Ridgeway Unified Courts

JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF RIDGEWAY

Searchable full text

51,630 characters extracted

—

OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS Superior Court of the State of Ridgeway Category: Riding Justice Techiey's Docket #nicklaus-s-v-mattcern Archive Window: Jul 24, 2026, 09:00:54 PM UTC – Sep 18, 2026, 06:03:45 AM UTC Total Messages: 328 Timezone: UTC Message Log [0001] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 24, 2026, 09:00:54 PM UTC Embedded content: Case: RSC-CV-3940 Nicklaus_s v. Mattcern Plaintiff(s): Nicklaus_s Defendant(s): mattcern Type: CIVIL Court: SUPERIOR Status: ACTIVE Presiding Judge: Unassigned Case Link: [View on RW Courts](https://rwcourts.org/case-details/RSC-CV-3940) RW Courts • live case record [0002] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 24, 2026, 09:00:56 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-3940 Filing Code: COMPLAINT Bates Number: BATES-20260724-2635663385 RW Courts • live docket update [0003] imnotrummy — Jul 25, 2026, 01:38:44 AM UTC CC: <@&955340953898590218> [0004] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 25, 2026, 02:19:37 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-3940 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260724-2635663385 RW Courts • live docket update [0005] imnotrummy — Jul 25, 2026, 05:01:32 AM UTC <@522894402281275434> recusal notice requirement. [0006] imnotrummy — Jul 25, 2026, 05:01:48 AM UTC <@1463388891578110086> for pre trial stuff then. [0007] split75th — Jul 25, 2026, 05:02:45 AM UTC Reviewing now [0008] split75th — Jul 25, 2026, 05:02:50 AM UTC Acknowledged [0009] split75th — Jul 25, 2026, 05:50:42 AM UTC Very well, <@561923789152190466> can you please confirm you can speak here? [0010] nicklaus_s — Jul 25, 2026, 06:27:00 AM UTC Yes [0011] nicklaus_s — Jul 25, 2026, 06:27:56 AM UTC I have proposed summons ready to file and serve once I get permission to affix signatures from the clerk and judge once this is assigned [0012] nicklaus_s — Jul 25, 2026, 06:31:01 AM UTC https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tcaxOW5jsubc9X8Bia-Yh2PAQDRFd8PSIygPBf_oLvQ/edit? usp=sharing https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B0RtDED2RIWF2IOFP5W4MGBQkT2Tp-sBXIA2jlAWO4Q/edit? usp=sharing Embedded content: [Colonel Summons] Nicklaus_s v. Mattcern ADM F. 200 (Rev. 03/22) Summons in a Civil Action SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY NICKLAUS_S ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DOCKET NO. RSC-CV-3940 Plaintiff v. MATTCERN, in his official capacity Defendant SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION THIS SUMMONS... Embedded content: [Atty Gen Summons] Nicklaus_s v. Mattcern ADM F. 200 (Rev. 03/22) Summons in a Civil Action SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY NICKLAUS_S ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DOCKET NO. RSC-CV-3940 Plaintiff v. MATTCERN, in his official capacity Defendant SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION THIS SUMMONS... [0013] nicklaus_s — Jul 25, 2026, 06:33:25 AM UTC I will also state on the record that I attempted mediation under state law and was told “see you in court” [0014] split75th — Jul 25, 2026, 06:33:29 AM UTC Thank you very much, allow me to review this right now [0015] split75th — Jul 25, 2026, 06:33:37 AM UTC Will reflect [0016] split75th — Jul 25, 2026, 06:36:55 AM UTC These are both sufficient and you may affix my signature to both, I am a Magistrate just pending roles! [0017] split75th — Jul 25, 2026, 06:37:35 AM UTC <@1069415674356715560> Do you consent to your signature being added [0018] imnotrummy — Jul 25, 2026, 07:20:38 AM UTC We have commands. [0019] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 25, 2026, 07:21:57 AM UTC Embedded content: Civil Summons Issued Case Information: **Case Code:** RSC-CV-3940 **Plaintiff(s):** Nicklaus_s **Defendant(s):** mattcern Summons Delivered To: Matt (mattcern) Response Due: Within 5 days of service (7 days for government entities) Summons issued by imnotrummy [0020] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 25, 2026, 07:22:11 AM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-3940 Status: PAID Total Cents: $0.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0021] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 25, 2026, 07:22:13 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-3940 Filing Code: SUMM Bates Number: BATES-20260725-2729026503 RW Courts • live docket update [0022] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 25, 2026, 07:22:14 AM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-3940 Status: PAID Total Cents: $0.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0023] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 25, 2026, 07:22:16 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-3940 Filing Code: POS Bates Number: BATES-20260725-5282082992 RW Courts • live docket update [0024] imnotrummy — Jul 25, 2026, 07:22:28 AM UTC CC: <@1463388891578110086> <@561923789152190466> [0025] split75th — Jul 25, 2026, 07:22:44 AM UTC Thank you [0026] imnotrummy — Jul 25, 2026, 07:23:17 AM UTC Clerk automatically consents dude we believe in judicial economy here lol, just use command next time [0027] imnotrummy — Jul 25, 2026, 07:23:31 AM UTC No need for 40 rubber stamps of Chinese bureaucracy [0028] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 25, 2026, 07:25:41 AM UTC Embedded content: Civil Summons Issued Case Information: **Case Code:** RSC-CV-3940 **Plaintiff(s):** Nicklaus_s **Defendant(s):** mattcern Summons Delivered To: None Response Due: Within 5 days of service (7 days for government entities) Not Served — Alternative Service Required: AdamStratton (adam11244) — DM undeliverable Summons issued by imnotrummy [0029] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 25, 2026, 07:25:51 AM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-3940 Status: PAID Total Cents: $0.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0030] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 25, 2026, 07:25:52 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-3940 Filing Code: SUMM Bates Number: BATES-20260725-7579747442 RW Courts • live docket update [0031] imnotrummy — Jul 25, 2026, 07:26:32 AM UTC CC: <@&1481501848950145166> Someone go knock down Adam’s door [0032] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 25, 2026, 11:25:54 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-3940 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260725-7579747442 RW Courts • live docket update [0033] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 25, 2026, 11:25:56 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-3940 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260725-5282082992 RW Courts • live docket update [0034] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 25, 2026, 11:26:35 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-3940 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260725-2729026503 RW Courts • live docket update [0035] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 25, 2026, 01:19:56 PM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-3940 Status: PAID Total Cents: $0.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0036] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 25, 2026, 01:19:57 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-3940 Filing Code: NOTICE_OF_APPEARANCE Bates Number: BATES-20260725-5788946577 RW Courts • live docket update [0037] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 25, 2026, 01:31:17 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-3940 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260725-5788946577 RW Courts • live docket update [0038] stickza — Jul 25, 2026, 01:59:22 PM UTC <@1463388891578110086> Hi your honor, it has been about a year since I last practiced here. Just to clarify, we have seven days to produce an answer to the complaint, correct? [0039] stickza — Jul 25, 2026, 02:00:33 PM UTC I am still piecing together our procedural rules as I last remember them, but the code of statutes is so voluminous that I am having trouble finding the exact provision that provides for pre-trial. [0040] split75th — Jul 25, 2026, 04:11:22 PM UTC This is correct [0041] split75th — Jul 25, 2026, 04:11:57 PM UTC I can send some references into here in just a bit, im currently at work so ill get to the both of you sooner than later [0042] stickza — Jul 25, 2026, 04:32:37 PM UTC No rush at all. Thanks! [0043] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 25, 2026, 05:14:59 PM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-3940 Status: PAID Total Cents: $0.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0044] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 25, 2026, 05:15:00 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-3940 Filing Code: ANSWER Bates Number: BATES-20260725-7075789209 RW Courts • live docket update [0045] stickza — Jul 25, 2026, 05:18:36 PM UTC Answer filed. [0046] nicklaus_s — Jul 25, 2026, 05:19:00 PM UTC thank you!! [0047] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 25, 2026, 08:27:44 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-3940 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260725-7075789209 RW Courts • live docket update [0048] split75th — Jul 26, 2026, 04:20:15 AM UTC This is extremely delayed, and for that I apologize, here are some resources you may use if you have not already found/referenced them; Civil: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aznIATgRYUSC0RRr2hSRZSKy2MmuW2uX/view?usp=sharing Criminal: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1b4RZ3wowMbJj2ntUWR77q7-8clmw5YAE/view?usp=sharing Evidence: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pV1q3ThKIko-R7yTP2Q1UJ4wW_MltwM5/view?usp=sharing Embedded content: Rules_of_Civil_Procedure.pdf Embedded content: Rules_of_Criminal_Procedure.pdf Embedded content: Rules_of_Evidence.pdf [0049] split75th — Jul 26, 2026, 04:20:31 AM UTC Will review all right now and get a move on these proceedings [0050] imnotrummy — Jul 26, 2026, 04:22:50 AM UTC No way bro leaked my drafts [0051] nicklaus_s — Jul 26, 2026, 04:27:35 AM UTC The judicial council is not pleased [0052] split75th — Jul 26, 2026, 04:27:57 AM UTC Civil Procedure - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sT_qNGDgB_8Uy- IBsGzbMGgc03B4ry45kDhYp7Y0YGA/edit Criminal Procedure - https://docs.google.com/document/ d/1FCvjqYqcJJTStMYxs5AUIJshda7U4b3VsSAB6K5r4_w/edit Evidence - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k9CtXCEVutDR5ck7SVESGMD8GdKe14l3cusi6NDsTJc/ edit Right disregard what was sent above that isn't published! Embedded content: Ridgeway Rules of Civil Procedure STATE OF RIDGEWAY RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE ... Embedded content: Ridgeway Rules of Criminal Procedure STATE OF RIDGEWAY RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ... Embedded content: Ridgeway Rules of Evidence STATE OF RIDGEWAY RULES OF EVIDENCE ... [0053] nicklaus_s — Jul 26, 2026, 04:32:13 AM UTC Is rummy the judge in this case [0054] imnotrummy — Jul 26, 2026, 04:38:20 AM UTC Absolutely not [0055] split75th — Jul 26, 2026, 04:38:22 AM UTC I am presiding for pre-trial then it will proceed under a real Judge [0056] split75th — Jul 26, 2026, 06:00:04 AM UTC Answer received and reviewed, case is at issue [0057] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 26, 2026, 11:56:08 AM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-3940 Status: PAID Total Cents: $0.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0058] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 26, 2026, 11:56:10 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-3940 Filing Code: NOTICE_OF_APPEARANCE Bates Number: BATES-20260726-7423647275 RW Courts • live docket update [0059] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 26, 2026, 10:31:11 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-3940 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260726-7423647275 RW Courts • live docket update [0060] split75th — Jul 27, 2026, 04:04:20 AM UTC Okay, greetings all parties [0061] split75th — Jul 27, 2026, 04:06:03 AM UTC Defendants answer and affirmative defenses are accepted, <@561923789152190466> will we be expecting a response to the defendants affirmative defenses [0062] nicklaus_s — Jul 27, 2026, 04:14:46 AM UTC I dont think replies to an answer are provided for in our rules, nor have I ever seen one here [0063] split75th — Jul 27, 2026, 04:15:02 AM UTC Disregard that youre right I'm wrong [0064] nicklaus_s — Jul 27, 2026, 04:15:54 AM UTC the Massachusetts rules look like they provide for a reply to the answer if the court so orders, but that was entirely omitted here [0065] nicklaus_s — Jul 27, 2026, 04:16:34 AM UTC i will also notify the court that the parties intend to file motion and cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings, so thats all ur waiting on now [0066] split75th — Jul 27, 2026, 04:18:16 AM UTC Sounds good thank you for notice [0067] split75th — Jul 27, 2026, 07:40:19 PM UTC <@1118287020276592761> hi confirm you can speak here please [0068] josef13344 — Jul 27, 2026, 07:50:52 PM UTC Hello [0069] split75th — Jul 27, 2026, 07:55:06 PM UTC Awesome [0070] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 28, 2026, 01:50:47 AM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-3940 Status: PAID Total Cents: $0.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0071] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 28, 2026, 01:50:48 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-3940 Filing Code: MOTION Bates Number: BATES-20260728-1924119181 RW Courts • live docket update [0072] stickza — Jul 28, 2026, 01:51:07 AM UTC <@1463388891578110086> <@561923789152190466> We've filed our motion [0073] split75th — Jul 28, 2026, 04:15:03 AM UTC Will review now thank you! [0074] imnotrummy — Jul 28, 2026, 05:22:40 AM UTC Assigned to Judge <@456226577798135808> [0075] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 28, 2026, 05:22:47 AM UTC Embedded content: Case Docketed • RSC-CV-3940 Method: MANUAL Reason: Manual assignment RW Courts • live docket update [0076] imnotrummy — Jul 28, 2026, 05:23:42 AM UTC ||awesome that I just run assign and it automatically moves channel and website assignments around <@1069415674356715560> <@1463388891578110086> || [0077] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 28, 2026, 05:24:48 AM UTC Embedded content: Case Reassigned • RSC-CV-3940 Method: REASSIGNMENT Reason: Manual reassignment RW Courts • live docket update [0078] imnotrummy — Jul 28, 2026, 05:24:57 AM UTC Re-assigned actually, <@162074259835846656> is way more light [0079] imnotrummy — Jul 28, 2026, 05:25:02 AM UTC Docket is way more light * [0080] imnotrummy — Jul 28, 2026, 05:25:51 AM UTC <@162074259835846656> you never ran /chamber set…. [0081] kezzera — Jul 28, 2026, 05:51:00 AM UTC Courtroom 301 is now @AlbertWellesley’s chambers. Cases assigned to them will auto-file here. [0082] kezzera — Jul 28, 2026, 05:52:57 AM UTC <@561923789152190466> <@169925726949212160> Preserving continuity - already assigned magistrate will remain on this case [0083] kezzera — Jul 28, 2026, 05:53:01 AM UTC <@1118287020276592761> [0084] split75th — Jul 28, 2026, 05:54:55 AM UTC Very well [0085] imnotrummy — Jul 28, 2026, 05:58:20 AM UTC Most recent motion requires Judge [0086] kezzera — Jul 28, 2026, 09:11:42 AM UTC <@561923789152190466> JOTP was filed [0087] kezzera — Jul 28, 2026, 09:34:16 AM UTC <@169925726949212160> <@1118287020276592761> Is state the real party in interest here [0088] josef13344 — Jul 28, 2026, 10:15:11 AM UTC -she twists her hair into a bun.- [0089] josef13344 — Jul 28, 2026, 10:16:05 AM UTC Yes, your honor. Defendant is being sued in his official capacity as Colonel of the Ridgeway State Police [0090] nicklaus_s — Jul 28, 2026, 04:32:34 PM UTC yep [0091] nicklaus_s — Jul 28, 2026, 04:32:47 PM UTC can I have until end of week to file my cross motion? <@169925726949212160> <@1118287020276592761> [0092] nicklaus_s — Jul 28, 2026, 04:33:07 PM UTC i expect to be finished well before the weekend but they raised more points of contention than i had anticipated [0093] nicklaus_s — Jul 28, 2026, 04:34:01 PM UTC and then i will of course consent to whatever they need beyond the normal 48 hrs to file their response/ reply [0094] josef13344 — Jul 28, 2026, 04:39:32 PM UTC We propose 48 hours for a response. A week seems quite excessive and boisterous <@162074259835846656> [0095] nicklaus_s — Jul 28, 2026, 04:45:24 PM UTC up to and including Friday is fine by me [0096] kezzera — Jul 28, 2026, 09:49:36 PM UTC <@561923789152190466> Is there a reason why you need more than 48 hours [0097] stickza — Jul 28, 2026, 10:03:40 PM UTC We think 72 hours would be fair but object to anything more. [0098] stickza — Jul 28, 2026, 10:03:58 PM UTC (Starting from the time we filed our motion, of course) [0099] nicklaus_s — Jul 28, 2026, 11:21:35 PM UTC im asking for 48 hrs on top of that (friday) to write a motion + a response, which i dont think is particularly extraordinary or boisterous [0100] nicklaus_s — Jul 28, 2026, 11:21:56 PM UTC these issues are extraordinarily complex and i dont have hours to research and write each day [0101] nicklaus_s — Jul 28, 2026, 11:24:06 PM UTC i think the 2a challenge is the first of its kind here and requires reference to actual historical sources lol [0102] nicklaus_s — Jul 28, 2026, 11:25:31 PM UTC this case isnt particularly time-sensitive in that there is no tro or prelim injunc in place, and this case is surely moving faster than literally any other case in this court (see, e.g, <#1487276244151304192> filed in ridgemade) [0103] nicklaus_s — Jul 28, 2026, 11:25:53 PM UTC i think we all expect this case to end up on appeal so i dont think developing a complete record is particularly troublesome [0104] nicklaus_s — Jul 28, 2026, 11:26:54 PM UTC for the record, ive never held the opinion that dispositive motions (like the one here) should be run off the same 48-hr timer as discovery motions and the likes [0105] kezzera — Jul 29, 2026, 09:09:02 AM UTC <@561923789152190466> I can offer 72 or your requested 96 hours, each with 6 hours padded into it (because of my TZ) from the date of the motion's filing, but defendants do object to anything more than 72 so pick your poison [0106] kezzera — Jul 29, 2026, 09:09:25 AM UTC 72 is not unreasonable as requested in my opinion Nick [0107] kezzera — Jul 29, 2026, 09:09:59 AM UTC Going forward all cases must have a complete record [0108] kezzera — Jul 29, 2026, 09:10:26 AM UTC Hell would rain over us if anything went missing [0109] josef13344 — Jul 29, 2026, 11:19:57 AM UTC <@162074259835846656> please add Shah_khaled, Esquire, as co-counsel for Mattcern [0110] josef13344 — Jul 29, 2026, 11:20:08 AM UTC they are Assistant Solicitor General [0111] mattcern — Jul 29, 2026, 02:55:38 PM UTC Please dm me if you need anything from me, I probably won’t be checking this often. [0112] kezzera — Jul 29, 2026, 04:37:48 PM UTC they must use /noa [0113] nicklaus_s — Jul 29, 2026, 06:40:08 PM UTC well im gonna go with 96 hrs or wtv [0114] nicklaus_s — Jul 29, 2026, 06:40:19 PM UTC im not home tmrw and i wont be home this weekend and im busy today [0115] kezzera — Jul 30, 2026, 08:59:24 AM UTC <@561923789152190466> 72 hours from now, final deadline is: <t:1785661080:F> [0116] kezzera — Jul 30, 2026, 08:59:31 AM UTC that's being generous [0117] kezzera — Jul 30, 2026, 08:59:51 AM UTC i won't allow it again most likely without a formal extension motion [0118] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 1, 2026, 02:56:52 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-3940 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260728-1924119181 RW Courts • live docket update [0119] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 1, 2026, 02:56:55 PM UTC Embedded content: Motion Accepted — Briefing Clock Running **Motion** (`BATES-20260728-1924119181`) Opposition due <t:1785768970:F> (<t:1785768970:R>) — 48 hours after service (Rule 7.1(4)). Failure to respond within the period is deemed a waiver of opposition (Rule 7.1(9)). A reply is due within 24 hours after any opposition is served (Rule 7.1(5)). Periods run continuously in UTC (Rule 7.1(8)); anchor: clerk acceptance per the docket event [0120] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 2, 2026, 04:50:48 AM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-3940 Status: PENDING Total Cents: $60.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0121] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 2, 2026, 04:50:50 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-3940 Filing Code: MOTION Bates Number: BATES-20260802-9684143195 RW Courts • live docket update [0122] nicklaus_s — Aug 2, 2026, 04:53:20 AM UTC **PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS** https://rwcourts.org/api/v2/documents/cmsbbnuk300n7ne0xk58c9p5f/content > <@169925726949212160> <@162074259835846656> [0123] nicklaus_s — Aug 2, 2026, 04:53:40 AM UTC and we ofc consent to whatever time the gov needs to make their response in opp/reply in sup [0124] nicklaus_s — Aug 2, 2026, 04:59:08 AM UTC and I’ll note the court can narrow the injunction and declaratory relief sought in the complaint (so it’s not facial, but as applied) [0125] nicklaus_s — Aug 2, 2026, 04:59:33 AM UTC I think this case will obviously turn on whether arrests + citation = dangerous [0126] nicklaus_s — Aug 2, 2026, 04:59:55 AM UTC likely, there are some circumstances where section 414(b) or whatever can be applied to dangerous individuals [0127] nicklaus_s — Aug 2, 2026, 05:01:48 AM UTC so the court can just end up holding vehicle code violations ≠ dangerous (as applied), or plaintiff ≠ dangerous (as applied), or arrests + citations NEVER = dangerous (facial) [0128] nicklaus_s — Aug 2, 2026, 05:02:09 AM UTC lowk drafting oversight but shoot for the stars [0129] stickza — Aug 2, 2026, 03:20:27 PM UTC Currently moving, can file a response within 72 hours. [0130] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 3, 2026, 02:56:56 PM UTC Embedded content: Motion Ripe for Decision **Motion** (`BATES-20260728-1924119181`) stands submitted for decision (Rule 7.1(10)). No opposition was filed within 48 hours — opposition is deemed waived (Rule 7.1(9)); the motion is unopposed. The court may rule on the papers without further notice. Ripe-motion age is tracked in the daily docket health report [0131] stickza — Aug 3, 2026, 05:55:16 PM UTC <@162074259835846656> Is this true? ^ [0132] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 3, 2026, 10:28:15 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-3940 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260802-9684143195 RW Courts • live docket update [0133] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 3, 2026, 10:28:18 PM UTC Embedded content: Motion Accepted — Briefing Clock Running **Motion** (`BATES-20260802-9684143195`) Opposition due <t:1785968880:F> (<t:1785968880:R>) — 48 hours after service (Rule 7.1(4)). Failure to respond within the period is deemed a waiver of opposition (Rule 7.1(9)). A reply is due within 24 hours after any opposition is served (Rule 7.1(5)). Periods run continuously in UTC (Rule 7.1(8)); anchor: clerk acceptance per the docket event [0134] imnotrummy — Aug 4, 2026, 03:57:47 AM UTC It’s automated health checker disregard if he gave you extension [0135] imnotrummy — Aug 4, 2026, 03:57:56 AM UTC Gotta keep my judges on top of the ball or else they go to sleep [0136] stickza — Aug 4, 2026, 12:36:37 PM UTC Haha understood. Response being worked on now [0137] kezzera — Aug 5, 2026, 09:10:06 AM UTC Hello I'm back [0138] kezzera — Aug 5, 2026, 09:10:17 AM UTC An extra day for me because of the jetlag [0139] kezzera — Aug 5, 2026, 09:11:37 AM UTC I will note this is expected**: <t:1785943200:F> [0140] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 5, 2026, 09:11:46 AM UTC Embedded content: Record Notice — Message Edited The proceeding communications are a record of the court; no participant may edit or delete a message in them (Rule 60(5)(4)). Corrections are made by a new message. The original text is preserved below. Author: kezzera Originally sent: <t:1785921097:F> Original text: I will note this is due: <t:1785943200:F> Edited to: I will note this is expected**: <t:1785943200:F> Spoliation of a court record may be sanctionable (Rules 26.3(7), 53) [0141] kezzera — Aug 5, 2026, 09:12:00 AM UTC oh that's nice actually [0142] kezzera — Aug 5, 2026, 09:14:57 AM UTC MAKRED FOR REVIEW* PENDING RESPONSE [0143] stickza — Aug 5, 2026, 01:19:32 PM UTC <@162074259835846656> I am currently finishing up our response! [0144] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 5, 2026, 02:10:28 PM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-3940 Status: PAID Total Cents: $0.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0145] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 5, 2026, 02:10:29 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-3940 Filing Code: REPLY Bates Number: BATES-20260805-0213501835 RW Courts • live docket update [0146] stickza — Aug 5, 2026, 02:13:17 PM UTC https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_eAcnA7QPB94jlMqp4-rMNvo70zp7OEr/view?usp=sharing <@162074259835846656> <@561923789152190466> Response filed [0147] nicklaus_s — Aug 5, 2026, 03:06:38 PM UTC <@162074259835846656> leave to file reply? [0148] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 5, 2026, 04:07:36 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-3940 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260805-0213501835 RW Courts • live docket update [0149] kezzera — Aug 5, 2026, 07:40:59 PM UTC I will likely not permit further replies unless there's an exceptional reason for it, sorry [0150] kezzera — Aug 5, 2026, 07:43:19 PM UTC <@169925726949212160> <@561923789152190466> Good evening - will read today and determine whether a hearing is needed and how/when to dispose of this [0151] stickza — Aug 5, 2026, 07:49:58 PM UTC 10-4 [0152] nicklaus_s — Aug 5, 2026, 08:39:11 PM UTC i can go over why it’s necessary but this would be a normal reply in support of my cross motion like his [0153] nicklaus_s — Aug 5, 2026, 08:40:35 PM UTC his reply raises new arguments not addressed in any of the briefing so [0154] stickza — Aug 5, 2026, 08:45:39 PM UTC I would disagree, in part. We are not introducing any novel legal argument that this Court cannot analyze with the current briefing. The core elements are liberty, due process, and the second amendment. That’s it. Full stop. An additional reply will slow us down further and prolong this matter. [0155] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 5, 2026, 10:31:57 PM UTC Embedded content: Motion Ripe for Decision **Motion** (`BATES-20260802-9684143195`) stands submitted for decision (Rule 7.1(10)). No opposition was filed within 48 hours — opposition is deemed waived (Rule 7.1(9)); the motion is unopposed. The court may rule on the papers without further notice. Ripe-motion age is tracked in the daily docket health report [0156] josef13344 — Aug 6, 2026, 10:25:18 AM UTC I concur with Stickza's assessment. The tapestry is complete—another stitch changes nothing. [0157] nicklaus_s — Aug 6, 2026, 03:35:00 PM UTC Penelope is unraveling it [0158] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 7, 2026, 09:29:44 AM UTC Embedded content: Hearing Scheduled • RSC-CV-3940 Location: Courtroom 301 - EnforcementBeyond Memorial Courthouse 1 Jackson St, Palmer, RW Hearing Type: Hearing on JOTP Mot Scheduled At: <t:1786089600:F> (<t:1786089600:R>) RW Courts • live docket update [0159] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 7, 2026, 09:30:50 AM UTC Embedded content: Record Notice — Message Deleted The proceeding communications are a record of the court; no participant may edit or delete a message in them (Rule 60(5)(4)). Corrections are made by a new message. The original text is preserved below. Author: kezzera Originally sent: <t:1786095030:F> Original text: <@561923789152190466> <@1118287020276592761> <@169925726949212160> <@143422782347149312> See website for notes about hearing Spoliation of a court record may be sanctionable (Rules 26.3(7), 53) [0160] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 7, 2026, 09:32:02 AM UTC Embedded content: Hearing Scheduled • RSC-CV-3940 Location: Courtroom 301 - EnforcementBeyond Memorial Courthouse 1 Jackson St, Palmer, RW Hearing Type: Hearing on JOTP Mot (FIXED) Scheduled At: <t:1786165200:F> (<t:1786165200:R>) RW Courts • live docket update [0161] kezzera — Aug 7, 2026, 09:32:10 AM UTC IGNORE THIS ONE [0162] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 7, 2026, 11:43:38 AM UTC Embedded content: Record Notice — Message Deleted The proceeding communications are a record of the court; no participant may edit or delete a message in them (Rule 60(5)(4)). Corrections are made by a new message. The original text is preserved below. Author: kezzera Originally sent: <t:1786095150:F> Original text: <@561923789152190466> <@1118287020276592761> <@169925726949212160> <@143422782347149312> See website for notes about hearing Spoliation of a court record may be sanctionable (Rules 26.3(7), 53) [0163] kezzera — Aug 7, 2026, 11:44:40 AM UTC IGNORE THIS ONE [0164] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 7, 2026, 11:44:43 AM UTC Embedded content: Hearing Scheduled • RSC-CV-3940 Location: Courtroom 301 - EnforcementBeyond Memorial Courthouse 1 Jackson St, Palmer, RW Hearing Type: Hearing on JOTP Mot (FIXED AGAIN) Scheduled At: <t:1786122000:F> (<t:1786122000:R>) RW Courts • live docket update [0165] kezzera — Aug 7, 2026, 11:45:17 AM UTC THIS IS THE CORRECT ONE - SEE NOTES ON WEBSITE <@169925726949212160> <@561923789152190466> <@1118287020276592761> <@143422782347149312> [0166] stickza — Aug 7, 2026, 02:40:01 PM UTC <@162074259835846656> I don’t have ROBLOX downloaded anymore, nor do I get on. I just do this on Discord with some of my free time. I also have work today. Could we possibly postpone the hearing to a later date and do it over VC than in game? [0167] kezzera — Aug 7, 2026, 04:13:43 PM UTC What time do you propose? [0168] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 7, 2026, 04:36:15 PM UTC Embedded content: Record Notice — Message Edited The proceeding communications are a record of the court; no participant may edit or delete a message in them (Rule 60(5)(4)). Corrections are made by a new message. The original text is preserved below. Author: kezzera Originally sent: <t:1786119223:F> Original text: Could you propose a time? Edited to: What time do you propose? Spoliation of a court record may be sanctionable (Rules 26.3(7), 53) [0169] kezzera — Aug 7, 2026, 04:36:28 PM UTC thanks casehawk [0170] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 7, 2026, 05:00:15 PM UTC **DEADLINE REMINDER** - All parties Embedded content: DEADLINE DUE A deadline has now come due. Party: All parties Description: Hearing: Hearing on JOTP Mot (FIXED AGAIN) @ Courtroom 301 - EnforcementBeyond Memorial Courthouse 1 Jackson St, Palmer, RW Due Date: <t:1786122000:F> This deadline is now due [0171] kezzera — Aug 7, 2026, 07:15:03 PM UTC <@169925726949212160> I'll vacate this but I require an explicit time [0172] kezzera — Aug 7, 2026, 07:15:09 PM UTC and date stated [0173] nicklaus_s — Aug 7, 2026, 07:47:32 PM UTC I’m still being ignored as to the reply brief and half the hearing questions aren’t relevant because of it [0174] nicklaus_s — Aug 7, 2026, 07:49:28 PM UTC the government admits the guns are in common use so they can’t claim they’re dangerous and unusual [0175] nicklaus_s — Aug 7, 2026, 07:50:03 PM UTC all bearable arms are protected under the 2a, dangerous and unusual is a part of historical tradition, so their reply brief is mostly nonsense alongside the random affidavit cites [0176] nicklaus_s — Aug 7, 2026, 07:50:16 PM UTC and dangerous and unusual applies to the carrying of firearms, not possession [0177] nicklaus_s — Aug 7, 2026, 07:50:30 PM UTC the heller nonsense is all dicta too clarified in all the scotus decisions after it [0178] nicklaus_s — Aug 7, 2026, 07:51:31 PM UTC and dangerous and unusual is not similar here in any relevant aspect because it’s about an outright arms ban, not a licensing scheme where the government says some are worthy and some are not lol [0179] nicklaus_s — Aug 7, 2026, 07:52:52 PM UTC the government claiming none of this matters as to briefing because the second amendment and due process clause has been briefed in general is a dishonest half truth [0180] stickza — Aug 7, 2026, 08:26:48 PM UTC We are using the dangerous and unusual standard to show that these arms — which we never said are not bearable — to justify our regulation of assault weapons. Whether it is an outright ban or a restrictive licensing regime, that standard applies. And merely because we said they are common does not mean that we adulterated our argument with an acid pen. They are not common in the sense that they are used for self- defense, but rather to inflict mass casualties on the community. That is our stance, and it always has been. [0181] nicklaus_s — Aug 7, 2026, 10:39:31 PM UTC You’re using dangerous and unusual to say that they aren’t even protected by the 2a to avoid a liberty interest so I think that’s a mischaracterization [0182] nicklaus_s — Aug 7, 2026, 10:39:45 PM UTC <@162074259835846656> can i file a surreply bruh [0183] nicklaus_s — Aug 7, 2026, 10:41:39 PM UTC I mean dangerous and unusual nonsense should just be striken since it’s raised for the first time on reply [0184] nicklaus_s — Aug 7, 2026, 10:43:11 PM UTC And no doubt out of place given the admissions to 34 and 35 [0185] nicklaus_s — Aug 7, 2026, 10:44:10 PM UTC You did in fact admit they are in common use for defensive purposes (i.e. self defense) [0186] nicklaus_s — Aug 7, 2026, 10:44:53 PM UTC Again, this doesn’t matter since the dangerous and unusual historical tradition is not relevantly similar [0187] nicklaus_s — Aug 7, 2026, 10:46:45 PM UTC Even if it is, this still goes beyond the historical tradition because it covers mere possession, not just carrying [0188] nicklaus_s — Aug 7, 2026, 10:47:21 PM UTC And I would not be staking out my arguments here but I was denied leave to file a reply to their obviously new dangerous and unusual historical tradition argument, and then a hearing was scheduled with like 6 hour notice [0189] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 7, 2026, 10:49:12 PM UTC Embedded content: Record Notice — Message Edited The proceeding communications are a record of the court; no participant may edit or delete a message in them (Rule 60(5)(4)). Corrections are made by a new message. The original text is preserved below. Author: nicklaus_s Originally sent: <t:1786142842:F> Original text: And I would not be staking out my arguments here but I was denied leave to file a reply to their obviously new dangerous and unusual historical tradition, and then a hearing was scheduled with like 6 hour notice Edited to: And I would not be staking out my arguments here but I was denied leave to file a reply to their obviously new dangerous and unusual historical tradition argument, and then a hearing was scheduled with like 6 hour notice Spoliation of a court record may be sanctionable (Rules 26.3(7), 53) [0190] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 06:17:27 AM UTC I did say it was preliminary [0191] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 06:17:49 AM UTC <@169925726949212160> Given no explicit date and time stated I'll set this for a few days from noww [0192] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 06:17:59 AM UTC All questions I have presented ahead of time remains [0193] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 06:18:44 AM UTC I've presented an equal amount of concerns on both parties arguments [0194] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 06:19:26 AM UTC I'm sorry but wasn't this raised a while ago anyway? [0195] nicklaus_s — Aug 8, 2026, 06:25:41 AM UTC not sure i know what ur asking [0196] nicklaus_s — Aug 8, 2026, 06:25:51 AM UTC i asked for leave a few days ago and u said not without good cause [0197] nicklaus_s — Aug 8, 2026, 06:26:00 AM UTC which is weird since it’s a cross motion but it’s whatever [0198] nicklaus_s — Aug 8, 2026, 06:26:19 AM UTC felt like I’ve shown plenty of cause to file a reply brief but I’ve not been given an answer [0199] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 06:28:23 AM UTC The dangerous and unusual argument was raised in their JOTP noo? [0200] nicklaus_s — Aug 8, 2026, 06:37:22 AM UTC no the principal argument there is that they can disarm dangerous people [0201] nicklaus_s — Aug 8, 2026, 06:37:57 AM UTC the dangerous and unusual argument was raised for the first time in the reply, saying that the guns aren’t protected by the 2a because they are dangerous and unusual [0202] nicklaus_s — Aug 8, 2026, 06:38:36 AM UTC which is just nonsense based on the law and considering their admissions to the complaint [0203] nicklaus_s — Aug 8, 2026, 06:39:39 AM UTC and reading on dangerous and unusual I found helpful https://shared.nrapvf.org/sharedmedia/1512066/25-60102-brown-amicus-brief-_-stamped.pdf https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca5.223433/gov.uscourts.ca5.223433.50.2.pdf [0204] nicklaus_s — Aug 8, 2026, 06:41:07 AM UTC regardless I am considering just voluntarily dismissing though I’m sure everyone would be disappointed since this would be a big waste of time [0205] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 06:41:37 AM UTC <@561923789152190466> I'll grant sur-reply [0206] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 06:41:42 AM UTC You are correctt [0207] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 06:42:12 AM UTC This was raised for the first time [0208] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 06:42:44 AM UTC But you only get one, then we'll determine whether a hearing is necessary or not [0209] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 06:43:23 AM UTC I'll allow 48 hoours <@561923789152190466> [0210] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 06:43:41 AM UTC <@169925726949212160> <@1118287020276592761> [0211] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 06:43:42 AM UTC cc [0212] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 06:45:16 AM UTC If it's complete enough I can proceed with the papers and forgo hearing [0213] stickza — Aug 8, 2026, 01:30:45 PM UTC Mr. Nicklaus, I would appreciate it if you had kept your peace and avoided these subtle legal arguments, especially when I am asleep. This kind of comment is anathema to a respectful attorney. [0214] stickza — Aug 8, 2026, 01:34:54 PM UTC And I would further like to clarify that the dangerous and unusual argument *IS* being positioned as a historical tradition. We cited several instances in which dangerous weapons — comparable to the ones at issue here — were both federally and locally regulated (or otherwise prohibited) by the government. We aren’t saying that they aren’t entitled to 2a protections as a matter of plain text; we are saying that our licensing regime is supported by a wealth of history on regulating dangerous and unusual weapons. [0215] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 10:23:03 PM UTC I understood the position [0216] stickza — Aug 9, 2026, 04:29:45 AM UTC Good [0217] kezzera — Aug 9, 2026, 04:52:02 AM UTC After this one I intend to make a prompt decision I really do not want this to drag on for long [0218] kezzera — Aug 9, 2026, 04:52:11 AM UTC and no PLEASE NO MORE REPLIES [0219] stickza — Aug 12, 2026, 01:05:07 PM UTC <@162074259835846656> well I think we’re ready for a ruling [0220] kezzera — Aug 12, 2026, 02:07:26 PM UTC I think so too [0221] nicklaus_s — Aug 12, 2026, 03:55:33 PM UTC you can rule or I can dismiss [0222] nicklaus_s — Aug 12, 2026, 03:55:47 PM UTC I’ve talked to stickza and I don’t plan to do much more with this case cuz summers ending [0223] nicklaus_s — Aug 12, 2026, 03:55:57 PM UTC but we’ve written briefs so [0224] kezzera — Aug 12, 2026, 07:49:35 PM UTC Are you planning on dismissing this? [0225] nicklaus_s — Aug 12, 2026, 11:03:57 PM UTC well kinda up to if u want to write a ruling or not since we’ve came this far [0226] nicklaus_s — Aug 12, 2026, 11:04:11 PM UTC I still have standing and this isn’t moot so it’s not like u lose jurisdiction or anything [0227] nicklaus_s — Aug 12, 2026, 11:04:21 PM UTC but like I don’t plan on appealing if the ruling is egregious or smth [0228] nicklaus_s — Aug 12, 2026, 11:05:45 PM UTC I just don’t plan on attending hearings or prosecuting this further [0229] nicklaus_s — Aug 12, 2026, 11:06:03 PM UTC but we’re at the stage where dispositive motions are submitted and the only other thing needed is a ruling lol [0230] nicklaus_s — Aug 12, 2026, 11:06:38 PM UTC so stickza and I kinda mutually agreed to just let it play out [0231] nicklaus_s — Aug 12, 2026, 11:06:49 PM UTC but he can speak for himself <@169925726949212160> [0232] stickza — Aug 13, 2026, 02:08:02 AM UTC Yeah, I think we should go ahead and get a dispositive ruling on this issue, and if it works out in our favor, then that is it. And if it doesn’t, then voluntary dismissal would be in order. [0233] kezzera — Aug 13, 2026, 06:06:32 AM UTC That's fine gentlemen thank you [0234] imnotrummy — Aug 17, 2026, 03:57:56 AM UTC <@162074259835846656> [0235] kezzera — Aug 17, 2026, 07:28:22 AM UTC working thru [0236] nicklaus_s — Aug 18, 2026, 05:17:58 AM UTC let us know if questions im sure we can both briefly answer here [0237] kezzera — Aug 18, 2026, 08:50:30 AM UTC of course, thanks for telling me this :) [0238] stickza — Aug 21, 2026, 04:53:46 PM UTC <@162074259835846656> hey where do we stand here [0239] kezzera — Aug 21, 2026, 08:06:05 PM UTC writing stage [0240] kezzera — Aug 21, 2026, 08:06:18 PM UTC i also have a lot of other cases plus other duties to balance [0241] stickza — Aug 30, 2026, 04:35:15 PM UTC Any updates [0242] kezzera — Aug 31, 2026, 11:11:37 AM UTC been caught up with a lot of stuff, appreciate the patience - i understand its probably not usual [0243] stickza — Aug 31, 2026, 04:28:58 PM UTC No worries [0244] imnotrummy — Sep 6, 2026, 12:35:38 PM UTC <@162074259835846656> [0245] imnotrummy — Sep 9, 2026, 08:58:32 AM UTC <@162074259835846656> [0246] imnotrummy — Sep 12, 2026, 03:52:35 AM UTC <@162074259835846656> [0247] stickza — Sep 13, 2026, 01:51:31 PM UTC Well [0248] stickza — Sep 13, 2026, 01:51:39 PM UTC This is unfortunate [0249] nicklaus_s — Sep 13, 2026, 03:15:05 PM UTC https://tenor.com/view/its-over-it-is-over-it%27s-over-long-story-short-gif-15403500640504715592 Embedded content: Its Over It Is Over Meme - Its over It is over It's over - Discover & Share GIFs [0250] caseHAWK (BOT) — Sep 14, 2026, 01:04:05 PM UTC Embedded content: Case Reassigned • RSC-CV-3940 Method: REASSIGNMENT Reason: Manual reassignment RW Courts • live docket update [0251] imnotrummy — Sep 14, 2026, 01:04:40 PM UTC Re-assigned <@954458677086146682> . This is at final ruling stage. Please catch yourself up and handle it. Thank you. Unfortunately Mr. A. Wellesley is not able to provide a ruling [0252] imnotrummy — Sep 15, 2026, 06:56:48 AM UTC No comment ok? I’ll do it myself then [0253] caseHAWK (BOT) — Sep 15, 2026, 06:57:13 AM UTC Embedded content: Case Reassigned • RSC-CV-3940 Method: REASSIGNMENT Reason: Manual reassignment RW Courts • live docket update [0254] imnotrummy — Sep 15, 2026, 07:01:40 AM UTC Pursuant to Rid. R. Sup. Ct. 11(a), Chief Justice E. Warren presiding in the Superior Court [0255] caseHAWK (BOT) — Sep 15, 2026, 08:07:14 AM UTC Embedded content: Order Issued • RSC-CV-3940 Type: MOTION_RULING Title: ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS RW Courts • live docket update [0256] caseHAWK (BOT) — Sep 15, 2026, 08:07:15 AM UTC Order issued on **RSC-CV-3940**: ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Attachments: order_RSC-CV-3940.pdf — https://cdn.discordapp.com/ attachments/1530318883976642741/1549330747683242004/order_RSC-CV-3940.pdf? ex=6abc1a73&is=6abac8f3&hm=2970589d226973c4e34f01c46a2d5a852ba4c652b626f861fcd07c693eaa0ba7& [0257] imnotrummy — Sep 15, 2026, 08:08:08 AM UTC CC: <@169925726949212160> <@561923789152190466> [0258] imnotrummy — Sep 15, 2026, 08:08:16 AM UTC bcc: <@241312922440040448> <@404182916185456651> [0259] imnotrummy — Sep 15, 2026, 08:08:22 AM UTC sorry <@&955340954829733911> [0260] imnotrummy — Sep 15, 2026, 08:08:27 AM UTC <@&955340955542765599> [0261] imnotrummy — Sep 15, 2026, 08:50:31 AM UTC This does not reflect the full order but pleas make sure to get the following done in next 24; Within twenty-four (24) hours of entry of this order, Defendant shall furnish a copy of it to every member of the Ridgeway State Police who processes applications for Advanced Firearms Licenses, and shall file a notice on this docket confirming that he has done so and identifying the date and hour of compliance. Within twenty-four (24) hours of entry of this order, Defendant shall reconsider Plaintiff’s application of 21 June 2026 in a manner consistent with this order, and shall notify Plaintiff and this court of the result. Nothing in this order requires that the application be granted, and 9 R. Stat. § 413.102(a) and (c) continue to apply to it. Plaintiff’s as-applied claim under the Due Process Clause is RESERVED and is not adjudicated by this order. Plaintiff shall advise the court within twenty-four (24) hours whether he elects to pursue it or to withdraw it so that final judgment may be entered. [0262] josef13344 — Sep 15, 2026, 04:53:34 PM UTC "For it is blah-blah upon blah-blah, blah-blah upon blah-blah, gah-gah upon gah-gah, gah-gah upon gah- gah, a little here, a little there." Isaiah 28:10 [0263] imnotrummy — Sep 16, 2026, 06:10:51 AM UTC <@&955340954829733911> <@&955340955542765599> Confirm compliance through notice [0264] adam11244 — Sep 16, 2026, 09:27:35 PM UTC Yeah no crap dude [0265] imnotrummy — Sep 16, 2026, 11:41:05 PM UTC Order to show cause if not confirmed on this [0266] imnotrummy — Sep 16, 2026, 11:41:12 PM UTC Cc: <@826930712384766014> [0267] imnotrummy — Sep 16, 2026, 11:41:25 PM UTC You’re already over deadline [0268] adam11244 — Sep 17, 2026, 12:40:31 AM UTC Yeah sorry dude working like crazy. I’ve halted all afl reviews and <@1152551829801025557> or <@1345790477005361153> will follow up. I need a few days please [0269] mattcern — Sep 17, 2026, 01:09:53 AM UTC just got dm'd about this [0270] mattcern — Sep 17, 2026, 01:11:03 AM UTC so uhh [0271] mattcern — Sep 17, 2026, 01:11:12 AM UTC am i just sending the full 25 pages to firearm licensing unit <@1064220460184784979> [0272] mattcern — Sep 17, 2026, 01:15:31 AM UTC <@826930712384766014> [0273] imnotrummy — Sep 17, 2026, 01:23:37 AM UTC You halted all reviews after I issued the order [0274] imnotrummy — Sep 17, 2026, 01:24:02 AM UTC The review of one application, as required by the order, is required by law [0275] adam11244 — Sep 17, 2026, 01:24:30 AM UTC <@241312922440040448> re reviews his application please [0276] imnotrummy — Sep 17, 2026, 01:24:39 AM UTC I can sympathize with parties not an action to the case, however <@561923789152190466> AFL should’ve been re reviewed by now [0277] imnotrummy — Sep 17, 2026, 01:24:49 AM UTC Nothing in my order says as to the determination you need to come to of course [0278] adam11244 — Sep 17, 2026, 01:25:04 AM UTC It will be done [0279] imnotrummy — Sep 17, 2026, 01:25:19 AM UTC Thank you [0280] imnotrummy — Sep 17, 2026, 01:25:55 AM UTC Attachments: IMG_1044.webp — https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1530318883976642741/1549954521944428695/ IMG_1044.webp? ex=6abbbc62&is=6aba6ae2&hm=16d4da33a768edd6815e81ddff3c10d049c618c3b0c2e93af93e106ab9b8b600& [0281] adam11244 — Sep 17, 2026, 01:26:36 AM UTC https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1242328252744208425/1306715057819746305/ speechmemified_IMG_5024.png.gif Embedded content: [embed] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1242328252744208425/1306715057819746305/ speechmemified_IMG_5024.png.gif [0282] imnotrummy — Sep 17, 2026, 01:28:27 AM UTC Maintain decorum COUNSELOR [0283] adam11244 — Sep 17, 2026, 01:28:47 AM UTC https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1124802725436203038/1365753977182093352/Video.gif Embedded content: [embed] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1124802725436203038/1365753977182093352/Video.gif [0284] adam11244 — Sep 17, 2026, 01:28:49 AM UTC Sorry papi [0285] mattcern — Sep 17, 2026, 02:13:06 AM UTC whasts his full user [0286] mattcern — Sep 17, 2026, 02:13:10 AM UTC ill review it myself [0287] mattcern — Sep 17, 2026, 02:14:09 AM UTC and please dm me ts i do not check this discord at all [0288] mattcern — Sep 17, 2026, 02:14:19 AM UTC i said this 2 months ago when the case opened [0289] mattcern — Sep 17, 2026, 02:16:24 AM UTC and didnt you guys rape the things we could deny apps for anyways [0290] mattcern — Sep 17, 2026, 02:16:41 AM UTC doesnt everyone just get afls now for breathing oxygen [0291] imnotrummy — Sep 17, 2026, 02:41:21 AM UTC you may want to consult with your ro lawyer before falling to cognitive dissonance <@826930712384766014> of the masses [0292] imnotrummy — Sep 17, 2026, 02:41:28 AM UTC sorry tagged adam in wrong part [0293] imnotrummy — Sep 17, 2026, 02:41:41 AM UTC Nicklaus_s [0294] nicklaus_s — Sep 17, 2026, 08:43:53 PM UTC I could not give less of a care about ts case [0295] nicklaus_s — Sep 17, 2026, 08:44:09 PM UTC can the senate just hurry up and pass rathuzens act [0296] nicklaus_s — Sep 17, 2026, 08:44:18 PM UTC fixes all of this im pretty sure [0297] imnotrummy — Sep 18, 2026, 01:17:42 AM UTC Sonion that’s not how that works after order is entered [0298] imnotrummy — Sep 18, 2026, 01:17:53 AM UTC Unless you withdraw your application of course [0299] nicklaus_s — Sep 18, 2026, 03:50:02 AM UTC balright they also can’t just close afl applications for the whole state cuz of this [0300] nicklaus_s — Sep 18, 2026, 03:50:40 AM UTC sounds like a second amendment violation [0301] nicklaus_s — Sep 18, 2026, 03:50:44 AM UTC moving like prime hawaii [0302] nicklaus_s — Sep 18, 2026, 03:51:43 AM UTC See also [0303] nicklaus_s — Sep 18, 2026, 03:52:04 AM UTC https://tenor.com/view/kirk-franklin-apple-gif-13463445511350374882 Embedded content: Kirk Franklin Apple GIF - Kirk franklin apple - Discover & Share GIFs [0304] nicklaus_s — Sep 18, 2026, 03:54:28 AM UTC they also can’t do applications in cycles so that apps are closed longer than they are open [0305] nicklaus_s — Sep 18, 2026, 03:54:35 AM UTC sounds like an unconstitutional waiting period [0306] nicklaus_s — Sep 18, 2026, 03:54:37 AM UTC let’s lock in [0307] nicklaus_s — Sep 18, 2026, 03:55:17 AM UTC I compel Adam to work with the senate and pass a constitutional law instead of trying to write up a meritless appeal [0308] nicklaus_s — Sep 18, 2026, 03:56:28 AM UTC Cuz I won’t be briefing that frankly [0309] imnotrummy — Sep 18, 2026, 05:26:53 AM UTC this matter will be disposed per my order then, outside of appeal [0310] imnotrummy — Sep 18, 2026, 05:27:24 AM UTC <@241312922440040448> <@826930712384766014> Please confirm that Mr. Nicklaus_s's AFL application has been re-reviewed, the original deadline was 24 hours, to which it was extended to 48. [0311] imnotrummy — Sep 18, 2026, 05:27:31 AM UTC cc: <@&955340955542765599> [0312] mattcern — Sep 18, 2026, 05:33:14 AM UTC Ok whatever bro he passed his app [0313] mattcern — Sep 18, 2026, 05:33:23 AM UTC Congrats u have an afl now [0314] mattcern — Sep 18, 2026, 05:34:02 AM UTC im js gonna open apps and let every crim get an afl because thats basically what im getting out of this order [0315] mattcern — Sep 18, 2026, 05:34:09 AM UTC let the game go to shit and even more guns flood the street [0316] mattcern — Sep 18, 2026, 05:37:08 AM UTC <@1064220460184784979> what else do i need to do [0317] imnotrummy — Sep 18, 2026, 05:44:35 AM UTC Nothing [0318] imnotrummy — Sep 18, 2026, 05:45:05 AM UTC i would once against consult with <@826930712384766014> / or the head of the executive <@437742675287080962> as this is not what this order requires you to do [0319] mattcern — Sep 18, 2026, 05:49:29 AM UTC how many of these random shmuck criminals are convicted lol Attachments: image.png — https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1530318883976642741/1550383241100267571/image.png? ex=6abbfa29&is=6abaa8a9&hm=4eb3d5f9081a6f3c17103eef42c0ad7238bdd1d0d3c31d3a8e507e41d352fd9c& [0320] mattcern — Sep 18, 2026, 05:50:09 AM UTC we basically have just made it so all you need to get an afl is an rflid [0321] mattcern — Sep 18, 2026, 05:50:55 AM UTC i dont do this legal shit for a reason but am i missing something?? [0322] mattcern — Sep 18, 2026, 05:52:24 AM UTC https://legislature.rummytech.org/statutes#9%20R.%20Stat.%20§%20413.104 [0323] mattcern — Sep 18, 2026, 05:52:34 AM UTC and im p sure this makes it so i cant even deny applications [0324] imnotrummy — Sep 18, 2026, 06:02:25 AM UTC Attachments: IMG_1053.png — https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1530318883976642741/1550386494387265576/ IMG_1053.png? ex=6abbfd31&is=6abaabb1&hm=8e8a94517a094a4fd0bddc325fbcb1b9a6f6163c02e3e716317231d9cc8caa64& [0325] imnotrummy — Sep 18, 2026, 06:02:27 AM UTC You’re either trolling or can’t read [0326] imnotrummy — Sep 18, 2026, 06:02:50 AM UTC Nonetheless this is polluting the record, I’m not your attorney, you should consult with them for what it means [0327] imnotrummy — Sep 18, 2026, 06:03:30 AM UTC As we’ll be disposing this now, all parties are instructed to stop submitting oral arguments (discord chats) as to not pollute the record should this be appealed. [0328] imnotrummy — Sep 18, 2026, 06:03:45 AM UTC And thank you to <@169925726949212160> and <@561923789152190466> for your well thought out and argued briefs. Automatically generated by CaseHawk. This is a true and accurate transcript of the proceedings as recorded in the specified Discord channel.

transcript_nicklaus-s-v-mattcern_2026-09-29.pdf

Original document

Searchable full text

Document record