1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PAGE - 1 -
Complaint TheUnkownSavagx v. canyoudrown
TonyBlony492,RBN;19309
Filing username: TonyBlony492
SUPERIOR COURT OF RIDGEWAY
COUNTY OF RIDGEWAY
COUNTY OF RIDGEWAY
TheUnknownSavagx, Case No. To be assigned
Plaintiff,
vs. Complaint TheUnkownSavagx
canyoudrown, v. canyoudrown
Defendant.
Jurisdiction, Venue, Parties, Statement of Facts and Counts/Torts.
JURISDICTION
This Court has original jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 3 R. Stat. §
131.004(c), which grants the Superior Court of the State of Ridgeway original jurisdiction
over all civil claims. This Court also has jurisdiction under 7 R. Stat. § 131.107(b)
because Defendant committed tortious acts within this State.
VENUE
Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 7 R. Stat. § 131.001 because the
causes of action occrued in the county where the State Capitol Building is located.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PAGE - 2 -
Complaint TheUnkownSavagx v. canyoudrown
PARTIES
Plaintiff TheUnknownSavagx is a resident of the State of Ridgeway and was the
individual arrested in the incident giving rise to this action. Defendant canyoudrown is a
peace officer employed by Ridgeway State Police and is sued in his individual capacity
and in his official capacity as a peace officer.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
1. On or about 09/05/2026, the Plaintiff has entered the State Capitol Building
and walked through a metal detector.
2. The metal detector produced a negative (no metal) result.
3. Officer nisicult, which was present at the scene has stated that the Plaintiff
was clear.
4. Defendant canyoudrown then placed Plaintiff under arrest.
5. The Defendant has charged the Plaintiff with R.C.C. § 4.18 (Trespassing).
6. The Plaintiff was taken into custody as a result of the arrest.
7. The arrest occurred after Plaintiff had cleared the metal detector and after
another officer had indicated that Plaintiff was clear.
8. Thus, no legal justification existed for the arrest.
9. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant’s conduct, Plaintiff was
deprived of his liberty and suffered injury.
TORTS
Count I - False Imprisonment (7 R. Stat. § 121.003)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PAGE - 3 -
Complaint TheUnkownSavagx v. canyoudrown
• Defendant, acting under color of law, intentionally restrained Plaintiff’s
freedom of movement by placing him under arrest and taking him into
custody.
• At the time of the arrest, Plaintiff has been cleared by two independent
sources, which were the metal detector, that has produced a negative
result, and by an officer called nisicult, which has stated that the Plaintiff
was clear.
• Therefore, the arrest was without legal authority or justification, which
satisfies the legal bar and the legal definition to establish a valid tort claim
under the definition of false imprisonment, as defined under 7 R. Stat. §
121.003.
• As a direct result of Defendant’s conduct, Plaintiff suffered deprivation of
liberty and is entitled to compensatory and punitive damages.
7 R. Stat. § 121.003 FALSE IMPRISONMENT — Any individual who,
without legal authority or justification, restrains or restricts a person’s
movement within an area, or restrains the person’s permission commits
false imprisonment and shall be liable for punitive damages of up to
$6,000.00
Count II - Deprivation of rights under the color of law (7 R. Stat. § 121.403)
• Defendant, acting under color of statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or
usage, subjected Plaintiff to the deprivation of rights, privileges, and
immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the State of Ridgeway,
including the right to liberty and freedom from unreasonable seizure.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PAGE - 4 -
Complaint TheUnkownSavagx v. canyoudrown
• The Defendant has arrested the Plaintiff after the Plaintiff has been cleared
by the metal detector and after officer nisicult has stated that the Plaintiff
was clear.
• Thus, the arrest lacked legal justification.
• Therefore, the Plaintiff is entitled to redress, including compensatory
damages and such equitable relief as the Court deems proper.
7 R. Stat. § 121.403 DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF
LAW - Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation,
custom, or usage, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the
State of Ridgeway or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the
deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the
Constitution and laws, commits deprivation of rights under color of law and
shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other
proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a
judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial
capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree
was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable.
Count III - Official Misconduct (7 R. Stat. § 121.404)
• The Defendant is a public servant.
• The Defendant has committed an act relating to his office which
constituted an unauthorized exercise of his official functions, knowing that
such act was unauthorized, by arresting Plaintiff without legal justification
after Plaintiff had cleared the metal detector and after officer nisicult has
stated that the Plaintiff was clear.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PAGE - 5 -
Complaint TheUnkownSavagx v. canyoudrown
• Defendant’s official misconduct caused concrete injury to Plaintiff,
including deprivation of liberty.
• Plaintiff is entitled to compensatory damages, punitive damages up to
$10,000.00, and injunctive or other appropriate relief.
• This claim is brought in accordance with 7 R. Stat. § 121.404(b)–(d).
7 R. Stat. § 121.404 OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT — Any individual who is a
public servant and commits an act relating to his office but constitutes an
unauthorized exercise of his official functions, knowing that such act is
unauthorized; or refrains from performing a duty which is imposed upon
him by law or is clearly inherent in the nature of his office commits official
misconduct and shall be liable liable for compensatory damages; injunctive
reliefs restraining the individual from performing a certain action, or orders
instructing the individual to perform a certain action; and punitive damages
of up to $10,000.00.
Prayer for Relief
THEREFORE, the Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court to:
On Count I – False Imprisonment (7 R. Stat. § 121.003):
(i) Enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant;
(ii) Award Plaintiff compensatory damages in an amount to be proven at trial;
(iii) Award Plaintiff punitive damages in an amount up to $6,000.00 as
authorized by 7 R. Stat. § 121.003;
On Count II - Deprivation of Rights under color of law (7 R. Stat. § 121.403)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PAGE - 6 -
Complaint TheUnkownSavagx v. canyoudrown
(i) Enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant;
(ii) Award Plaintiff compensatory damages in an amount to be proven at trial;
(iii) Grant appropriate injunctive, declaratory, or other equitable relief;
On Count III – Official Misconduct (7 R. Stat. § 121.404)
(i) Enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant;
(ii) Award Plaintiff compensatory damages in an amount to be proven at trial;
(iii) Award Plaintiff punitive damages in an amount up to $10,000.00 as
authorized by 7 R. Stat. § 121.404;
(iv) Grant appropriate injunctive or other relief;
On all Counts
(i) Award Plaintiff the costs of this action; and
(ii) Grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
