Rendered from the court's authenticated repository
Searchable full text
1,622 characters extracted
—
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RIDGEWAY
FOR THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
HALO4ASIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
RIDGEWAY PARKS SERVICE,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. RSC-CV-0750
[PROPOSED] ORDER
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL
SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNT I
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Count I. Upon
consideration of the Motion, the exhibits of record, the Defendant’s Answer and declarations,
and the record of this action, the Court finds that Count I presents a question of law upon which
no material fact is in dispute, and that Plaintiff is entitled to judgment. It is hereby ORDERED:
1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Count I is GRANTED.
2. The Court DECLARES that an activity warning issued for failure to submit a weekly
activity log is not a circumstance within 4 R. Stat. § 122.402(f), and that the Defendant’s
denial of Plaintiff’s application on that basis was contrary to 4 R. Stat. § 122.402 and
impeded rights secured to Plaintiff by statute within the meaning of 7 R. Stat. § 122.101.
3. The Defendant is DIRECTED to vacate the “Failed” Final Screening result and Outcome
recorded for Plaintiff (Application Tracker, Ranger Class 22, Entry No. 26), and to
reevaluate Plaintiff’s application on the corrected record in conformity with 4 R. Stat. §
122.402 and 122.404, within seven (7) days of this Order.
4. Count II and the question of monetary relief are RESERVED for further proceedings.
DATED this ____ day of August, 2026.
1
SO ORDERED,
_________________________
Hon. EffortlessBrit
Superior Court Judge
Ridgeway Superior Court
2
