All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-07-29 (UTC+0:00)
THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
RIDGEWAY SUPERIOR COURT
MURKENDAWG, an individual
Plaintiff,
-against-
DEV_TYP, an individual in his official capacity
as a sergeant of the Ridgeway County
Sheriff's Office pursuant to 7 R. Stat. §
121.404(b)
Defendant.
RSC-##-####
CIVIL COMPLAINT
Presiding Judge: Hon. N/A
Plaintiff MurkenDawg, proceeding with his attorney, who is thr33six8 Esq., hereby files
this complaint to commence the above-titled civil action.
PARTIES
1. Defendant dev_Typ is a resident of the State of Ridgeway. Hired since 2024-06-30, he is
a sergeant of the Ridgeway County Sheriff's Office, which is "an agency of the County of
Ridgeway". 9 R. Stat. § 331.001. and he has had his peace officer certification from the
Law Enforcement Training Center since 2023-01-13. His timezone is UTC–4:00.
a. He has also been licensed to practice law from the Ridgeway State Bar since
2024-06-17 (R.S.B. #10277).
2. Plaintiff MurkenDawg is a resident of the State of Ridgeway.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. This court, which is the Superior Court of the State of Ridgeway, shall "shall exercise
original jurisdiction for all civil and criminal cases or controversies under the rules as set
by the Supreme Court", R. Const. art. Ⅴ, § Ⅳ, and it shall have original jurisdiction over,
among other things, "any controversy not otherwise falling within the jurisdiction of the
Supreme Court, Administrative Court, or Magistrate Court as set forth by law". See
generally The Judiciary Act of 2026 § 302, S.B. 002, 11th Sen. (2026); 3 R. Stat. §
131.104(a–e). As the controversy is actionable here, jurisidiction is proper.
2. This court is the proper venue because civil actions shall only take place in the county
where the controversy occurs. See 7 R. Stat. §§ 131.001–131.003. Since this takes place
within the County of Ridgeway, a county of the State of Ridgeway pursuant to 9 R. Stat.
§ 321.001, venue is proper.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
1. On 2026-07-28, Plaintiff and Defendant were in the State of Ridgeway. Defendant was on
duty as a deputy of the Ridgeway County Sheriff's Office.
2. Defendant was plainclothed (i.e., wearing civilian clothing) and was driving a white
Lancaster with tinted windows.
3. On Cypress St in Sterling, at around 20:39 (UTC+0:00), Defendant was boxed in by
KREW2012, who was driving a stock Actila Sport, and proboy1012, who was driving a
red pickup truck. rawequals, who was driving a green Pioneer, was nearby, and nearby
were Plaintiff and CadenzaBotticelli.
4. Plaintiff and the others were all in their car.
5. rawequals, who bore a Komrad automatic rifle, came out of his car, approached
Defendant, and went back to his car; rawequals "juked" Defendant.
6. Afterwards, Defendant got out of his car, drew his department-issued Stetson Cardiac-5
submachine gun, and opened fire on rawequals, who had just gotten in the driver's seat of
his green Pioneer.
7. CadenzaBotticelli, KREW2012, MurkenDawg, and rawequals got out of their cars and
opened fire on Defendant. Defendant killed rawequals, but then he was shot and killed by
CadenzaBotticelli as he tried to find cover at 20:39:54.
8. At 20:41:10, an amber Actila with tinted windows, which was driven by Defendant, came
to Cypress St.
9. Defendant drove up before Plaintiff, who was sitting in their stock Actila Sport.
10. Defendant got out of his car, drew his department-issued Stetson Cardiac-5, got on the
hood of Plaintiff's car, and opened fire on Plaintiff, shooting him once in the head and
damaging his vehicle.
11. rawequals and CadenzaBotticelli opened fire on Defendant shortly after, and he was shot
and killed; proboy1012 was nearby in a similiarly colored (amber) pickup truck.
TORTS
Pursuant to Rid. Rule Civ. Proc. 8(a), the plaintiff includes these numbered statements which
show his entitlement of relief, and, as such, the plaintiff includes the following torts:
#1: Official Misconduct (7 R. Stat. § 121.404)
1. Plaintiff incorporates all facts and averments that were pled.
2. Defendant dev_Typ was a public servant: he was on duty as a deputy of the Ridgeway
County Sheriff's Office. Compl. Statement of Facts ¶¶ 1–2; see also Compl. Parties ¶ 1.
3. Defendant dev_Typ did commit an unauthorized act of his office/authority: he tried to kill
Plaintiff while Plaintiff was doing nothing, which is outside of both his statutory
authority, which comes from 9 R. Stat. § 331.201, and authority per policy. See, e.g.,
Ridgeway County Sheriff's Office Code of Conduct § 2.03 (defining use of force
violations as "inappropriate deployment of force on an individual in a manner that
escalates the situation or is not in-line with the teachings of the Law Enforcement
Training Center or the regulations outlined in [Ridgeway County Sheriff's Office
Department Handbook § 303]").
4. Plaintiff was shot in the head once, and his vehicle was damaged by Defendant's gunfire,
which satisfies the "concrete injury" prong of this cause of action. 7 R. Stat. § 121.404(a)
("The plaintiff must prove that the official misconduct from that individual caused
concrete injury to himself…").
5. For the foregoing reasons, there is a cause of action for the tort of Official Misconduct, of
which Defendant dev_Typ is the tortfeasor.
6. Plaintiff need not argue more. E.g., Rid. Rule Civ. Proc. 8(a); Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S.
662 (2009) (sufficient factual matter is enough to plead); see also, e.g., Fed. Rule. Civ.
Proc. 8(a)(2).
#2: Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law (7 R. Stat. § 121.403)
1. Plaintiff incorporates all facts and averments that were pled.
2. Defendant dev_Typ was acting under state statute as he was on duty as a deputy of the
Ridgeway County Sheriff's Office. Compl. Statement of Facts ¶¶ 1–2; see also Compl.
Parties ¶ 1.
3. Defendant dev_Typ used unreasonably used excessive force on Plaintiff, which infringed
Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizure. Graham v.
Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 395 (1989) (Rehnquist, C.J.) ("...all claims that law enforcement
officers have used excessive force-deadly or not-in the course of an arrest, investigatory
stop, or other 'seizure' of a free citizen should be analyzed under the Fourth Amendment
and its 'reasonableness' standard…"); see also Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1, 25
(O'Connor, J., dissenting) ("For purposes of Fourth Amendment analysis, I agree with the
Court that Officer Hymon 'seized' Gamer by shooting him.")
4. For the foregoing reasons, there is a cause of action for the tort of Deprivation of Rights
under Color of Law, of which Defendant dev_Typ is the tortfeasor.
RELIEF
Plaintiff is entitled to and requests the following:
1. $10,000 in puntitive damages. 7 R. Stat. § 121.404.
2. Pursuant to Id., at § 121.403, an injunction enjoining Defendant dev_Typ from being on
duty as a deputy of the Ridgeway County Sheriff's Office for 14 days, effectively
suspending him.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ MurkenDawg
Plaintiff of the above-titled civil action;
/s/ thr33six8
Timezone UTC–5:00;
The Attorney of Plaintiff/Client
MurkenDawg;
Licensed Attorney in the State of Ridgeway
since July 23rd, 2026 (R.S.B. License
#19302).
