IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RIDGEWAY
FOR THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
HALO4ASIN
Plaintiff,
v.
RIDGEWAY COUNTY SHERIFF’S
OFFICE;
ERRCORE, in his official capacity;
AZAP634, in his official capacity,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. RSC-CV-5191
NOTICE
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Plaintiff respectfully notifies the Court of developments occurring after the operative pleadings,
which bear on the claims at issue. Plaintiff does not by this Notice seek leave to amend, and does
not ask the Court to adjudicate these events. Plaintiff submits them so that the record is complete
and so that they may be addressed in discovery and at such further proceedings as the Court
directs.
I. THE BACKGROUND INVESTIGATON RESULT
1. Plaintiff’s application results tracker now reflects that Plaintiff passed the background
investigation conducted by the Ridgeway County Sheriff’s Office.
2. That result was reached on the same account, by the same agency, under the background
investigation criteria of 4 R. Stat. Section 122.402, that in May 2026 produced the
negative determination challenged in this action.
3. The factors identified in the Defendants’ sworn Background Investigation Transcription
as indicative of an alternate account were account age, badge count, clothing and
gamepass inventory, group affiliations, friend and follower counts, and message volume.
Those are attributes of the account itself. Plaintiff states, and the Defendants are free to
dispute, that no material change in those attributes occurred between the two
determinations.
II. THE DECISION AND OUTCOME ENTRIES
4. Notwithstanding the passing background investigation result, the tracker reflects a
determination of “Failed” at the stage described as “Decision from Central Command and
the Application Committee on your acceptance,” and a determination of “Failed” at the
stage described as “Outcome.”
5. No reason accompanies either entry. No criterion is cited. No statutory provision is
identified. Unlike the May 2026 determination, which at least cited a criterion, these
entries state only the word “Failed.”
III. RELEVANCE TO THE PENDING CLAIMS
6. 4 R. Stat. Section 122.308 provides that where an appointing authority determines an
applicant lacks the minimum qualifications or the selective criteria for the position, “the
applicant shall be notified of the reasons for the determination.” Subsection (a) provides
that the authority “may meet this requirement by publishing their reasoning on an
application results tracker accessible to the applicant.” The tracker is a mechanism the
statute contemplates, and it carries no reasoning.
7. 4 R. Stat. Section 122.306 provides that the specifications of the position, and where
applicable the selective criteria set forth in the vacancy posting, “shall be the primary
basis and source of authority for evaluating” an application. No such basis has been
identified for either determination.
8. 4 R. Stat. Section 121.103 requires an appointing authority to indicate all attributes of
merit and demerit relied upon during the vacancy process.
9. Plaintiff notes these provisions because the conduct alleged in Counts I, II, and VI of the
operative Complaint is the entry of an adverse determination without the specification of
reasoning the statutes require. Plaintiff respectfully submits that the entries described
above reflects the same practice, and are relevant to the propriety of the injunctive relief
sought.
IV. RESERVATION
10. Plaintiff reserves all rights with respect to the determination described in this Notice,
including the right to seek relief as to them by separate proceeding or by leave of this
Court, and takes no position at this time as to whether they are properly adjudicated
within this action.
11. Plaintiff further notes that counsel has stated that the application at issue in this action “is
from last cycle,” and Plaintiff does not by this Notice contend otherwise. The notification
duties of Sections 122.308 and 122.404 attach to the determination made, and do not
depend upon which cycle governs.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on this date a true copy of the foregoing, together with the exhibits referenced
herein, was served on counsel for the Defendants by electronic means through the case channel
and efiling system.
Respectfully Submitted,
_________________________
/s/ Halo4asin
HALO4ASIN
Plaintiff, Pro Se
Ridgeway State Bar License No. 18110
