Ridgeway Unified Courts

JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF RIDGEWAY

Searchable full text

21,331 characters extracted

—

OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS Superior Court of the State of Ridgeway Category: Judge Singhski's Docket #state-v-65alper Archive Window: Jul 23, 2026, 12:04:05 AM UTC – Sep 19, 2026, 01:01:18 PM UTC Total Messages: 137 Timezone: UTC Message Log [0001] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 23, 2026, 12:04:05 AM UTC Embedded content: Case: RSC-CM-9608 State of Ridgeway v. 65alper Plaintiff(s): Arthur_Chen Defendant(s): 65alper Type: CRIMINAL Court: SUPERIOR Status: ACTIVE Presiding Judge: Unassigned Case Link: [View on RW Courts](https://rwcourts.org/case-details/RSC-CM-9608) RW Courts • live case record [0002] flimzee — Jul 23, 2026, 12:04:15 AM UTC assigned to <@456226577798135808> [0003] Deleted User — Jul 23, 2026, 12:25:11 AM UTC probable cause determination to summon defendant to be determined by Magistrate vonhagen [0004] Deleted User — Jul 23, 2026, 02:56:30 AM UTC <@1463388891578110086> [0005] split75th — Jul 23, 2026, 03:35:35 AM UTC Reviewing [0006] split75th — Jul 23, 2026, 03:52:06 AM UTC I find probable cause to summon the defendant, <@1069415674356715560> please issue summons [0007] Deleted User — Jul 23, 2026, 04:12:28 PM UTC <@1069415674356715560> [0008] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 23, 2026, 04:56:09 PM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CM-9608 Status: PAID Total Cents: $0.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0009] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 23, 2026, 04:56:10 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CM-9608 Filing Code: OTHER Bates Number: BATES-20260723-1046816556 RW Courts • live docket update [0010] flimzee — Jul 23, 2026, 04:56:24 PM UTC The clerk transmits the following summons which have also been uploaded to this case file: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZM7yRTYeYHK_cqN4TIE_nTHt4tE482vS/view?usp=sharing cc: <@456226577798135808> <@412736210985943060> [0011] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 23, 2026, 04:57:09 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CM-9608 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260723-1046816556 RW Courts • live docket update [0012] split75th — Jul 23, 2026, 07:37:30 PM UTC Thank you Halo [0013] split75th — Jul 25, 2026, 06:56:22 AM UTC <@412736210985943060> You can speak here, correct? [0014] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 25, 2026, 07:38:27 AM UTC Embedded content: NOTICE OF APPEARANCE An attorney has filed a Notice of Appearance in this case. Attorney: <@502637353140092930> Appearing on behalf of: 65alper (Defendant) Filed at: <t:1784965107:F> Entered on the court docket (BATES-20260725-6429811574) [0015] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 25, 2026, 07:38:31 AM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CM-9608 Status: PENDING Total Cents: $0.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0016] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 25, 2026, 07:38:32 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CM-9608 Filing Code: NOTICE_OF_APPEARANCE Bates Number: BATES-20260725-6429811574 RW Courts • live docket update [0017] roundsquare6018 — Jul 25, 2026, 07:38:39 AM UTC Duty counsel for the Defendant [0018] split75th — Jul 25, 2026, 07:46:25 AM UTC Phenomenal [0019] roundsquare6018 — Jul 25, 2026, 08:47:01 AM UTC <@1463388891578110086> I understand PC was found in-game and the State referes to DCE-2026-0007. Is there any way I am able to find this? I am assuming its just the officer's statement or a video. [0020] imnotrummy — Jul 25, 2026, 09:04:54 AM UTC Check duty court section of courts website [0021] imnotrummy — Jul 25, 2026, 09:05:02 AM UTC Or search up the number on court library [0022] roundsquare6018 — Jul 25, 2026, 09:14:41 AM UTC Ah I see, thank you! [0023] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 25, 2026, 11:25:34 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CM-9608 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260725-6429811574 RW Courts • live docket update [0024] split75th — Jul 25, 2026, 07:27:10 PM UTC Just got to see this, do you still need help sourcing the record? Or did CJs guidance help enough [0025] arthur_chen — Jul 25, 2026, 07:58:46 PM UTC I try not to use the information [0026] arthur_chen — Jul 25, 2026, 07:59:08 PM UTC <@1064220460184784979> Is there a way to allow state attorneys to opt out of using the pre-set form and draft our own criminal information on the refers [0027] imnotrummy — Jul 25, 2026, 11:29:30 PM UTC Do you use times new Roman and Adam documents? [0028] Deleted User — Jul 26, 2026, 12:49:34 AM UTC <@1069415674356715560> summon the defendant [0029] Deleted User — Jul 26, 2026, 12:49:42 AM UTC oh wait [0030] Deleted User — Jul 26, 2026, 12:49:43 AM UTC nvm [0031] Deleted User — Jul 26, 2026, 12:49:48 AM UTC wait until they have their CI filed [0032] roundsquare6018 — Jul 26, 2026, 01:18:03 AM UTC CJs helped me your Honor, and I can see the PC statement. [0033] roundsquare6018 — Jul 26, 2026, 02:59:02 AM UTC **PC STATEMENT** Subject drove at extremely dangerous speeds, with complete disregard for the safety of other road users and pedestrians, weaving within his lane, and eventually losing control of his vehicle and crashing into a pedestrian on the sidewalk at speed, causing significant injury. Subject attempted to run on foot very briefly upon confrontation; however, he was quickly tased and apprehended. Presented by theburnerphone · Palmer Police Department [0034] Deleted User — Jul 26, 2026, 03:10:27 AM UTC Arraignment: [0035] Deleted User — Jul 26, 2026, 03:10:34 AM UTC Defendant pled not guilty to Count I [0036] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 26, 2026, 04:32:08 AM UTC Embedded content: DEADLINE SET A new deadline has been imposed. Imposed On: <@201480567609360384> Set By: <@201480567609360384> Description: speedy trial deadline Due Date: <t:1786249928:F> (<t:1786249928:R>) A reminder will be sent when this deadline is due [0037] Deleted User — Jul 26, 2026, 04:32:20 AM UTC discovery is ordered to commence [0038] Deleted User — Jul 26, 2026, 04:32:40 AM UTC PH will be scheduled for tomorrow <@502637353140092930> <@412736210985943060> [0039] Deleted User — Jul 26, 2026, 04:33:05 AM UTC make sure to notify your witnesses [0040] roundsquare6018 — Jul 26, 2026, 08:17:12 AM UTC <@456226577798135808> Unfortunately I will be on travel by that time. Would the Court instead allow Defense to file its Motion to Reconsider Probable Cause? A PC hearing was already done, and wouldn't make sense to do it again with different people. This would give the State time to review and respond, and by then I will have returned from travels (on June 31) [0041] Deleted User — Jul 26, 2026, 02:45:21 PM UTC could you get another attorney assigned [0042] Deleted User — Jul 26, 2026, 02:45:56 PM UTC you can still file a paper motion [0043] Deleted User — Jul 26, 2026, 02:49:50 PM UTC and a PH for trial and arrest are two separate things [0044] Deleted User — Jul 26, 2026, 07:57:26 PM UTC <@412736210985943060> [0045] Deleted User — Jul 26, 2026, 07:57:29 PM UTC can you do ph today [0046] Deleted User — Aug 7, 2026, 08:05:24 PM UTC <@502637353140092930> I’m finding you in conflict and appointing <@622791808329580564> [0047] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 9, 2026, 04:32:17 AM UTC **DEADLINE REMINDER** - <@201480567609360384> Embedded content: DEADLINE DUE A deadline has now come due. Party: <@201480567609360384> Description: speedy trial deadline Due Date: <t:1786249928:F> This deadline is now due [0048] Deleted User — Aug 9, 2026, 04:33:10 PM UTC <@787131971796992010> <@412736210985943060> matter is being dismissed with prejudice, state has failed to prosecute. [0049] arthur_chen — Aug 9, 2026, 05:38:18 PM UTC Excuse me? <@456226577798135808> [0050] arthur_chen — Aug 9, 2026, 05:39:14 PM UTC I had no idea this was even in limbo [0051] arthur_chen — Aug 9, 2026, 05:39:30 PM UTC The defendant is the one who delayed this, not the state. [0052] arthur_chen — Aug 9, 2026, 05:39:53 PM UTC We will ask for fugitive status [0053] Deleted User — Aug 9, 2026, 11:17:35 PM UTC denied [0054] arthur_chen — Aug 10, 2026, 12:10:09 AM UTC Your honor, what authority do you have to dismiss a case WITH PREJUDICE sua sponte based on an alleged failure to prosecute? [0055] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 10, 2026, 12:10:25 AM UTC Embedded content: Record Notice — Message Edited The proceeding communications are a record of the court; no participant may edit or delete a message in them (Rule 60(5)(4)). Corrections are made by a new message. The original text is preserved below. Author: arthur_chen Originally sent: <t:1786320609:F> Original text: Your honor, what authority do you have to dismiss a case WITH PREJUDICE USA sponge based on an alleged failure to prosecute? Edited to: Your honor, what authority do you have to dismiss a case WITH PREJUDICE sua sponte based on an alleged failure to prosecute? Spoliation of a court record may be sanctionable (Rules 26.3(7), 53) [0056] arthur_chen — Aug 10, 2026, 12:10:41 AM UTC I see nothing in the rules that allows this <@456226577798135808> [0057] arthur_chen — Aug 10, 2026, 12:11:48 AM UTC <@456226577798135808> State demands a written order. We will be appealing [0058] funnypoliceman — Aug 10, 2026, 07:00:38 PM UTC The state *demands*? [0059] funnypoliceman — Aug 10, 2026, 07:01:02 PM UTC <@456226577798135808> Will the court permit such speech in its halls? How can a party *demand* something of this court? [0060] funnypoliceman — Aug 10, 2026, 07:01:27 PM UTC I'd like to rephrase, not permit, but respond to. [0061] arthur_chen — Aug 10, 2026, 07:33:34 PM UTC And an explanation for this extreme perversion of justice [0062] Deleted User — Aug 11, 2026, 12:19:08 AM UTC the speedy trial timer was set, and you were non responsive when I set for a PH [0063] Deleted User — Aug 11, 2026, 12:19:41 AM UTC this is the first I’ve heard from you since speedy trial was set [0064] Deleted User — Aug 11, 2026, 12:50:18 AM UTC also [0065] arthur_chen — Aug 11, 2026, 01:46:24 AM UTC Okay? They never filed a line for it [0066] arthur_chen — Aug 11, 2026, 01:46:38 AM UTC If they had requested it properly I would’ve been more than happy to provide it [0067] arthur_chen — Aug 11, 2026, 01:46:41 AM UTC But they never did [0068] Deleted User — Aug 11, 2026, 02:50:28 AM UTC Attachments: IMG_1969.png — https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1529640208537092250/1536567451360165968/ IMG_1969.png? ex=6aaf49f4&is=6aadf874&hm=8d74726ff5f6d526e2447409f1d080b6375166c63d48cb34036ade474ce95572& [0069] Deleted User — Aug 11, 2026, 02:51:32 AM UTC you’ve had two weeks to do *something* as the prosecutor it’s your responsibility to move the case forward [0070] arthur_chen — Aug 11, 2026, 03:18:31 AM UTC Arraignment never happened to my knowledge [0071] arthur_chen — Aug 11, 2026, 03:18:36 AM UTC So that rule doesn’t apply [0072] Deleted User — Aug 11, 2026, 06:19:48 AM UTC ^ [0073] Deleted User — Aug 11, 2026, 06:19:52 AM UTC <@412736210985943060> [0074] arthur_chen — Aug 11, 2026, 03:05:47 PM UTC Was he advised? You didn't even ping me [0075] arthur_chen — Aug 11, 2026, 03:06:05 PM UTC This is why we have documents like this [0076] arthur_chen — Aug 11, 2026, 03:06:06 PM UTC Attachments: image.png — https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1529640208537092250/1536752578099028018/image.png? ex=6aaf4d9e&is=6aadfc1e&hm=ba0fea98e85085758f6ec69947be0bf63134247ba279ac35ef97a89498ee0450& [0077] arthur_chen — Aug 11, 2026, 03:06:09 PM UTC So there's no confusion [0078] Deleted User — Aug 11, 2026, 04:33:52 PM UTC it was likely gamer who was duty counsel [0079] Deleted User — Aug 11, 2026, 04:34:05 PM UTC I did ping you for a PH [0080] arthur_chen — Aug 14, 2026, 07:16:28 PM UTC <@456226577798135808> Are we able to move on or are you going to issue dismissal? [0081] Deleted User — Aug 14, 2026, 08:45:13 PM UTC I’ll be issuing a dismissal in a few hours [0082] arthur_chen — Aug 15, 2026, 05:19:56 PM UTC Your honor I genuinely don’t understand how you can dismiss this with prejudice for failure to prosecute when you haven’t issued an order in a week [0083] caseHAWK (BOT) — Sep 6, 2026, 01:05:33 PM UTC Embedded content: Case Reassigned • RSC-CM-9608 Method: REASSIGNMENT Reason: Manual reassignment RW Courts • live docket update [0084] imnotrummy — Sep 9, 2026, 08:21:11 AM UTC <@412736210985943060> [0085] caseHAWK (BOT) — Sep 9, 2026, 08:21:26 AM UTC Embedded content: Case Reassigned • RSC-CM-9608 Method: REASSIGNMENT Reason: Manual reassignment RW Courts • live docket update [0086] caseHAWK (BOT) — Sep 9, 2026, 02:19:14 PM UTC Embedded content: Order Issued • RSC-CM-9608 Type: SCHEDULING Title: Recusal Order RW Courts • live docket update [0087] caseHAWK (BOT) — Sep 9, 2026, 02:19:15 PM UTC Order issued on **RSC-CM-9608**: Recusal Order Attachments: order_RSC-CM-9608.pdf — https://cdn.discordapp.com/ attachments/1529640208537092250/1547250039062007879/order_RSC-CM-9608.pdf? ex=6aaf42a3&is=6aadf123&hm=57f3e033a01dcba8e7d54bba52f4583a819bb0ac3520b7243cea27ae12943524& [0088] arthur_chen — Sep 9, 2026, 02:20:06 PM UTC <:SuperiorCourt:958243114999496744> | **RECUSAL ORDER** https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wJ4ijamWo1e9M336yKdAd8WuoGmy0dcM/view?usp=sharing CC: <@1069415674356715560> <@502637353140092930> Embedded content: State v. 65ALPER Recusal Order.pdf [0089] arthur_chen — Sep 11, 2026, 08:11:30 PM UTC <@&1482181543907557376> Still need this one reassigned. Perhaps to <@954458677086146682> as he currently has no cases [0090] flimzee — Sep 11, 2026, 08:16:12 PM UTC Attachments: r4s9p5v.png — https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1529640208537092250/1548064643187089428/ r4s9p5v.png? ex=6aaf964c&is=6aae44cc&hm=e923e3a542ece74f2b7316db4778582637cea8c79d7137e11f2854b08f1e30e3& [0091] flimzee — Sep 11, 2026, 08:16:19 PM UTC cc: <@412736210985943060> <@954458677086146682> [0092] caseHAWK (BOT) — Sep 11, 2026, 08:16:57 PM UTC Embedded content: Case Reassigned • RSC-CM-9608 Method: RECUSAL Reason: Judge recused, reassignment RW Courts • live docket update [0093] caseHAWK (BOT) — Sep 11, 2026, 08:17:37 PM UTC Embedded content: Case Docketed • RSC-CM-9608 Method: MANUAL Reason: Manual assignment RW Courts • live docket update [0094] singhski — Sep 13, 2026, 12:04:09 PM UTC <@622791808329580564> What’s going on with this? [0095] funnypoliceman — Sep 13, 2026, 12:06:23 PM UTC Your Honor, how can you preside upon this when you *were* previously counsel for the state in this matter? This is textbook conflict of interest! [0096] funnypoliceman — Sep 13, 2026, 12:06:43 PM UTC And as the previous presiding judge said, this matter is dismissed! [0097] funnypoliceman — Sep 13, 2026, 12:10:37 PM UTC I ask the court to ignore that message. [0098] funnypoliceman — Sep 13, 2026, 12:10:47 PM UTC I completely mixed up names here, that's entirely on me. [0099] funnypoliceman — Sep 13, 2026, 12:10:55 PM UTC I apologise for the mishap. [0100] funnypoliceman — Sep 13, 2026, 12:10:57 PM UTC A [0101] singhski — Sep 13, 2026, 12:14:53 PM UTC Apology accepted. Still, the question stands, where are we at? [0102] funnypoliceman — Sep 13, 2026, 12:15:12 PM UTC The previous judge said he'd dismiss the matter. [0103] funnypoliceman — Sep 13, 2026, 12:15:19 PM UTC ^^^^^^ [0104] singhski — Sep 13, 2026, 12:15:57 PM UTC Who is counsel for the State now that Mr. Chen has been called back into active service? [0105] singhski — Sep 13, 2026, 12:16:02 PM UTC Or is that something you wouldn’t know [0106] funnypoliceman — Sep 13, 2026, 12:16:26 PM UTC I'm unaware, I don't think the state appointed a new prosecutor. [0107] singhski — Sep 13, 2026, 12:16:51 PM UTC Right. <@826930712384766014> [0108] singhski — Sep 13, 2026, 08:12:01 PM UTC **PAPERLESS EX PARTE DISCLOSURE** Attachments: image.png — https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1529640208537092250/1548788363836924025/image.png? ex=6aaf9551&is=6aae43d1&hm=a2d64f9618ed8f8c848593161638f3880a6d0b1d00457451da9951272533a51f& [0109] singhski — Sep 13, 2026, 08:12:21 PM UTC Who are you appointing, General? <@826930712384766014> [0110] adam11244 — Sep 13, 2026, 08:12:49 PM UTC <@1152551829801025557> is the AAG and going forward should be contacted for all case assignments. I will allow him to sort this out in due course. [0111] singhski — Sep 13, 2026, 08:17:02 PM UTC Perfect. Mr. Wynne, who are you assigning, or are you representing the State yourself? <@1152551829801025557> [0112] wynneboy2010 — Sep 13, 2026, 08:17:34 PM UTC Your honor, for ease, I will be representing the state myself, let me file an NOA for this court [0113] singhski — Sep 13, 2026, 08:17:38 PM UTC I'm not comfortable reaffirming the previous judge's order until the State's interests are represented. [0114] singhski — Sep 13, 2026, 08:17:51 PM UTC Great, thank you. [0115] caseHAWK (BOT) — Sep 13, 2026, 08:17:55 PM UTC Embedded content: NOTICE OF APPEARANCE An attorney has filed a Notice of Appearance in this case. Attorney: <@1152551829801025557> Appearing on behalf of: Arthur_Chen (Plaintiff) Filed at: <t:1789330674:F> Entered on the court docket (BATES-20260913-7677760388) [0116] caseHAWK (BOT) — Sep 13, 2026, 08:17:58 PM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CM-9608 Status: PAID Total Cents: $0.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0117] caseHAWK (BOT) — Sep 13, 2026, 08:17:59 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CM-9608 Filing Code: NOTICE_OF_APPEARANCE Bates Number: BATES-20260913-7677760388 RW Courts • live docket update [0118] adam11244 — Sep 13, 2026, 08:18:14 PM UTC <@1152551829801025557> is this worth pursuing any further, is the defendant in this chat and engaging? [0119] wynneboy2010 — Sep 13, 2026, 08:19:13 PM UTC Let me look into this really quickly, and then I will get back to you. [0120] singhski — Sep 13, 2026, 08:19:39 PM UTC From my understanding of the record, the late Chief Judge intended to dismiss on speedy trial concerns/ failure to prosecute. At the same time, the defendant is a fugitive from justice? [0121] singhski — Sep 13, 2026, 08:20:46 PM UTC In the interest of maintaining the sanctity of the record, I kindly ask you deliberate elsewhere [0122] wynneboy2010 — Sep 13, 2026, 08:21:16 PM UTC Yes, your honor, we will [0123] wynneboy2010 — Sep 13, 2026, 08:25:02 PM UTC Your honor, the state would like to dismiss this case without prejudice, Would you like a normal motion or will this suffice. cc <@954458677086146682> <@622791808329580564> [0124] caseHAWK (BOT) — Sep 13, 2026, 08:56:19 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CM-9608 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260913-7677760388 RW Courts • live docket update [0125] singhski — Sep 14, 2026, 03:00:27 PM UTC Counsel, while you enjoy a good faith presumption, I will not grant a motion to dismiss without prejudice until I review the late Chief Judge’s reasoning. When a judge decides to dismiss with prejudice, it is often the case that there is a severe, unfixable flaw warranting with prejudice. [0126] singhski — Sep 14, 2026, 03:01:44 PM UTC It would be much more helpful for you to explain, as Mr. Chen briefly attempted to do when he was counsel, why the Chief Judge Mytrius’ intended decision (dismissal on speedy trial grounds) would be erroneous. [0127] singhski — Sep 18, 2026, 09:25:40 AM UTC <@1152551829801025557> [0128] singhski — Sep 18, 2026, 09:26:02 AM UTC I must say, your disinterest doesn’t do much against the failure to prosecute concerns [0129] caseHAWK (BOT) — Sep 18, 2026, 09:26:19 AM UTC Embedded content: Record Notice — Message Edited The proceeding communications are a record of the court; no participant may edit or delete a message in them (Rule 60(5)(4)). Corrections are made by a new message. The original text is preserved below. Author: singhski Originally sent: <t:1789723562:F> Original text: I must say, your disinterest doesn’t do much against the speedy trial concerns Edited to: I must say, your disinterest doesn’t do much against the failure to prosecute concerns Spoliation of a court record may be sanctionable (Rules 26.3(7), 53) [0130] wynneboy2010 — Sep 18, 2026, 11:37:28 AM UTC Apologies your honor. However, the late Judge Mytrius slated this case to be closed, we ask that the court reflect that decision [0131] singhski — Sep 18, 2026, 11:49:41 AM UTC You’re not contesting a dismissal with prejudice? [0132] wynneboy2010 — Sep 18, 2026, 04:43:36 PM UTC No, from reading we failed to prosecute and that was the ruling by the last judge Mytrius. [0133] singhski — Sep 18, 2026, 05:08:07 PM UTC Great, I will dismiss this with prejudice, paper order will be circulated soon. Thank you. [0134] singhski — Sep 19, 2026, 12:31:51 PM UTC ** <:SuperiorCourt:958243114999496744> | ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE** https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Xi0vHZ5abfzOXHwyzLwQSDB738DgTMLV/view?usp=sharing Cc: <@622791808329580564> <@1152551829801025557> <@1069415674356715560> <@242876771387572224> Embedded content: FINALORDER RSC-CM-9608.pdf [0135] caseHAWK (BOT) — Sep 19, 2026, 01:00:38 PM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CM-9608 Status: PAID Total Cents: $0.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0136] caseHAWK (BOT) — Sep 19, 2026, 01:00:38 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CM-9608 Filing Code: OTHER Bates Number: BATES-20260919-9091861728 RW Courts • live docket update [0137] caseHAWK (BOT) — Sep 19, 2026, 01:01:18 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CM-9608 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260919-9091861728 RW Courts • live docket update Automatically generated by CaseHawk. This is a true and accurate transcript of the proceedings as recorded in the specified Discord channel.

transcript_state-v-65alper_2026-09-19.pdf

Original document

Searchable full text

Document record