IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RIDGEWAY
FOR THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
HALO4ASIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
RIDGEWAY COUNTY SHERIFF’S
OFFICE,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. RSC-CV-5191
DISCOVERY
PLAINTIFF’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANTS
Pursuant to Rid. R. Civ. P. 21, Plaintiff serves the following interrogatories. Defendants shall
answer each separately and fully in writing under oath, by an officer or agent furnishing the
information available to the party, including information within the knowledge of Defendants’
agents, employees, and attorneys, and information Defendants have the practical ability to
obtain. Rid. R. Civ. P. 21(2)(1).
1. Identify the Google Sheet referenced in the Background Investigation Transcription dated
August 3, 2026, including its title, location, custodian, date of creation, and the persons
with access to it.
2. State whether that Sheet, in the form in which it existed on May 25, 2026, still exists.
3. If it does not exist in that form, state the date on which it was deleted, altered, or
overwritten; the username of each person who did so; and the reason.
4. Identify each person who has edited, added to, or removed content from that Sheet since
May 19, 2026, and state the date of each edit.
5. Identify each person who participated in the screening of Plaintiff’s application, and state
the role each performed.
1
6. State whether Lt. Azap634 authored the entry reading “one of the worst badge graphs ive
seen; fail second op; 3235(a),” and if he did not, identify the person who did.
7. State each factor deemed indicative of Plaintiff being an alternate account, and for each,
the specific evidence relied upon.
8. Identify the two factors referenced by Lt. Azap634 in stating that “all but about two
factors were deemed indicative.”
9. Identify the source of the image described in the moderation history note of the
Transcription, state the channel or location in which it was originally posted, identify the
person who obtained it, and state the date obtained.
10. State whether the prior account termination records submitted by Plaintiff were reviewed
during the investigation, and if so, identify each person who reviewed them.
11. State the basis on which the investigation found Plaintiff’s account age “acceptable” at
7,131 days while concluding that Plaintiff was likely an alternate account.
12. Identify each communication among Lt. Azap634, Capt. errcore, and Det.
AMAZINGUYCOOL123 concerning Plaintiff or Plaintiff’s application between May 19
and May 29, 2026, stating the date, participants, and platform of each.
13. NOTICE AS TO RULE 21(4): Should Defendants invoke the option to produce records
in answer to any interrogatory, Plaintiff notes that where the records are not within the
interrogating party’s practical ability to reach, the responding party shall produce the
records themselves.
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on this date a true copy of these Interrogatories was served on counsel for the
Defendants by electronic means through the case channel and e-filing system.
Respectfully Submitted,
_________________________
/s/ Halo4asin
HALO4ASIN
Plaintiff, Pro Se
Ridgeway State Bar License No. 18110
3
