1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PAGE - 1 -
PROPOSED—NOT AN ORDER — EXPEDITED REVIEW OF TESTIMONY
imnotRummy — self-represented nonparty proposed witness
Filing username: imnotRummy
SUPERIOR COURT OF RIDGEWAY
COUNTY OF RIDGEWAY
thr33six8, Case No. RSC-CV-8427
Plaintiff,
vs. PROPOSED—NOT AN ORDER
AlbertWellesley, in his official capacity, — EXPEDITED REVIEW OF
rashhyyyy, TESTIMONY
Complainants (pseudonymous defendants),
Defendants.
Dated September 9, 2026, at 11:51:29 UTC.
Matter presented
The Court considers imnotRummy’s request for an initial protective and
scheduling determination on his emergency nonparty motion. The proposed interim
directions preserve a ruling on admissibility and do not finally establish any privilege,
exclude a witness, or decide a claim or defense. The Court must independently
determine whether expedited or interim relief is warranted.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PAGE - 2 -
PROPOSED—NOT AN ORDER — EXPEDITED REVIEW OF TESTIMONY
Proposed disposition
1. imnotRummy may appear solely as a nonparty proposed witness for this
application. To the extent necessary, leave is granted under Rid. R. Evid.
103(6)(1) and 702(4)(2). He is not joined as a party. This order is entered
by another judicial officer.
2. Under Civil Rule 7.1(7), opposition is due within twelve (12) hours after
system service of this order. Any reply is due within six (6) hours after
service of opposition. The Court may enlarge these periods or set a
hearing as fairness requires. Unknown positions are not consent.
3. Within the opposition period, Plaintiff shall identify each factual topic or
opinion sought from imnotRummy, expected testimony, relevance,
foundation, and reason the court record does not supply the proof. Plaintiff
may instead withdraw the designation from use without altering any
existing filing.
4. Pending a preliminary ruling, no party shall call imnotRummy or elicit his
testimony under the current designation. This direction does not stay the
case or other discovery. An affected party may request prompt modification
or dissolution.
5. After the parties are heard, the Court will determine the permissible scope
under Evidence Rules 104, 501, 510, 602, 605(7), and 702, including
legal-opinion restrictions and judicial deliberation privilege. No item is
adjudged privileged by category. Any necessary review of privileged
material shall follow Rule 501, without uploading it to the public filing
system.
6. No document is deleted, changed, or sealed, and no subpoena is
quashed. Rule 19(7) protection awaits an actual discovery demand and
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PAGE - 3 -
PROPOSED—NOT AN ORDER — EXPEDITED REVIEW OF TESTIMONY
the required showing. No claim, defense, or eligibility to adjudicate another
proceeding is decided. Other relief is reserved.
Submitted by /s/ imnotRummy — Nonparty Movant.
