All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-08-08 (UTC+0:00)
THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
RIDGEWAY SUPERIOR COURT
RAWEQUALS, an individual
Plaintiff,
-against-
CEPHALGPT, in his official capacity as the
director of the Law Enforcement Training
Center pursuant to 7 R. Stat. § 121.404
Defendant.
RSC-CV-1389
PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO ORDER
TO SHOW CAUSE
Presiding Judge: Hon. xXBoomBlast339Xx
Plaintiff's attorney files this interim response to this court's order to show cause as to why
"[he] should not be prohibited from further representing [Plaintiff] in this matter due to the
apparent suspension of their license to practice law". For the record, I have only noticed that my
license was suspended since 2026-08-05.
BODY OF RESPONSE
1. Dir. CharlesLXV, who has suspended my license, has refused to follow the
administrative, procedural standard and the statutory standard to suspend my
license.
The Ridgeway State Bar ("R.S.B.") has the statutory power to discipline other attorneys
by (1) only raising "disciplinary hearings" to the Supreme Court of the State of Ridgeway, 3 R.
Stat. § 151.003 and (2) only for violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct or the law. Id., at
§ 151.205 ("A member of the bar may only be disciplined before the Supreme Court when found
to be in violation of the state rules of professional conduct, or when found to be in violation of a
state statute.").
I have been in hot water with the R.S.B. before, so I know how disciplinary proceedings
are meant to go. Take my first ever disciplinary proceeding. There, I was brought into a Discord
channel opened by the associate director tobyrulles4568 and was simply told that I was under
investigation by the Ethics Committee for "...allegations of participat[ing] in criminal activity,
including [my] reported arrest for murder and attempted murder." He cited Rules of Prof.
Conduct R. 8.3(c) (it is professional misconduct for an attorney to "engage in conduct involving
dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or reckless or intentional misrepresentation"), and showed the evidence
to me, which came from the three complaints made.
That is what the R.S.B. did: notify the to-be disciplined of the proceeding and its nature,
show evidence and reasoning, let the disciplined have their say, and share the outcome with the
disciplined. This is legit the worldwide standard for any adversarial proceeding, whether it's from
a prosecutor to the accused in court or from a human resources staffer to a co-worker.
All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-08-08 (UTC+0:00)
While I can analyze this under a Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment lens,
that is best written in a memorandum of law, and I feel like it would be overkill to do so here.
2. There is no urgent need to rule on my status as the plaintiff's attorney of record, so
to act on this issue sua sponte is inappropriate.
While I am the attorney of the plaintiff, upon which the burden of proof is put, I have
very weak evidence as to the urgency or severity of my suspension. This is because, as said
before, I have not been told by the R.S.B. about the suspension or what I have done. Also keep in
mind that my timezone is UTC–5:00. Please see all the material I have relied on for this
response:
# PREVIEW + URL DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
1. A screenshot of direct messages between me and Dir.
CharlesLXV (if you can even say "between" in this case). Note
how he never responds.
2. A screenshot of me noticing that I was suspended and a
subsequent video. This screenshot was taken in a private Discord
server. See Ex. 4 for the URL to the video.
3. A screenshot of direct messages between me and Attorney
General AdamStratton.
4. A message (not a screenshot thereof) containing the same video
that I shared at Ex. 2.
Media link to video:
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/970142671144361994/15
34708670137368836/you_f_ed_up.mp4?ex=6a786814&is=6a771
694&hm=82ae884b1b85e67bee2610f05eb9c6ab2738c6f9526db8
0032de73eee460fff1
All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-08-08 (UTC+0:00)
If you have ever played Deltarune, then you would understand the
video better.
5. The Ridgeway State Bar database, which includes the license
roster.
6. See the record for
the video.
A video of my first disciplinary proceeding.
I say that there is no evidence to form a belief as to the severity of the suspension. If you
can reason that because I was suspended without notice, then it was urgent, then you would be
wrong because there's more evidence supporting the belief that an arbitrary (here, it means
without notice and without the formal, statutory disciplinary procedure) disciplinary proceeding
only happens when the attorney has been banned from Ridgeway for egregious acts.
For example, vincefant, the Canadian who was chased out over ro-state beef on
www.roblox.com. I will call this story "2G2D" (2 governors, 2 doxxes). Now, I don't need to
swear that everyone in Ridgemade/Ridgeway and Clark County knows what vincefant, who was
the governor of the State of Ridgemade, did to Clark County in 2025, and I also need not swear
about what Clark County Governor orangebear22 and his goons (mandatorymorale and his IIA
henchmen) did in return. I have never seen a case of international NEET-ification hit a human
this badly. Legit over a war between two Roblox communities. Beef was as petty as the Super
Smash Bros. tournament over IHOP versus Denny's. But it is important to remember that both of
these guys, with the encouragement and help of their respective goons, doxxed each other.
And people say that ro-mobs are worse. Wait until they hear that story.
As I brought him up as an example, he was disbarred for his blacklist from Ridgeway as a
whole following 2G2D. Toby said that robbing an ATM in-game is a crime of dishonesty, but
this? Obviously a crime of not only dishonesty, but moral turpidtude. Something as egregious as
doxxing would require quick action because if it's on the internet, it will stay on the internet
unless you act fast enough to get it removed before someone archives it.
So, the belief that there is an urgent need for my suspension is unproven and unfounded,
and the evidence shows that no-notice disciplinary proceedings only happen in extreme cases,
like doxxing.
CONCLUSION
This court should let me represent regardless of the suspension because (1) it is abnormal
and arbitrary and (2) there is no urgency for the presiding judge to act on this issue sua sponte.
———————————————
All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-08-08 (UTC+0:00)
/s/ thr33six8
The Attorney of Plaintiff/Client rawequals;
Licensed Attorney in the State of Ridgeway
since July 23rd, 2026 (R.S.B. License
#19302).
