All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-07-29 (UTC+0:00)
ADM F. 200 (Rev. 03/22) Summons in a Civil Action
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
r_zuelius
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
DOCKET NO. RSC-CV-1716
Plaintiff
v.
WGT05
Defendant
SUMMONS
The plaintiff in the above-named civil action has commenced it by filing the complaint. If you are the
above-named defendant, you must appear and defend yourself. Failure to do so can result in the clerk entering
default, which begins default judgment being rendered upon the claims in the complaint. See generally Rid.
Rule Civ. Proc 37.
Because you shall file an answer pursuant to Rid. Rule Civ. Proc. 7.1.2.,, you have five (5) days to file
the aforementioned answer A copy of the complaint has been provided alongside this summons.
JUDGE / JUSTICE CLERK OF THE COURT
/s/ vonhagen123 /s/ Halo4asin
EXECUTED ON 07/31/2026 EXECUTED ON 07/31/2026
All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-07-29 (UTC+0:00)
THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
RIDGEWAY SUPERIOR COURT
R_ZUELIUS, an individual who is a citizen of
the State of Ridgeway
Plaintiff,
-against-
WGT05, in his official capacity as a corporal
of the Ridgeway State Police pursuant to The
Torts And Civil Procedure Act of 2026 §
205(d)(ⅱ)/7 R. Stat. § 121.404
Defendant.
RSC-CV-####
CIVIL COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO
RID. R. CIV. PRO. 7(A)
Presiding Judge: N/A
Plaintiff r_zuelius, proceeding with his Attorney thr33six8, hereby brings this civil action
and for their allegations against the defendants, it is alleged as follows:
STATEMENT OF FACTS
1. Before RSC-SW-4790 (Plaintiff's search warrant) was issued, Defendant WGT05, who is
also a corporal of the Ridgeway State Police, made a probable cause statement/affidavit
alongside other appropriate filings in order to apply for the search warrant.
2. On 2026-07-21 (UTC), Hon. smashcans, who is a magistrate of the Superior Court of the
State of Ridgeway, read WGT05's filing(s), and the magistrate issued the search warrant
upon Plaintiff.
3. smashcans been a trooper of the Ridgeway State Police since 2022-04-22, holding his
LETC peace officer certification since 2021-02-27. He holds the rank of Major, which
holds the responsibility of "command[ing] the activities of their respective division in
accordance with the policies established by the Central Command." RSP Pol.
201-1.1(c)(2).
4. smashcans has been a magistrate since 2026-06-14, which is when he was sworn in by
Justice Techiey.
5. Nevertheless, the search warrant was directed to the Ridgeway State Police "and any
peace officer assisting", and in its salutation, it read: "Proof by affidavit having been
made before this Court, and the Court finding probable cause to believe that evidence of
the offense of R.C.C 2.26 Unlawful Possession of a Firearm (r_zuelius found to be in
possession of multiple firearms (Stetson Cardiac-5) without valid AFL endorsement.)
will be found in or upon the place or person described below, YOU ARE
COMMANDED to search…"
6. After the header "PLACE AND/OR PERSON TO BE SEARCHED", the search warrant
read:
a. "Premises: All vehicles in possession of r_zuelius, and property of r_zuelius
which is 4200 Majellan Way.
b. Person: r_zuelius
c. Description: Known to have spiky brown hair, residence at 4200 Majellan Way
d. AND TO SEIZE the following property or things:
e. Stetson Cardiac-5
All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-07-29 (UTC+0:00)
f. EXECUTION WINDOW
g. This warrant must be executed within 10 day(s) of issuance and is VOID after
July 31, 2026.
h. CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS
i. Officer provided additional information within direct messages, I believe there is
j. sufficient PC to search all vehicles and his residence due to recent crimiminal
conduct and
k. access to illegal weapons.
l. The affidavit in support of this warrant remains SEALED by order of the Court
m. A return and inventory shall be filed with this Court promptly after execution.
n. CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS
o. Officer provided additional information within direct messages, I believe there is
p. sufficient PC to search all vehicles and his residence due to recent crimiminal
conduct and
q. access to illegal weapons.
r. The affidavit in support of this warrant remains SEALED by order of the Court.
7. On 2026-07-22 (UTC-5:00), Plaintiff r_zuelius was in the State of Ridgeway.
8. Plaintiff was speaking with RCSO Acting Sgt. ghostbleed until RSP Lt. spoookdan came
and put the plaintiff under arrest.
9. Sometime afterward, the plaintiff was taken to the RCSO Headquarters.
10. There, Defendant and RSP Cpl. WGT05 began executing a search warrant that was
issued onto Plaintiff by Hon. Mytrius. See Plaintiff's Material Exhibit (hereinafter "Pl.
Mat. Ex.") 3, which is in the initial document of disclosures attached to this complaint.
11. During his execution of the search warrant, Defendant WGT05 searched Plaintiff's purple
Gridlock, which had the license plate XRJ920, seized the two police-issued boxes of .45
ACP ammo within the car's trunk, searched Plaintiff himself, and seized a radio on his
person.
12. After the execution of the search warrant, WGT05 went to the computer behind the front
desk of the RCSO HQ's lobby and used it to book the plaintiff for R.C.C. §§ 2.26, 2.29.
The arrest's description was the following: "County Limits; Defendant was in possession
of a Radio, PI .45 ACP Ammo found in his vehicles whilst conducting a search warrant at
RCSO HQ; RCSO HQ." The arest record is 20267233ba15a35b, and it is dated at 20:47.
13. At 22:18-UTC-5:00, WGT05 sent a direct message to the plaintiff. The direct message
had the URL of the plaintiff's search wararnt receipt.
14. The search warrant receipt does not have the following oath: "I, WGT05, the officer by
whom the warrant was executed, do swear that the above inventory contains a true and
detailed account of all the property taken by me on said warrant."
15. WGT05 did not give a copy of the search warrant to the plaintiff at all.
16. WGT05 still has not given a copy of the search warrant to the plaintiff.
VENUE
Although not procedurally required, the plaintiff includes these statements on venue and
jurisdiction:
1. Venue is proper in this Court because the alleged actions took place in the State of
Ridgeway, and it is therefore subject to the laws of both the county and the state.
All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-07-29 (UTC+0:00)
2. This court, which is the Superior Court of the State of Ridgeway, "shall exercise original
jurisdiction for all civil and criminal cases or controversies under the rules as set by the
Supreme Court". R. Const. Art. Ⅴ § Ⅳ.
PARTIES
1. Plaintiff r_zuelius is a citizen of the State of Ridgeway.
2. Defendant WGT05 is a citizen of the State of Ridgeway, and he is also a corporal of the
Ridgeway State Police, the police of the State of Ridgeway pursuant to 9 R. Stat. §
223.001 ("There shall be a Ridgeway State Police, [which is] an agency of the state"). He
has also had his peace officer certification, which allows him to execute such duties, Id.
at § 222.101, since 2022-04-23. Finally, he is an attorney of the State of Ridgeway,
having license #18124, and most notably scored
TORTS
Pursuant to Rid. R. Civ. Pro. 8(a), the plaintiff includes these numbered statements which show
his entitlement of relief, and, as such, the plaintiff includes the following torts:
#1: Deprviation of Rights Under Color of Law (7 R. Stat. § 121.403)
1. Plaintiff incorporates the facts that were pled this complaint's statement of facts here as
well as earlier, adjacent statements.
2. The tort of Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law is when someone, "under color of
any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, subjects, or causes to be subjected,
any citizen of the State of Ridgeway or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the
deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and
laws…" Id.
3. Defendant WGT05 was "under any statute" during the tortfeasance because he was
on-duty as a corporal of the Ridgeway State Police, which, as established before, has
statuatory duties/authority to execute search warrants. Compl. ¶ 4.
4. Defendant WGT05 did not give the search warrant to the plaintiff after the execution of
the search warrant: since this a duty that is both (1) put on the defendant/tortfeasor and
(2) owed to the plaintiff, it is therefore a right, and Defendant WGT05 deprived Plaintiff
of this right by failing to do so. See Compl. ¶ 9; see also 6 R. Stat. § 131.014 ("Such
peace officers responsible for the execution of the search warrant ensure that a copy of
the warrant and inventory is left with the owner of the searched premises")
(emphasis added).
5. Defendant WGT05 did deprive Plaintiff of his right to be left with the search warrant
after its execution.
6. Therefore, there is a cause of action for the tort of Deprivation of Rights under Color of
Law, of which Defendant WGT05 is the tortfeasor.
#2: Official Misconduct (7 R. Stat. § 121.404)
1. Plaintiff incorporates all facts and averments here.
2. Defendant WGT05 was a public servant: he was a corporal of the Ridgeway State Police,
which is an "agency of the state". 9 R. Stat. § 223.001.
3. Defendant did commit an unauthorized act of his office/authority, as he did not give
Plaintiff neither the search warrant nor its receipt after the search warrant's execution.
All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-07-29 (UTC+0:00)
4. Plaintiff did suffer injury as he was deprived of this statutory right to receive such items.
6 R. Stat. § 131.014.
5. Therefore, there is a cause of action for the tort of Official Misconduct, of which
Defendant WGT05 is the tortfeasor.
DEMAND FOR JUDGMENT
Pursuant to Rid. R. Civ. Pro. 8(a), the plaintiff includes these statements as a "demand for
judgment" for each tort put forward:
#1: Relief for Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law
1. Plaintiff demands the following as relief for the first tort, which is Official Misconduct:
a. $10,000 in punitive damages from Defendant WGT05 himself (i.e., in his
individual capacity pursuant to 7 R. Stat. § 121.404(b)).
b. any other relief this court deems necessary.
#2: Relief for Impedance of Civil Rights
2. Plaintiff demands the following as relief for the second tort, which is Impedance of Civil
Rights:
a. an injunction enjoining Defendant WGT05 from being on duty as a trooper of the
Ridgeway State Police, effectively suspending him.
b. any other relief this court deems necessary.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ r_zuelius
Plaintiff of the above-titled civil action;
/s/ thr33six8
Timezone UTC–5:00;
The Attorney of Plaintiff/Client r_zuelius;
Licensed Attorney in the State of Ridgeway
since July 23rd, 2026 (R.S.B. License
#19302).
All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-07-29 (UTC+0:00)
THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
RIDGEWAY SUPERIOR COURT
R_ZUELIUS, an individual who is a citizen of
the State of Ridgeway
Plaintiff,
-against-
WGT05, in his official capacity as a corporal
of the Ridgeway State Police pursuant to The
Torts And Civil Procedure Act of 2026 §
205(d)(ⅱ)/7 R. Stat. § 121.404
Defendant.
RSC-CV-####
INITIAL DOCUMENT OF
DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO RID. R.
CIV. PRO. 30(A)
Presiding Judge: N/A
Plaintiff r_zuelius, proceeding with his Attorney thr33six8, hereby supplements the
complaint for the above-titled civil action with a document of disclosures.
MATERIAL
# PREVIEW + URL DESCRIPTION
1 A .gif file depicting a direct message from the Plaintiff. It has a
screenshot attached depicting his interaction with WGT05.
2 The .png file that was attached to the direct message at Pl. Mat.
Ex. 1. It depicts the plaintiff angrily confronting WGT05.
3 The search warrant receipt that was sent to the plaintiff.
Find an archival copy at this URL:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nXRq-fsBFg2iYAOP3T6WE4hC
D_kijMSw/view?usp=sharing
4 The department policies of the Ridgeway State Police (hereinafter
All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-07-29 (UTC+0:00)
cited as "RSP Pol.").
5 The database of the Ridgeway State Police, which contains the
Code of Conduct (hereinafter cited as "RSP Off.").
All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-07-29 (UTC+0:00)
WITNESSES
# NAME + USER ID STATUS
1
WGT05:176895552
Lay, eyewitness
2
dan (@spoookdan:17886821)
Lay, eyewitness
3
honda (@r_zuelius:2336165076)
Lay, eyewitness
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ r_zuelius
Plaintiff of the above-titled civil action;
/s/ thr33six8
Timezone UTC–5:00;
The Attorney of Plaintiff/Client r_zuelius;
Licensed Attorney in the State of Ridgeway
since July 23rd, 2026 (R.S.B. License
#19302).
All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-07-29 (UTC+0:00)
