the website [0042] ii_freewifi — Aug 22, 2026, 05:27:42 AM UTC The last opposition on the website (even with the BATES number provided as the motion opposition) was to the petition itself, not the motion. Attachments: image.png — https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1539799777087201340/1540593288736940082/image.png? ex=6ac13b0e&is=6abfe98e&hm=a34d4c97da936aa857c3efb851bb892fa817e091a75d2d9f0091a513f04a1e7e& [0043] kezzera — Aug 22, 2026, 08:03:10 AM UTC inappropriate, apologies expected towards party directed [0044] kezzera — Aug 22, 2026, 08:03:37 AM UTC why are we amending? <@901097252418879539> [0045] kezzera — Aug 22, 2026, 08:07:32 AM UTC two clerical errors? [0046] ii_freewifi — Aug 22, 2026, 08:07:39 AM UTC I made two procedural issues: - I put DannyDoesApprove in his official capacity as part of RCSO when it should be RPS - And the statute I cited for the offense I was arrested for was RVC § 1.03 when it should be RVC § 9.04 I don't think amending this would change the substance of the initial petition, and would just correct a few procedural defects. [0047] ii_freewifi — Aug 22, 2026, 08:08:03 AM UTC Yes, your Honor. Nothing else would be modified. [0048] kezzera — Aug 22, 2026, 08:09:08 AM UTC <@502637353140092930> <@901097252418879539> ORDERED [0049] kezzera — Aug 22, 2026, 08:12:45 AM UTC 1. Motion to Amend Petition in respect of a. capacity of Respondent and b. citation of charge, with leave of court GRANTED 2. Brief in Opposition to be Discounted in respect of arguments regarding error in citation of charge ONLY, remaining parts of Brief in Opposition remains and to be read with petition 3. No sanction imposed on condition Respondent counsel makes apologies to Petitioner 4. No further brief required, amendment will be read along with original petition as if incorporated 5. No order is made as to capacity of Respondent's counsel to represent Respondent unless first raised formally by written motions (challenge to court's earlier decision to allow Respondent's counsel to appear for and on behalf of Respondent) [0050] kezzera — Aug 22, 2026, 08:13:15 AM UTC all to be enteredd shortly [0051] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 22, 2026, 08:17:31 AM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-1769 Status: PAID Total Cents: $0.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0052] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 22, 2026, 08:17:32 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-1769 Filing Code: OTHER Bates Number: BATES-20260822-1555222806 RW Courts • live docket update [0053] kezzera — Aug 22, 2026, 08:18:43 AM UTC FURTHER ORDERED <@502637353140092930> shall be given leave to file supplemental in respect of the error in citation [0054] kezzera — Aug 22, 2026, 08:18:55 AM UTC Sua sponte FJ [0055] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 22, 2026, 08:33:34 AM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-1769 Status: PENDING Total Cents: $60.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0056] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 22, 2026, 08:33:35 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-1769 Filing Code: MOTION Bates Number: BATES-20260822-1707303229 RW Courts • live docket update [0057] roundsquare6018 — Aug 22, 2026, 09:02:55 AM UTC I apologize to the Petitioner. [0058] kezzera — Aug 22, 2026, 09:55:30 AM UTC grand, moving on [0059] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 22, 2026, 11:21:05 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-1769 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260822-1707303229 RW Courts • live docket update [0060] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 22, 2026, 11:21:08 AM UTC Embedded content: Motion Accepted — Briefing Clock Running **Motion** (`BATES-20260822-1707303229`) Opposition due <t:1787570460:F> (<t:1787570460:R>) — 48 hours after service (Rule 7.1(4)). Failure to respond within the period is deemed a waiver of opposition (Rule 7.1(9)). A reply is due within 24 hours after any opposition is served (Rule 7.1(5)). Periods run continuously in UTC (Rule 7.1(8)); anchor: clerk acceptance per the docket event [0061] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 22, 2026, 11:21:45 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-1769 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260822-1555222806 RW Courts • live docket update [0062] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 22, 2026, 12:59:09 PM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-1769 Status: PAID Total Cents: $0.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0063] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 22, 2026, 12:59:10 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-1769 Filing Code: RESPONSE Bates Number: BATES-20260822-8295767855 RW Courts • live docket update [0064] ii_freewifi — Aug 24, 2026, 07:02:09 PM UTC Your Honor, it is my understanding that you permitted Respondent to file a supplemental opposition due to my error in citation, followed by an amended petition. You specified no deadline for the Respondent, and I would like to inquire on a deadline so I am able to pay respect to the Rules of Civil Procedure governing when I must file my reply to the supplemental opposition. It has been a few days, and Respondent has not filed a supplemental, and I am trying to ensure I don't waive my ability to file a reply to the response. <@162074259835846656> [0065] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 24, 2026, 08:51:05 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Rejected • RSC-CV-1769 Status: REJECTED Bates Number: BATES-20260822-8295767855 Rejection Reason: Improperly Filed Document (Fix the case number) RW Courts • live docket update [0066] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 24, 2026, 08:51:24 PM UTC Embedded content: Motion Ripe for Decision **Motion** (`BATES-20260822-1707303229`) stands submitted for decision (Rule 7.1(10)). No opposition was filed within 48 hours — opposition is deemed waived (Rule 7.1(9)); the motion is unopposed. The court may rule on the papers without further notice. Ripe-motion age is tracked in the daily docket health report [0067] roundsquare6018 — Aug 25, 2026, 08:42:50 AM UTC The Court made it clear in line 4 of its order [0068] roundsquare6018 — Aug 25, 2026, 08:43:34 AM UTC why is petitoner trying to make respondent file another brief? does he not expect the exact same arguments? [0069] roundsquare6018 — Aug 25, 2026, 08:56:10 AM UTC cant ask for an updated response because you didnt like the original [0070] ii_freewifi — Aug 25, 2026, 04:35:03 PM UTC The Court further ordered sua sponte that the Respondent be allowed to file a supplemental. I’m unsure why Respondent doesn’t want to provide an updated response since the original response is just devoted to pointing out clerical orders and hardly touches on the legality of the arrest. However, if this is Respondent’s wish, I’ll file my reply. [0071] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 26, 2026, 12:54:33 AM UTC **DEADLINE NOTICE** - Plaintiff Embedded content: DEADLINE NOTICE An upcoming deadline is approaching. Party: Plaintiff Description: Rule 4(7) — 24-hour notice: the service-of-process period expires <t:1787792068:F>; unserved defendants face dismissal (Rule 28(2)(e)) Notice Given: <t:1787705668:F> Advance notice; see the description for the operative deadline [0072] roundsquare6018 — Aug 26, 2026, 10:08:48 PM UTC For the Court's information, I am flying across the world. Will be offline for approx 48hrs while I transit and get my self established again. [0073] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 27, 2026, 12:54:34 AM UTC **DEADLINE REMINDER** - All parties Embedded content: DEADLINE DUE A deadline has now come due. Party: All parties Description: Rule 4(7)/6(1): the service-of-process period and the pre-trial period expire now (168 hours from commencement, continuous UTC) Due Date: <t:1787792068:F> This deadline is now due [0074] kezzera — Aug 31, 2026, 10:59:05 AM UTC OUTS [0075] ii_freewifi — Sep 20, 2026, 02:36:14 AM UTC <@502637353140092930> alright buddy time to recuse yourself now that you got a sg [0076] ii_freewifi — Sep 20, 2026, 02:36:27 AM UTC plaintiffs motion should therefore be GRANTED [0077] roundsquare6018 — Sep 20, 2026, 04:26:21 AM UTC ??? [0078] roundsquare6018 — Sep 20, 2026, 04:26:33 AM UTC the court needs to rule on the case lol [0079] ii_freewifi — Sep 20, 2026, 04:01:31 PM UTC your excuse has been that you didnt have a sg [0080] ii_freewifi — Sep 20, 2026, 04:01:34 PM UTC well you do [0081] ii_freewifi — Sep 20, 2026, 04:02:05 PM UTC so your response should be striked and therefore the government failed to respond thus resulting in a default [0082] roundsquare6018 — Sep 20, 2026, 07:25:52 PM UTC there’s no such thing for habeas [0083] roundsquare6018 — Sep 20, 2026, 07:26:06 PM UTC <@162074259835846656> why can we expect a ruling [0084] roundsquare6018 — Sep 20, 2026, 07:26:17 PM UTC this case is almost a month old [0085] kezzera — Sep 20, 2026, 07:48:44 PM UTC <@502637353140092930> <@901097252418879539> [0086] kezzera — Sep 20, 2026, 07:48:54 PM UTC i can't likely sustain this as three different cases, it's driving me crazy [0087] kezzera — Sep 20, 2026, 07:49:10 PM UTC <@901097252418879539> it is seriously bad on your part to file three actions that are quite similar [0088] kezzera — Sep 20, 2026, 07:49:47 PM UTC so i am considering on joining these on my own and proceeding as one action - i want to hear objections to this within 24 hours [0089] kezzera — Sep 20, 2026, 07:50:02 PM UTC <@502637353140092930> likewise a response [0090] caseHAWK (BOT) — Sep 20, 2026, 08:02:50 PM UTC Embedded content: Order Issued • RSC-CV-1769 Type: MOTION_RULING Title: Order on Motion to Strike Respondent's Appearance RW Courts • live docket update [0091] caseHAWK (BOT) — Sep 20, 2026, 08:02:52 PM UTC Order issued on **RSC-CV-1769**: Order on Motion to Strike Respondent's Appearance Attachments: order_RSC-CV-1769.pdf — https://cdn.discordapp.com/ attachments/1539799777087201340/1551322777695428708/order_RSC-CV-1769.pdf? ex=6ac0b6ac&is=6abf652c&hm=01f6e7b5e4095be9b9755c375093778a313b6f71ff712a8fc1865efc27eea974& [0092] roundsquare6018 — Sep 20, 2026, 08:02:53 PM UTC All 3 of the State’s responses apply the Zachcaisbeast test, but also have different arguments. What would the court use to decide all 3 cases with 3 different petitions and responses [0093] kezzera — Sep 20, 2026, 08:05:26 PM UTC oh what [0094] kezzera — Sep 20, 2026, 08:05:40 PM UTC they're all different events and facts [0095] kezzera — Sep 20, 2026, 08:05:45 PM UTC i swear i read them all as the 19th [0096] kezzera — Sep 20, 2026, 08:05:56 PM UTC you're kidding, rightt? [0097] roundsquare6018 — Sep 20, 2026, 08:07:10 PM UTC as much as i can remember, 3 different incidents [0098] kezzera — Sep 20, 2026, 08:12:05 PM UTC right well nevermind then [0099] kezzera — Sep 20, 2026, 08:12:18 PM UTC gotta get this shit going [0100] kezzera — Sep 20, 2026, 08:12:28 PM UTC tldr, the motion is denied <@901097252418879539> [0101] kezzera — Sep 20, 2026, 08:12:36 PM UTC respondent's counsel will remain [0102] kezzera — Sep 20, 2026, 08:12:59 PM UTC if there needs to be a swap, state justice dept will switch out themselves [0103] roundsquare6018 — Sep 23, 2026, 07:35:52 PM UTC theres not any more litigating to do given the respondent has responded to the petiton, it just needs a final court ruling and thats it [0104] roundsquare6018 — Sep 23, 2026, 07:36:09 PM UTC habeas petitions are very straight forward here in ridgeway. petition -> response -> ruling [0105] roundsquare6018 — Sep 25, 2026, 06:02:06 PM UTC still waiting for rulings ur honor ❤️ <@162074259835846656> [0106] roundsquare6018 — Oct 1, 2026, 06:07:15 PM UTC cc <@162074259835846656> ❤️ [0107] caseHAWK (BOT) — Oct 2, 2026, 02:35:43 AM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-1769 Status: PENDING Total Cents: $60.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0108] caseHAWK (BOT) — Oct 2, 2026, 02:35:44 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-1769 Filing Code: MOTION Bates Number: BATES-20261002-6727253331 RW Courts • live docket update [0109] caseHAWK (BOT) — Oct 2, 2026, 01:44:09 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-1769 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20261002-6727253331 RW Courts • live docket update [0110] caseHAWK (BOT) — Oct 2, 2026, 01:44:10 PM UTC Embedded content: Motion Accepted — Briefing Clock Running **Motion** (`BATES-20261002-6727253331`) Opposition due <t:1791121447:F> (<t:1791121447:R>) — 48 hours after service (Rule 7.1(4)). Failure to respond within the period is deemed a waiver of opposition (Rule 7.1(9)). A reply is due within 24 hours after any opposition is served (Rule 7.1(5)). Periods run continuously in UTC (Rule 7.1(8)); anchor: clerk acceptance per the docket event Automatically generated by CaseHawk. This is a true and accurate transcript of the proceedings as recorded in the specified Discord channel.

transcript_takosull0-v-dannydoesapprove_2026-10-02.pdf

Original document

Searchable full text

Document record