All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-08-12 (UTC+0:00)
THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
RIDGEWAY SUPERIOR COURT
THR33SIX8, an individual
Petitioner,
-against-
VULMONY, in his official capacity as a Patrol
Officer of the Palmer Police Department
pursuant to 7 R. Stat. § 133.002.
Respondent.
RSC-CV-2851
PETITIONER'S MEMORANDUM OF
LAW TO SUPPORT HABEAS CORPUS
REMEDY
Presiding Judge: Hon. EffortlessBrit
Petitioner files this short, plain memorandum of law in order to support the remedy
sought after in the petition for habeas corpus.
MEMORANDUM BODY
1. The petition does meet the standard set in In re ZachCasisbeast, Rid. Superior Ct.
RSC-CV-367 (2022).
In the eyes of the presiding judge in In re ZachCasisbeast, Hon. frostbleed wrote in his
analysis:
"In assessing petitions for writs of habeas corpus concerning arrests, the
first question to be asked is whether the police were legally entitled to make that
arrest — that is, the police either had a judicial warrant ordering an arrest, or the
police had probable cause that a crime was committed. If the arrest was not lawful
to begin with, the inquiry ends there; the record must be removed. If not, the next
and final question is whether the petitioner was actually innocent of the charge or
charges for which they were arrested."
All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-08-12 (UTC+0:00)
He wrote further that the burden of proof was "such that a reasonable and
well-informed jury could not convict the petitioner in a hypothetical trial if they were
aware of those facts, and those facts were admissible evidence." In re ZachCasisbeast,
Rid Superior Ct. RSC-CV-367 (2022).
And I need not say that there is no geniune dispute of material facts because I
have already supplemented the petition with evidence of not only my apprehension, but
what led up to it. See generally Petition, Bates No. BATES-20260716-5733975284; see
also Memorandum Decision and Order in AM General LLC v. Activision Blizzard, Inc.,
No. 1:17-cv-08644-GBD-JLC (SDNY 2020) (restated the "no geniune dispute of material
facts" standard for summary judgment). So, I have proven the facts.
Now, the analysis. Remember, if the arrest is legal—which it was because of the
murder and felony evasion charges—then "the next and final question is whether the
petitioner was actually innocent of the charge or charges for which they were
arrested." Order and Judgment in ZachCasisbeast (emphasis added).
Simply put, Respondent had no facts or evidence suggesting that I was possessing
government-issued equipment, which means that the charge for the felony of Unlawful
Possession of Goverment-Issued Equipment, R.C.C. § 2.26. Did my Para 17 have a
flashlight? No: the video shows that it did not have a flashlight. Did I have boxes of
police-issued ammunition? No: the video shows Respondent seizing all my ammunition,
which, as the notifications show, were not police-issued boxes of 9mm. Was I carrying
anything that was government-issued? No: video evidence only shows that I had a Para
17, a lockpick, and a knife.
All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-08-12 (UTC+0:00)
CONCLUSION
It would border on the defintion of frivolosity for Respondent's counsel to defend
Respondent's arrest because the facts cannot save Respondent's stance. Cf. Neitzke v. Williams,
490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989) ("[In Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967)], we stated that
an appeal on a matter of law is frivolous where '[none] of the legal points [are] arguable on their
merits.'"); see also Livingston v. Adirondack Beverage Company, No. 1091 (2d. Cir., 1998) ("An1
action is 'frivolous' when either: (1) 'the factual contentions are clearly baseless, such as when
allegations are the product of delusion or fantasy; or (2) the claim is based on an indisputably
meritless legal theory.'") (internal citations omitted).
I have not and could not have committed of the felony of Unlawful Possession of
Government-Issued Equipment, and I have factually pled and then proven such. So, the court
should grant the remedy asked in the petition.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ thr33six8
Petitioner of the above-titled action
Timezone UTC–5:00;
Licensed Attorney in the State of Ridgeway
since July 23rd, 2026 (R.S.B. License
#19302).
1 I do not have access to Federal Reporter, so I have ommitted the Reporter citation.
