ADM F. 200 (Rev. 03/22) Summons in a Civil Action
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
rawequals
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
DOCKET NO. RSC-CV-1389
Plaintiff
v.
CephalGPT
Defendant
SUMMONS
To also be served to the Attorney General, who is AdamStratton, and/or the solicitor generals pursuant to Rid. Rule Civ. Proc. 4(4)(4)
The plaintiff in the above-named civil action has commenced it by filing the complaint. If you are the
above-named defendant, who is being sued in their official capacity, you must appear and defend yourself.
Failure to do so can result in the clerk entering default, which begins default judgment being rendered upon the
claims in the complaint.
Because you shall file an answer pursuant to Rid. Rule Civ. Proc. 5(16), you have five (5) days to file
the aforementioned answer A copy of the complaint has been provided alongside this summons.
JUDGE / JUSTICE CLERK OF THE COURT
/s/ vonhagen123 /s/ Halo4asin
EXECUTED ON 08/03/2026 EXECUTED ON 08/03/2026
/s/ rawequals
Plaintiff of the above-titled civil action
———————————————
———————————————
/s/ thr33six8
The Attorney of Plaintiff/Client rawequals;
Licensed Attorney in the State of Ridgeway since July
23rd, 2026 (R.S.B. License #19302).
All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-08-03 (UTC+0:00)
THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
RIDGEWAY SUPERIOR COURT
RAWEQUALS, an individual
Plaintiff,
-against-
CEPHALGPT, in his official capacity as the
director of the Law Enforcement Training
Center pursuant to 7 R. Stat. § 121.404
Defendant.
RSC-CV-1389
CIVIL COMPLAINT
Presiding Judge: Hon. N/A
Plaintiff, proceeding with his attorney, who is thr33six8 Esq., hereby files this complaint
to commence the above-titled civil action.
PARTIES
1. Defendant CephalGPT is a resident of the State of Ridgeway. His timezone is UTC+1:00.
He is the director of the Law Enforcement Training Center ("LETC"), which is the
"agency of the state", 9 R. Stat. § 221.001, for certifying peace officers as well as
teaching the State's law enforcement curricula. Id. at § 221.002.
a. He has also held his peace officer certification from LETC since 2021-01-31. He
is a trooper Ridgeway State Police, employed since 2026-07-03. He is the
Lieutenant Colonel of the Ridgeway National Guard, employed since 2025-06-11.
b. He was also the Sheriff of the Ridgeway County Sheriff's Office, employed as a
deputy there since at least 2024-04-05 until his resignation on 2026-06-22.
2. Plaintiff rawequals (f/k/a/ SolomonNikos) is a resident of the State of Ridgeway.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. This court, which is the Superior Court of the State of Ridgeway, shall "shall exercise
original jurisdiction for all civil and criminal cases or controversies under the rules as set
by the Supreme Court", R. Const. art. Ⅴ, § Ⅳ, and it shall have original jurisdiction over,
among other things, "any controversy not otherwise falling within the jurisdiction of the
Supreme Court, Administrative Court, or Magistrate Court as set forth by law". See
generally The Judiciary Act of 2026 § 302, S.B. 002, 11th Sen. (2026); 3 R. Stat. §
131.104(a–e). As the controversy is actionable here, jurisidiction is proper.
2. This court is the proper venue because civil actions shall only take place in the county
where the controversy occurs. See 7 R. Stat. §§ 131.001–131.003. Since this takes place
within the County of Ridgeway, a county of the State of Ridgeway pursuant to 9 R. Stat.
§ 321.001, venue is proper.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
1. Since at 2024-03-11, Plaintiff has held his peace officer certification from LETC.
2. Plaintiff said to his inner circle that "i was cop in boulder" as well as that he was a PPD
officer, an RNG guardsman, and a senator.
3. Plaintiff has never been convicted of a crime in the State of Ridgeway.
4. LETC keeps all of its policies and all of its offenses on its Code of Conduct.
All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-08-03 (UTC+0:00)
5. The Code of Conduct applies to LETC employees as well as those who hold peace officer
certificates.
6. Outside of being convicted of a crime of "moral turpitude, fraud, or of felonious
severity", there is no offense for committing crime on the LETC's Code of Conduct
(hereinafter cited "LETC Off."); there exists no policy. See LETC Off. § 4.10 ("Criminal
Malfeasance").
7. There is no offense in the Code of Conduct for being held liable (i.e., liable of a tort).
8. On 2026-08-03, Plaintiff went onto the LETC's database and saw that his peace officer
certification was revoked.
9. On his entry in the peace officer certification roster, a note left by Defendant read:
"Repetitive criminal activity whilst possessing an active certification."
10. When Plaintiff made a ticket (#general-0084) in LETC's Discord server on 2026-08-03,
and he asked why his peace officer certification was revoked, Defendant said "it's been
revoked for extreme criminal activity whilst in possession of a LETC certification".
11. Plaintiff pointed out to Defendant LETC Off. § 4.10, and then Defendant did not reply to
him.
12. Defendant had not informed or tried Plaintiff of/for the revocation of his peace officer
certification.
13. Defendant did not share evidence of the allegation that Plaintiff has engaged in
"repetitive criminal activity" or "extreme criminal activity whilst possessing an active
certification".
14. Defendant did not have evidence to support his allegations before and when he revoked
Plaintiff's peace officer certification.
15. No internal affairs office of law enforcement agencies such as the Ridgeway State Police,
Ridgeway County Sheriff's Office, or the Palmer Police Department have had findings
related to the alleged facts behind the revocation of Plaintiff's peace officer certification
and sent them to Defendant.
16. Ridgeway's Department of Justice have neither made such a finding or published such to
Defendant before revocation.
17. On the roster, there are only 23 revoked peace officer certifications.
18. UnKnownHoooman's peace officer certification, which he had held since 2021-02-27,
was marked as revoked on the roster by Director drjack0 "[a]s a result of State v.
UnKnownHooman (11/27/2024)."
TORTS
#1: Official Misconduct (7 R. Stat. § 121.404)
1. Plaintiff incorporates all pled facts and all pled averments.
2. Defendant is a public servant because he is an employee of the Law Enforcement
Training Center, which is an "agency of the state". 9 R. Stat. § 221.001; see also Compl.
Parties ¶ 1.
3. Defendant committed an unauthorized act of his office, for he revoked Plaintiff's peace
officer certification without trying him for said offense, which is required per statute.
Compl. Statement of Facts ¶¶ 12–16; 9 R. Stat. § 222.203 ("No revocaiton of a peace
officer certification shall be issued without due process of law"). He also did not act on
findings from either any law enforcement agency's internal affairs office or the DOJ, and
he must act on only those findings because he does not have the statutory power to lead
All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-08-03 (UTC+0:00)
investigations of his own. Id., at § 222.202 ("The Law Enforcement Training Center
shall not conduct investigations into any wrongdoing or misconduct, and shall rely
upon the investigative dispositions and evidence acquired by law enforcement
agency heads, professional conduct organizations and the Justice Department.")
(emphasis added); Id., at § 222.203 ("No revocation of a peace officer certification shall
be issued without due process of law"); Id., at § 222.207 ("The Law Enforcement
Training Center shall rely upon the recommendations of law enforcement agency heads,
internal affairs organizations, and the Justice Department."); see generally Id., at §
222.208(a–c) ("The Law Enforcement Training Center shall not take any action to revoke
a certification unless an internal affairs organization or the Justice Department has [found
the following]…").
4. Therefore, there is a cause of action for the tort of Official Misconduct, of which
Defendant CephalGPT is the tortfeasor.
#2: Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law (7 R. Stat. § 121.403)
1. Plaintiff incorporates all pled facts and all pled averments.
2. Defendant was acting under statute, as he was acting as the director of the Law
Enforcement Training Center and was therefore acting under its statuatory
office/authority. See generally Compl. Statement of Facts; see, e.g., 9 R. Stat. §§
221.204–222.207 (statutes definining LETC's authority).
3. Defendant did not try Plaintiff for his allegation that Plaintiff was engaged in "repetitive
criminal activity" or "extreme criminal activity whilst in possession of a LETC
certification". See Compl. Statement of Facts ¶¶ 9–10.
4. Before the revocation, Defendant had not had any findings from any internal affairs
office or the DOJ for such allegations, Defendant does not have any evidence for such
allegations, and Defendant did not show Plaintiff any evidence for the allegations.
5. Since Defendant did not (1) try Plaintiff for the allegations, Plaintiff's statutory right to
due process of the revocation of a peace officer certification pursuant to 9 R. Stat. §
222.203 was violated.
6. Therefore, there is a cause of action for the tort of Deprivation of Rights under Color of
Law, of which Defendant CephalGPT is the tortfeasor.
#3: (2nd Count of) Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law (7 R. Stat. § 121.403)
1. Plaintiff incorporates all pled facts, all pled averments, all arguments, and all conclusions.
2. Since Defendant's allegations that Plaintiff was (1) engaged in "repetitive criminal
activity" or (2) engaged in "extreme criminal activity whilst in possession of a LETC
certification", and Defendant had no evidence to support his allegations before the
revocation, Defendant unreasonably seized Plaintiff's peace officer certification, which
violates Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment "right… to be secure in [his]...paper and effects,
against unreasonable searches and seizures".
All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-08-03 (UTC+0:00)
3. Therefore, there is another cause of action for the tort of Deprivation of Rights under
Color of Law, of which Defendant CephalGPT is the tortfeasor.
#4: (3rd Count of) Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law (7 R. Stat. § 121.403)
1. Plaintiff incorporates all pled facts, all pled averments, all arguments, and all conclusions.
2. Since Defendant (1) unreasonably seized Plaintiff's peace officer certification, and (2)
Defendant did not afford Plaintiff due process, which is guarnateed per statute, Defendant
violated Plaintiff's right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment.
3. Therefore, there is a third cause of action for the tort of Deprivation of Rights under
Color of Law, of which Defendant CephalGPT is the tortfeasor.
#5: (4th Count of) Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law (7 R. Stat. § 121.403)
1. Plaintiff incorporates all pled facts, all pled averments, all arguments, and all conclusions.
2. Since Defendant seized Plaintiff's peace officer certification without due process, which
is a protection statuatorily afforded to Plaintiff, he violated Plaintiff's constitutional right
to "be protected in the enjoyment of life, liberty, and property" (emphasis added). Rid.
Const. Art. Ⅰ, § Ⅴ.
3. Violations of any right, which includes this one, are actionable under this tort pursuant to
this tort's establishing statute.
4. Therefore, there is a fourth cause of action for the tort of Deprivation of Rights under
Color of Law, of which Defendant CephalGPT is the tortfeasor.
#6: (5th Count of) Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law (7 R. Stat. § 121.403)
1. Plaintiff incorporates all pled facts, all pled averments, all arguments, and all conclusions.
2. Since Defendant, without due process, seized/revoked Plaintiff's peace officer
certification, which is Plaintiff's property and something that Plaintiff has a protected
interest in,, he violated Plaintiff's constituional right to "hold [himself], [his] houses,
papers, and possessions, free from search or seizure". Rid. Const. Art. Ⅰ, § Ⅷ.
3. Violations of any right, which includes this one, are actionable under this tort pursuant to
this tort's establishing statute.
4. Therefore, there is a fifth cause of action for the tort of Deprivation of Rights under Color
of Law, of which Defendant CephalGPT is the tortfeasor.
RELIEF
Pursuant to Rid. Rule Civ. Proc. 8(1), Plaintiff includes the following statements entitling himself
to relief for the claims of this civil action.
1. For the tort of Official Misconduct, Plaintiff deems himself entitled to $10,000 in
punitive damages from Defendant CephalGPT, who is the tortfeasor of this tort. 7 R. Stat.
§ 121.404 ("Any individual who [commits this tort]...shall be liable for…punitive
damages of up to $10,000.00]"). He also deems himself entitled to an injunction
enjoining defendant to reinstate Plaintiff's peace officer certification. Id. ("Any individual
who [commits this tort]...shall be liable for…injunctive reliefs restraining the individual
All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-08-03 (UTC+0:00)
from performing a certain action, or orders instructing the individual to perform a certain
action").
2. For the 1st count of the tort of Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law, Plaintiff deems
himself entitled to an injunction ordering Defendant to reinstate Plaintiff's peace officer
certification. 7 R. Stat. § 121.403 ("Every person who [commits this tort]...shall be liable
to the party injured in an action of law, suit in equity, or any other proceeding for
redress") (emphasis added).
3. For the 2nd count of the tort of Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law, Plaintiff deems
himself entitled to an injunction ordering Defendant to reinstate Plaintiff's peace officer
certification. 7 R. Stat. § 121.403 ("Every person who [commits this tort]...shall be liable
to the party injured in an action of law, suit in equity, or any other proceeding for
redress") (emphasis added).
4. For the 3rd count of the tort of Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law, Plaintiff deems
himself entitled to an injunction ordering Defendant to reinstate Plaintiff's peace officer
certification. 7 R. Stat. § 121.403 ("Every person who [commits this tort]...shall be liable
to the party injured in an action of law, suit in equity, or any other proceeding for
redress") (emphasis added).
5. For the 4th count of the tort of Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law, Plaintiff deems
himself entitled to an injunction ordering Defendant to reinstate Plaintiff's peace officer
certification. 7 R. Stat. § 121.403 ("Every person who [commits this tort]...shall be liable
to the party injured in an action of law, suit in equity, or any other proceeding for
redress") (emphasis added).
6. For the 5th count of the tort of Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law, Plaintiff deems
himself entitled to an injunction ordering Defendant to reinstate Plaintiff's peace officer
certification. 7 R. Stat. § 121.403 ("Every person who [commits this tort]...shall be liable
to the party injured in an action of law, suit in equity, or any other proceeding for
redress") (emphasis added).
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ rawequals
Plaintiff of the above-titled civil action
———————————————
———————————————
/s/ thr33six8
The Attorney of Plaintiff/Client rawequals;
Licensed Attorney in the State of Ridgeway
since July 23rd, 2026 (R.S.B. License
#19302).
All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-08-03 (UTC+0:00)
THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
RIDGEWAY SUPERIOR COURT
RAWEQUALS, an individual
Plaintiff,
-against-
CEPHALGPT, in his official capacity as the
director of the Law Enforcement Training
Center pursuant to 7 R. Stat. § 121.404
Defendant.
RSC-CV-1389
PLAINTIFF'S DOCUMENT OF INITIAL
DISCLOSURES
Presiding Judge: Hon. N/A
Plaintiff hereby supplements the complaint of the above-titled civil action with this
document that discloses evidence and witnesses intended to be used by Plaintiff.
EXHIBITS
# PREVIEW + URL DESCRIPTION
1. A screenshot of #general-0086, the ticket that Plaintiff created at
Compl. Statement of Facts ¶ 10.
2. The database of the Law Enforcement Training Center, which
includes spreadsheets such as their Certification Roster.
The URL of rawequal's peace officer certification in the database is
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sJ056_Ermi7vxeHxj9Lm7
1iNakeKZSd43TmGKZqVF7Q/edit?pli=1&gid=708300487#gid=7
08300487&range=675:675.
3. A screenshot showing, among other things, the note put on
Plaintiff's peace officer certification.
All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-08-03 (UTC+0:00)
WITNESSES
WITNESS DESCRIPTION
pleg
(@rawequals:7429
0368)
Eyewitness.
Cephal
(@CephalGPT:5
0546640)
Eyewitness.
Adam Stratton
(@AdamStratton:1
7311250)
Eyewitness. Should testify as to whether or not the Department of Justice
has had findings related to Defendant's allegations of criminality from
Plaintiff. See, e.g., Compl. Statement of Facts ¶ 16.
mattcern:47035350
Eyewitness. Should testify as to whether or not the Ridgeway State Police's
internal affairs office has had findings related to Defendant's allegations of
criminality from Plaintiff. See, e.g., Compl. Statement of Facts ¶ 15.
All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-08-03 (UTC+0:00)
sage03x:53338419
Eyewitness. Should testify as to whether or not the internal affairs office of
the Ridgeway County Sheriff's office has had findings related to
Defendant's allegations of criminality from Plaintiff. See, e.g., Compl.
Statement of Facts ¶ 15.
o72y
(@o72yss:9175432
2)
Eyewitness. Should testify as to whether or not the internal affairs office of
the Palmer Police Department has had findings related to Defendant's
allegations of criminality from Plaintiff. See, e.g., Compl. Statement of
Facts ¶ 15.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ rawequals
Plaintiff of the above-titled civil action
———————————————
———————————————
/s/ thr33six8
The Attorney of Plaintiff/Client rawequals;
Licensed Attorney in the State of Ridgeway
since July 23rd, 2026 (R.S.B. License
#19302).
