All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-08-04 (UTC+0:00)
THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
RIDGEWAY SUPERIOR COURT
MASTERQV, an individual; TRIPIAFER23, an
individual
Plaintiff,
-against-
WGT05, an individual in his official capacity
as a corporal of the Ridgeway State Police;
and SMASHCANS, an individual in his official
capacity as a magistrate judge of the Superior
Court of the State of Ridgeway
Defendants.
RSC-CV-1141
CIVIL COMPLAINT
Presiding Judge: Magistrate Hon.
vonhagen123
Plaintiffs, proceeding with their attorney, who is thr33six8 Esq., hereby file this
complaint to commence the above-titled civil action.
PARTIES
1. Defendant WGT05 is a resident of the State of Ridgeway. His timezone is UTC–4:00. He
is a corporal of the Ridgeway State Police ("RSP"), which is an "agency of the state"
pursuant to 9 R. Stat. § 223.001. He has also had his peace officer certification, which
allows him to execute such duties, Id., at § 222.101, since 2022-04-23. Finally, he is an
attorney of the State of Ridgeway, having license #18124, and, most notably, scored a 92
on the USBE.
2. Defendant smashcans is a resident of the State of Ridgeway. His timezone is UTC–5:00.
He is the RSP major, and he has held his LETC peace officer certification since
2021-02-27. Finally, he is an attorney of the State of Ridgeway, having license #18144
since 2026-03-26.
3. Plaintiffs are residents of the State of Ridgeway.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. This court, which is the Superior Court of the State of Ridgeway, shall "shall exercise
original jurisdiction for all civil and criminal cases or controversies under the rules as set
by the Supreme Court", R. Const. art. Ⅴ, § Ⅳ, and it shall have original jurisdiction over,
among other things, "any controversy not otherwise falling within the jurisdiction of the
Supreme Court, Administrative Court, or Magistrate Court as set forth by law". See
generally The Judiciary Act of 2026 § 302, S.B. 002, 11th Sen. (2026); 3 R. Stat. §
131.104(a–e). As the controversy is actionable here, jurisidiction is proper.
2. This court is the proper venue because civil actions shall only take place in the county
where the controversy occurs. See 7 R. Stat. §§ 131.001–131.003. Since this takes place
within the County of Ridgeway, a county of the State of Ridgeway pursuant to 9 R. Stat.
§ 321.001, venue is proper.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
1. On 2026-05-18, smashcans filed his notice of appearnce in State of Ridgeway v.
1aresthegod, Rid. Superior Ct. RSC-CM-1464 (2026).
2. Before smashcans would be sworn in as a magistrate judge, he was a public defender who
often represented defendants in probable cause hearings and other, similar, and criminal
matters.
3. On 2026-06-14, smashcans was sworn in as a magistrate judge by Associate Justice
Techiey.
4. On 2026-08-01, Defendant and Magistrate Hon. smashcans issued the search warrant
numbered RSC-SW-6740, which was directed to the Ridgeway State Police and "any
peace officer assisting".
5. The search warrant read: "Proof by affidavit having been made before this Court, and the
Court finding probable cause ot believe that evidence of the offense of R.C.C. [§] 2.29 -
Unlawful Possession of a Firearm (Defendant was in possession of a Solami) used in the
commission of a murder at Sterling Hub) will be found in or upon the place or person
described below, YOU ARE COMMANDED to search:"
6. Under the "PLACE AND/OR PERSON TO BE SEARCHED" header, it read: "Premises:
all vehicles and his residence" and "Person: masterqv".
7. Under the "AND TO SEIZE the following property or things", it read: "Solami's [sic],
any other illegal contraband".
8. Under the "CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS" header, it read: "WANTED PERSON!
PLEASE SEARCH ALL PERSONAL VEHICLES AND RESIDENCE SAFE FOR ALL
ILLE[GAL] FIREARMS AND AMMUNITION. ALSO TAKE ANY AND ALL
ILLEGAL ITEMS FOUND WITHIN THIS SEARCH…"
9. The search warrant also read, "the affidavit in support of this warrant remains SEALED
by order of the Court", and it is signed by smashcans.
10. On 2026-08-01, Plaintiff was in the State of Ridgeway, he was put under arrest, and he
was taken to the RCSO HQ's warrant garage.
11. The only RSP troopers on duty were RSP Sgt. drcharles0, RSP Snr. Tpr. jyyvznn,
Trooper Rar3Bitcoin, RSP Mjr. smashcans, RSP Snr. Tpr. startrooper2345, and RSP Sgt.
TheVillageLion.
12. At all times, only jyyvznn, RCSO CID Deputy First Class/Detective Amazinguycool123,
who was wearing the RCSO SRT BDU, Defendant smashcans, and Plaintiff masterqv
were in the warrant garage.
13. At 20:47 (UTC+0:00), Plaintiff masterqv was moved by jyyvznn and put into the back of
a Percivel Governance spawned by smashcans; the license plate of the Percivel
Governance was 5670, which is Defendant smashcans' license plate number.
14. jyyvznn would go on to execute the search warrant.
15. At 20:51, Defendant smashcans said to Plaintiff, "I should just make u a fugative [sic]"
following a verbal challenge from the Plaintiff. Defendant then said "I think I might
[make you a fugitive]".
16. At 20:51, Defendant radioed in, "whos prmy for this sw", then he said "can you come
book him when you have a moment".
17. On 2026-08-01, Plaintiff masterqv was booked by RSP Snr. Tpr. jyyvznn for R.C.C. §§
2.29 (Unlawful Possession of a Firearm), 4.08 (Possession of Burglary Tools), 4.03 (Bank
Robbery). The description read: "Outside city limits; individual was in possession of a
Solami, Stetson M1, .45 ACP Ammo, multiple lockpicsk, x1 RCu duffel bag - all
confiscated as a result of a search warrant issued by smashcans."
18. The Ridgeway State Police videos all of its executions of search warrants, and the
Ridgeway State Police has the video of executing masterqv's search warrant as pled at
Compl. Statement of Facts 7.
19. On 2026-08-02, Defendant and RSP Cpl. WGT05 filed a document ("return"), which was
titled "RETURN AND INVENTORY OF SEARCH WARRANT" with the Superior
Court of the State of Ridgeway for Plaintiff's search warrant.
20. Under the "INVENTORY OF PROPERTY TAKEN" header, it read the following were
"taken":
a. Six (6) 30 rd. boxes of 5.56 ammunition,
b. Two (2) 2 Stetson M1s,
c. One (1) Solami,
d. Two (2) 30 rd. boxes of .45 ACP ammunition,
e. Four (4) lockpicks, and;
f. One (1) RCU Duffel Bag.
21. It also read in parantheses: "Warrant was leaked by rcso prior to apprehension resulting in
partial/full stash removal/transfer prior to execution".
22. Under the "RECEIPT" header, it read: "I declare that a copy of this warrant and a receipt
for the property taken was left with the person from whom (or from whose premises) the
property was tkaen, or at the place where the property was found. I declare under penalty
of perjury under the laws of State of Ridgeway that the foregoing return and inventory
are true and correct."
23. The return was signed by WGT05, and the return read that the search warrant was
executed on 2026-08-02. It also read that the return itself was filed on the same day.
24. At some time, Defendant smashcans issued a search warrant for Plaintiff Tripiafer23. A
part of the search warrant read: "WANTED PERSON! ILLEGAL FIREARMS AND
POLICE GRADE EQUIPMENT, SEARCH PERSON AND ALL VEHICLES.
ADDITIONALLY, TAKE ANY AND ALL ILLEGAL ITEMS."
25. On 2026-08-02, Plaintiff masterqv was booked by RSP Sgt. mp5sopmods for R.C.C. §
2.29 (Unlawful Possession of a Firearm). The arrest record read: "RCSO Sub; Suspect
was found in possession of a Solami machine gun; Sterling".
26. On 2026-08-02T08:37:00-UTC+8:00, Plaintiff Tripiafer23 was put under arrest, and he
was in the RCSO HQ's warrant garage.
27. Plaintiff Tripiafer23 began streaming the execution of his search warrant in a Discord
voice channel.
28. thr33six8, MurkenDawg, and others watched the stream.
29. Inside of the warrant garage was Defendant and RSP Cpl. WGT05, Defendant and RSP
Mjr. smashcans, RSP Sgt. mp5sopmods, RSP Sgt. drcharles0, RNG 127th Combat
Support Brigade Lt. Col. lmBigPoe, who is also a RCSO sergeant, RCSO SRT Lt.
nisicult, RCSO CID Cpl./Det. rainqg, who was wearing the RCSO SRT BDU and gear,
and RNG 146th MPI Battalion Cpl. AngellicTerror, who is also a licensed attorney.
30. At 08:37, Defendant WGT05 searched Plaintiff's purple Gridlock, and said "BURN".
31. WGT05 did not disclose what he found in the van before saying so.
32. nisicult, who does not have a burn permit, and lmBigPoe, who does indeed have a burn
permit, opened fire and burned Plaintiff's vehicle.
33. Further burns would follow.
34. Defendant smashcans announced the burns of these vehicles.
35. All of the burns took place inside of the warrant garage.
36. Outside, Proceed101 and nahhimdiff watched the execution of Plaintiff Tripiafer23's
search warrant.
37. At 08:42, lmBigPoe said to WGT05, "wgt you gotta send me the receipt after".
38. Plaintiff said, "WGT I want the search warrant receipt and the search warrant itself".
39. WGT05 said nothing despite being aware of his statutory duty to do so: he has been sued
for failing to do so. See, e.g., r_zuelius v. WGT05, Rid. Superior Ct. (RSC-CV-1716)
(2026); Icecoldwateryes v. WGT05, Rid. Superior Ct. (RSC-CV-8006) (2026).
TORTS
#1: Official Misconduct (7 R. Stat. § 121.404)
Tortfeasor: Defendant WGT05
1. Plaintiff incorporates all pled facts and all pled averments.
2. Defendant was a public servant, as he was a corporal of the Ridgeway State Police, which
is an "agency of the state" pursuant to 9 R. Stat. § 223.001. Compl. Parties ¶ 1.
3. Defendant did commit an unauthorized act of his office/authority, as he did not give
Plaintiff Tripiafer23 a copy of his search warrant pursuant to 6 R. Stat. § 131.014.
4. Therefore, there is a cause of action for the tort of Official Misconduct, of which
Defendant WGT05 is the tortfeasor.
#2: Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law (7 R. Stat. § 121.403)
Tortfeasor: Defendant WGT05
1. Plaintiff incorporates all pled facts and all pled averments.
2. Since Defendant was a public servant, he was acting under the statutory authories of the
Ridgeway State Police and peace officers. See, e.g., 9 R. Stat. § 223.003 (statute defining
the authorities of the Ridgeway State Police).
3. Defendant did deprieve Plaintiff of his statutory right to be given a copy of his executed
search warrant, which the Plaintiff has pursuant to 6 R. Stat. § 131.014.
4. Therefore, there is a cause of action for the tort of Deprivation of Rights under Color of
Law, of which Defendant WGT05 is the tortfeasor.
#3: Official Misconduct (7 R. Stat. § 121.404)
Tortfeasor: Defendant smashcans in his official capacity as a magistrate judge
1. Plaintiff incorporates all pled facts and all pled averments.
2. Defendant was a public servant, as he was a magistrate judge of the Superior Court of the
State of Ridgeway.
3. Defendant did refrain from recusing himself from the search warrants that were directed
to the Ridgeway State Police on Plaintiff masterqv. Defendant had to recuse because (1)
he is an RSP major, and (2) he had a clear, private (i.e., only to his and RSP's benefit)
interest in accepting the search warrant. See, e.g., Ridgway Code of Judicial Conduct
2(B) ("A judge shall not lend the prestige of judicial office to advance the private
interests of the judge or others") (emphasis added). See also Id., at 2(A) ("A judge shall
respect and comply with the law and shall act at all times in a manner that promotes
public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.") (emphasis
added).
4. Since Defendant was not impartial, he had to recuse from signing the warrant under the
Fourth Amendment. See Chartie v. United States, 609 U.S. __ (2026) (slip op., at 4)
("When law enforcement officials undertake a search to discover evidence of a crime, the
reasonableness standard [of the Fourth Amendment] generally requires that they seek a
warrant from 'a neutral and detached magistrate…'") (emphasis added) (quoting Johnson
v. United States, 333 U. S. 10, 14 (1948)).
5. Because Defendant did not recuse himself, Defendant issued the search warrant, and
Plaintiff consequently lost some of his property that would have not been seized if it
weren't for the search warrant.
6. Defendant also does not have judicial immunity for this tort. Cf. Pulliam v. Allen, 466
U.S. 522 (1984) (judicial immunity does not bar injunctive relief).
7. Therefore, there is a cause of action for the tort of Official Misconduct, of which
Defendant smashcans, who is liable in his official capacity as a magistrate judge of the
Superior Court of the State of Ridgeway, is the tortfeasor.
#4: Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law (7 R. Stat. § 121.403)
Tortfeasor: Defendant smashcans in his official capacity as a magistrate judge
1. Plaintiff incorporates all pled facts and all pled averments.
2. Defendant was acting under statute when he heard and signed the search warrant and its
matters pursuant to 6 R. Stat. § 131.013 ("an authorized judge, upon review of the
application, affidavits, and evidence submitted, if satisfied that probable cause exists for
the issuing of the search warrant, shall issue a search warrant signed by him…").
3. By not recusing from the search warrant for the aforementioned reasons, Defendant
smashcans violated the aforementioned Johnson principle and therefore Plaintiff
masterqv's Fourth Amendment rights.
4. Therefore, there is a cause of action for the tort of Deprivation of Rights under Color of
Law, of which Defendant smashcans, who is liable in his official capacity as a magistrate
judge of the Superior Court of the State of Ridgeway, is the tortfeasor.
RELIEF
Pursuant to Rid. Rule Civ. Proc. 8(1), Plaintiff includes the following statements entitling himself
to relief for the claims of this civil action.
1. For the 1st tort of Official Misconduct, Plaintiff deems himself entitled to $10,000 in
punitive damages from Defendant WGT05, who is the tortfeasor of this tort. 7 R. Stat. §
121.404 ("Any individual who [commits this tort]...shall be liable for…punitive damages
of up to $10,000.00]"). He also deems himself entitled to an injunction enjoining
defendant to reinstate Plaintiff's peace officer certification. Id. ("Any individual who
[commits this tort]...shall be liable for…injunctive reliefs restraining the individual from
performing a certain action, or orders instructing the individual to perform a certain
action").
2. For the 1st count of the tort of Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law, Plaintiff deems
himself entitled to $1,000 in punitive damages from Defendant WGT05, who is the
tortfeasor of this tort. 7 R. Stat. § 121.403 ("Every person who [commits this tort]...shall
be liable to the party injured in an action of law, suit in equity, or any other proceeding
for redress") (emphasis added).
3. For the 2nd tort of Official Misconduct, Plaintiff deems himself entitled to $10,000 in
punitive damages from Defendant smashcans, who is the tortfeasor of this tort. 7 R. Stat.
§ 121.404.
4. For the 2nd count of the tort of Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law, Plaintiff deems
himself entitled to an injunction enjoining Defendant from hearing any search warrant
matters or signing any search warrant brought/applied by a RSP Trooper. 7 R. Stat. §
121.403
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ masterqv
Plaintiff of the above-titled civil action
/s/ Tripiafer23
Plaintiff of the above-titled civil action;
Timezone UTC+08:00.
/s/ thr33six8
Timezone UTC–5:00;
The Attorney of Plaintiffs/Clients masterqv
andTripiafer23;
Licensed Attorney in the State of Ridgeway
since July 23rd, 2026 (R.S.B. License
#19302).
THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
RIDGEWAY SUPERIOR COURT
MASTERQV, an individual; TRIPIAFER23, an
individual
Plaintiff,
-against-
WGT05, an individual in his official capacity
as a corporal of the Ridgeway State Police;
and SMASHCANS, an individual in his official
capacity as the major of the Ridgeway State
Police and in his official capacity as a
magistrate judge of the Superior Court of the
State of Ridgeway
Defendants.
RSC-CV-1141
PLAINTIFFS' DOCUMENT OF INITIAL
DISCLOSURES
Presiding Judge: Magistrate Hon.
vonhagen123
Plaintiffs hereby file this document disclosing evidence and witnesses.
EXHIBITS
# PREVIEW + URL DESCRIPTION
1. Plaintiff masterqv's arrest record for the search warrant.
2. Plaintiff Tripiafer23's arrest record for the search warrant.
3. A carbon copy of Plaintiff Tripiafter23's search warrant receipt. The
original can be found at the URL
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Us5Xw3ghCa4GRbzLcavPgI
abeI-iKUJotuJd-JplmEA.
4. A carbon copy of the return filed for Plaintiff masterqv's search
warrant. The URL for the original is
https://rwcourts.org/api/v2/warrants/cmsasyglx00gqne0xbpi1vzd6/c
ontent?doc=return.
5. A carbon copy of Plaintiff masterqv's search warrant. The URL for
the original is
https://rwcourts.org/api/v2/warrants/cmsasyglx00gqne0xbpi1vzd6/c
ontent?doc=warrant.
6. Screenshots of Plaintifff Tripiafer23's stream. Taken by thr33six8.
In no particular order.
7. A clip of the execution of Plaintiff masterqv's search warrant.
WITNESSES
WITNESS DESCRIPTION
masterqv:8506497
Eyewitness.
satchmo
(@thr33six8:157
724843)
Eyewitness. Watched Plaintiff Tripafter23's stream.
TizianoBascetti
(@Tripiafer23:126
3682765)
Eyewitness.
Proceed101:12636
82765
Eyewitness. See Compl. Statement of Facts ¶ 36.
moe
(@nahhimdiff:436
1925012)
Eyewitness. See Compl. Statement of Facts ¶ 36.
Cans
(@smashcans:1170
93679e)
Eyewitness.
WGT05:17689555
2
Eyewitness.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ masterqv
Plaintiff of the above-titled civil action
/s/ Tripiafer23
Plaintiff of the above-titled civil action;
Timezone UTC+08:00.
/s/ thr33six8
Timezone UTC–5:00;
The Attorney of Plaintiffs/Clients masterqv
andTripiafer23;
Licensed Attorney in the State of Ridgeway
since July 23rd, 2026 (R.S.B. License
#19302).
