IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
Icecoldwateryes
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
DOCKET NO. RSC-CV-8006
Plaintiff
v.
WGT05
Defendant
INITIAL RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT
Defendant WGT05, appearing pro se, respectfully submits to the Court the necessary response in the matter
Icecoldwateryes v. WGT05, RSC-CV-8006:
RESPONSE TO FACTS SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFF
1. Defendant affirms that on July 24th, 2026, Plaintiff resided within the State of Ridgeway. (Pl.’s
Statement of Material Facts ¶ 1.)
2. Defendant affirms that “Plaintiff was put under arrest by RSP Cpl. WGT05 [Defendant], who is a
Senior Operator within RSP’s SWAT division, a tactical team made by 9 R. Stat. § 223.404(a),
and WGT05 [Defendant] took the Plaintiff to the warrant garage at RCSO sub.” (Pl.’s Statement
of Material Facts ¶ 2.)
3. Defendant denies that “ When WGT05 [Defendant] put Plaintiff under arrest, [Defendant] had
not seen [Plaintiff] commit a crime. The corporal also knew that Plaintiff was doing nothing in
particular upon the arrest.”(Pl. 's Statement of Material Facts ¶ 3.)
4. Defendant affirms that, “Aditionally, Plaintiff had neither a search warrant nor an arrest warrant
out for him” at the time of the aforementioned arrest. (Pl. 's Statement of Material Facts ¶ 4.)
5. Defendant affirms that, “Plaintiff was put in the back of a State Police Executor, which WGT05
spawned on the law enforcement vehicle spawning pad.” (Pl. 's Statement of Material Facts ¶ 5.)
6. Defendant lacks knowledge as to the motive of thr33six8, “thr33six8, who was looking for
d_arkshadws, was in front of RCSO sub and saw the Executor,” and subsequently denies. (Pl. 's
Statement of Material Facts ¶ 6.)
7. Defendant denies the allegation that, “While the plaintiff was in the Executor, there was another,
handcuffed individual inside the Executor.” (Pl. 's Statement of Material Facts ¶ 7.)
8. Plaintiff affirms that, “According to department policy, the State Police Executor is authorized
for use by SWAT, warrant execution purposes, and whoever individually designated by RSP's
central command, which contains troopers who are or have a rank greater than Major. RSP Pol.
601-2.1(L)(a–b); unauthorized usage can result in light punishment. RSP. Off. § 3.03(a).” (Pl. 's
Statement of Material Facts ¶ 8.)
9. Defendant affirms that, “Executors from all departments, alongside the Percivel Governance, a
bulletproof limo, are often used by RSP, RCSO, and PPD for mobilizing their tactical teams,
storing and destroying contraband obtained from executing a search warrant, and other, abnormal
cases where extra armor is needed to execute duties. “ (Pl. 's Statement of Material Facts ¶ 9.)
10. Defendant affirms Plaintiff’s Statement of Material Facts ¶ 10-22.
DEFENSE CLAIMS
11. Defendant asserts that on the 24th of July, 2026, Defendant was lawfully conducting his duties as
a full-time trooper of the Ridgeway State Police as prescribed by 9 R. Stat. § 223.005. Defendant
was on-duty, lawfully executing his authority as prescribed by 9 R. Stat. § 223.003(a)-(f), in
conjunction with duties prescribed to troopers of the Ridgeway State Police (9 R. Stat. §
223.004(a)-(j)). Defendant was patrolling with another trooper of the Ridgeway State Police,
Sergeant TheVillageLion.
12. At 2:35 PM PDT, Defendant observed Plaintiff Icecoldwateryes tase and shoot Sergeant
TheVillageLion while he was immobilized outside of the Ridgeway County Sheriff’s Office
Sub-station. See attachment.
13. Defendant asserts that based on his own observations, Defendant reasonably believed multiple
felonies had been committed by Plaintiff Icecoldwateryes. “A law enforcement officer may arrest
a person without a warrant when… [a] felony has been committed and he reasonably believes
that the person committed it.” (6 R. Stat. §131.006(b)).
14. Defendant asserts that he observed Plaintiff leave-to-avoid-arrest shortly after his detainment at
the Ridgeway County Sheriff’s Office Sub-station. See attachment.
15. Defendant reasserts that no other individual was detained inside of the RSP SWAT Executor at
the Ridgeway County Sheriff’s Office Sub-station as alleged by Plaintiff. (Pl. 's Statement of
Material Facts ¶ 7.) See above linked attachment.
REQUESTED RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests that the Court:
1. Dismiss this matter without prejudice;
2. Deny the Plaintiff all requested relief;
3. Award the Defendant costs and and applicable attorney’s fees as deemed fit;
4. Grant such other relief as the Court finds just and proper.
Respectfully Submitted,
Defendant WGT05
/s/ WGT05
WGT05, RBN#18124
