IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RIDGEWAY
FOR THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
HALO4ASIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
RIDGEWAY PARKS SERVICE,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. RSC-CV-0750
NOTICE AND MOTION
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE AND MOTION TO ENFORCE
AUGUST 20, 2026 ORDER
Plaintiff Halo4asin, appearing pro se, respectfully gives notice that Defendant has not completed
the relief requested by the Court’s August 20, 2026 order within the time allowed, and moves for
enforcement of that order.
I. THE AUGUST 20 ORDER
1. On August 20, 2026, the Court granted in part Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary
judgment and directed Defendant to vacate the “Failed” Final Screening result recorded
for Plaintiff in the Ranger Class 22 application tracker, Entry No. 26.
2. The Court further directed Defendant to reevaluate Plaintiff’s application, in particular
the background investigation, in conformity with 4 R. Stat. § 122.402 within seven (7)
days of the order.
3. The Court expressly stated that any extension of that deadline was required to be
requested before the deadline expired.
4. On August 23, 2026, Superintendent ItzCrazyAaron acknowledged the order after being
directed by the Court to do so.
II. EXPIRATION OF THE COMPLIANCE PERIOD
5. The order was issued on August 20, 2026 at approximately 9:47 PM. The seven day
compliance period therefore expired on August 27, 2026.
6. As of August 28, 2026, Plaintiff has not received a complete reevaluation, a replacement
background determination, or a new final application determination from Defendant.
7. Plaintiff further observes that the Prior Ranger Class 22 tracker entry associated with
Plaintiff no longer appears on the application spreadsheet. To the extent removal of that
entry constituted compliance with the Court’s direction to vacate the prior failed result,
Plaintiff does not dispute that portion of compliance in this motion.
8. The removal of the prior entry, however, does not itself complete the separately ordered
reevaluation. Plaintiff has not been provided a new determination reflecting completion
of the reevaluation required by the August 20 order.
9. Plaintiff is not aware of any request by Defendant, made before expiration of the
deadline, seeking no additional time to comply.
III. DEFENDANT HAD NOTICE AND AN OPPORTUNITY TO COMPLETE THE
REEVALUATION
10. Before expiration of the deadline, Plaintiff provided Defendant with additional
information relevant to the ordered background reevaluation, including information
concerning the status of prior disciplinary and moderation related records and evidence
addressing any alternate account concern.
11. Defendant’s application coordinator communicated with Plaintiff concerning possible
grounds under 4 R. Stat. § 122.402 and ultimately indicated that Superintendent
ItzCrazyAaron would handle the result. Despite those communications, no completed
determination was communicated to Plaintiff before the deadline.
12. Plaintiff therefore submits that the present issue is not whether Defendant had notice of
the order or an opportunity to conduct the reevaluation, but whether the ordered
reevaluation was completed within the seven day period fixed by the Court.
IV. RELIEF REQUESTED
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court enforce its August 20, 2026 order
and direct Defendant to complete and communicate the ordered reevaluation within twenty four
(24) hours of the Court’s enforcement order. In the alternative, Plaintiff requests that Defendant
be ordered to show cause why the August 20 order was not completed within the time required.
Plaintiff does not presently request sanctions and seeks only prompt compliance with the relief
already ordered.
Respectfully Submitted,
_________________________
Halo4asin
Plaintiff, Pro Se
Dated: August 29, 2026
