IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RIDGEWAY
FOR THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
HALO4ASIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
RIDGEWAY PARKS SERVICE,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. RSC-CV-0750
DECLARATION OF HALO4ASIN
DECLARATION OF HALO4ASIN IN SUPPORT OF SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION
I, Halo4asin, declare as follows based upon my personal knowledge:
1. I am the Plaintiff in this action and submitted the RPS application that is the subject of
the Court’s August 20, 2026 reevaluation order.
2. On August 21, 2026, the RPS application coordinator communicated with me about the
reevaluation. After I provided the information showing that the remaining moderation
action had been appealed, he stated, “for now I see no reason to not pass you,” and then
stated that he would hand the matter to Superintendent ItzCrazyAaron.
3. The tracker later reflected my Final Screening as Passed and my Final Outcome as
Failed.
4. On September 13, 2026, I sent separate written requests to the Superintendent and the
application coordinator requesting the specific reason for the failed Final Outcome, the
criterion or authority relied upon, the factual basis, and who made or approved the
determination.
5. At approximately 7:42 PM Eastern Time on September 13, I checked the tracker and
observed the Final Outcome was marked Failed without a note or reason. I
contemporaneously told the application coordinator that no note had been provided and
preserved a screenshot of the tracker.
6. The application coordinator told me that the background check stage was complete, that
he was no longer responsible for the outcome stage, and that I should refer the question to
the Superintendent.
7. After that exchange, the tracker displayed a new statement: “Applicant failed based on 4
R. Stat. § 121.102(e) as of 9/14/2026 3:02 AM HKT. Applicant’s character outweighs
any other merits demonstrated.”
8. I reviewed RPS’s own database entries listing personnel timezones. In that database,
BobbyBobitheBobbian/lspdunit234 is the only RPS person I observed whose listed
timezone is HKT.
9. I understand that the timezone notation by itself does not conclusively establish who
authored the entry. I offer that fact because it is consistent with the application
coordinator having knowledge of or involvement in the entry and because the tracker
version history should be able to establish authorship directly.
10. Before the new § 121.102(e) statement appeared, I had not been given any factual
allegation identifying a character defect or explaining how my character would harm the
Parks Service or community.
11. I have preserved the relevant Discord communications and tracker screenshots in
substantially the same condition in which I received or observed them.
I declare that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and recollection.
Respectfully Submitted,
_________________________
Halo4asin
Plaintiff, Pro Se
Dated: September 14, 2026
