IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RIDGEWAY
FOR THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
HALO4ASIN
Plaintiff,
v.
RIDGEWAY COUNTY SHERIFF’S
OFFICE;
ERRCORE, in his official capacity;
AZAP634, in his official capacity,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. RSC-CV-5191
MOTION
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH DISCOVERY ORDERS
AND OUTSTANDING DISCOVERY REQUESTS
COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Halo4asin, pro se, and moves to compel the Defendants’
compliance with the Court’s discovery orders and with Plaintiff’s outstanding discovery requests,
pursuant to Rid. R. Civ. P. 26.3. Plaintiff has conferred with counsel as required by Rid R. Civ. P.
26.3(1)(1), and has raised each item below on the record on more than one occasion. In support,
Plaintiff states:
I. THE OUTSTANDING OBLIGATIONS
1. NAMES FOR DEPOSITIONS. On July 26, 2026, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to
depose the persons identified in discovery and directed the Defendants to produce the
names of the persons involved. On August 2, 2026, the Court repeated that direction,
stating the Defendants were to produce the “factors used to evaluate plaintiffs account
and a list of names involved so depositions can happen.” No list of names has been
produced.
2. NOTICE UNDER 9 R. STAT. SECTION 122.208(b). On August 6, 2026, the Court
directed the Defendants to “provide the plaintiff notice of what you’re contending is
classified,” and to “just list what the document pertains to.” No such notice has been
provided, in either the specific or the generic category form the statute permits.
3. INTERROGATORY RESPONSES. Plaintiff served thirteen interrogatories on August 5,
2026 pursuant to Rid. R. Civ. P. 21. No responses and no objections have been served.
II. THE PROCEDURAL HISTORY OF THE DELAY
4. On August 8, 2026, Plaintiff moved to extend the discovery deadline as to depositions
only, because names had not been produced. The motion was accepted by the Clerk on
August 9, 2026 at 1:44 AM, commencing a forty eight hour opposition period under Rid.
R. Civ. P. 7.1(4).
5. No opposition was filed. On August 10, 2026 at 1:46 AM, the Clerk recorded that
opposition was deemed waived under Rid. R. Civ. P. 7.1(9) and that the motion stands
submitted for decision under Rid. R. Civ. P. 7.1(10). That motion remains pending.
6. On August 9, 2026, counsel requested four additional days. On August 14, 2026, counsel
requested an extension until Friday, August 14, 2026 at 1:00 PM, which the Court
granted.
7. That extended date has now passed. Nothing has been filed or served.
III. RELIEF REQUESTED
8. Plaintiff requests that the Court direct the Defendants to produce, within a date certain set
by the Court, (i) the list of names previously ordered on July 26 and August 2, 2026; (ii)
responses or objections to Plaintiff’s interrogatories served August 5, 2026; and (iii) the
notice required by 9 R. Stat. Section 122.208(b).
9. Plaintiff further requests that the Court rule on Plaintiff’s pending Motion to Extend the
Discovery Deadline as to Depositions, which has stood unopposed and ripe since August
10, 2026.
10. As to the classified designation, Plaintiff requests that, absent the notice required by
Section 122.208(b) within the time the Court sets, the designation be deemed insufficient
to withhold responses. Section 122.208(b) conditions the procedure on notice being given
“[b]efore any hearing is conducted,” and Section 122.208(a) requires the Court to “issue
a determination in writing for each item of classified information.” Neither is possible
where no item has been identified. Plaintiff does not ask the Court to order disclosure of
anything it determines to be sensitive, and repeats his offer to accept production under
seal, in camera review, or a summary under Section 122.208(c).
11. Plaintiff seeks no sanction at this time and asks only that the Defendants be directed to
comply. Plaintiff has accommodated counsel’s schedule without objection throughout,
has not opposed any extension requested, and raises this only because the extended date
counsel himself proposed has passed without any filing.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court grant this Motion and set a date
certain for the Defendants’ compliance.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on this date a true copy of the foregoing was served on counsel for the Defendants
by electronic means through the case channel and efiling system.
Respectfully Submitted,
_________________________
/s/ Halo4asin
HALO4ASIN
Plaintiff, Pro Se
Ridgeway State Bar License No. 18110
