IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RIDGEWAY
FOR THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
HALO4ASIN
Plaintiff,
v.
RIDGEWAY COUNTY SHERIFF’S
OFFICE;
ERRCORE, in his official capacity;
AZAP634, in his official capacity,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. RSC-CV-5191
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE
REASSIGNMENT
TO THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF
RIDGEWAY, IN THEIR ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY:
Plaintiff Halo4asin, appearing pro se, respectfully requests administrative reassignment of
RSC-CV-5191 to another active Judge of the Superior Court, or such other administrative action
as the Supreme Court deems appropriate to secure prompt disposition of the pending matters.
This request is not a motion for recusal, does not allege judicial bias or misconduct, and does not
ask any prior ruling or filing be disturbed.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
1. On August 8, 2026, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Extend the Discovery Deadline as to
depositions. That motion was accepted on August 9, 2026 and became ripe for decision
on August 11, 2026.
2. The requested extension was necessary because discovery could not be completed while
information previously ordered from the State remained outstanding, including names
necessary to conduct depositions.
3. On August 15, 2026, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Compel Compliance addressing
outstanding discovery and prior directives of the Court. That motion was accepted on
August 16, 2026 and became ripe and unopposed on August 18, 2026.
4. Among the matters identified as outstanding were the names previously directed to be
produced, notice concerning material claimed to be classified under 4 R. Stat. §
122.208(b), and responses or objections to Plaintiff’s interrogatories.
5. Plaintiff requested status updates after the motions became ripe. On August 20, 2026 at
4:20 PM, Judge Mytrius stated: “I’ll look at it this weekend.”
6. Plaintiff followed up on August 22, August 24, and August 26. As of the filing of this
motion, no ruling has been entered on the pending discovery motions and the discovery
motions and the discovery issues remain unresolved.
II. BASIS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REASSIGNMENT
7. The Constitution of the State of Ridgeway places administrative control of the courts in
the Supreme Court. Plaintiff therefore directs this request to the Supreme Court in its
administrative capacity.
8. The basis for this request is practical rather than personal. The litigation cannot
meaningfully advance while the discovery extension and motion to compel remain
undecided. The delay now extends beyond one week from the Court’s August 20
representation that the matters would be reviewed that weekend, and substantially longer
from the dates on which the motions themselves became ripe.
9. Reassignment would not require the case to restart. Plaintiff asks that all prior records,
filings, briefings, discovery, docket events, and pending motions remain intact, and that
any newly assigned judge take the matter in its present posture.
10. Plaintiff further notes that, because Plaintiff separately serves as the Clerk of the Superior
Court, Plaintiff does not seek to exercise any discretionary clerk authority over
assignment of this case. Plaintiff submits this request solely in the capacity of a litigant
and leaves the administrative determination entirely to the Supreme Court.
III. RELIEF REQUESTED
11. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Supreme Court, in its
administrative capacity: (1) administratively reassign RSC-CV-5191 to another active
Superior Court Judge; (2) preserve all prior orders, filings, briefing, discovery, and
pending motions without requiring the proceedings to restart; and (3) grant such other
administrative relief as may be necessary to secure prompt disposition of the pending
discovery matters.
Respectfully Submitted,
_________________________
Halo4asin
Plaintiff, Pro Se
Dated: August 28, 2026
