All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-07-28 (UTC+0:00)
ADM F. 200 (Rev. 03/22) Summons in a Civil Action
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
Icecoldwateryes
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
DOCKET NO. RSC-CV-8006
Plaintiff
v.
WGT05
Respondent
SUMMONS
The plaintiff in Icecoldwateryes v. WGT05 (RSC-CV-8006) has commenced a civil action. If you are
the above-named defendant, you must appear and defend yourself. Failure to do so can result in the clerk
entering default, which begins default judgment being rendered upon the claims in the complaint. See generally
Rid. R. Civ. Pro. 36(a).
Because you shall file an answer pursuant to Rid. R. Civ. Pro. 7(a), you have five (5) days to file the
aforementioned answer pursuant to Id. at 5(e). A copy of the complaint has been provided alongside this
summons.
JUDGE / JUSTICE CLERK OF THE COURT
/s/ vonhagen123 /s/
EXECUTED ON 07/28/2026 EXECUTED ON 07/28/2026
All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-07-28 (UTC+0:00)
THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
RIDGEWAY SUPERIOR COURT
ICECOLDWATERYES, an individual
Petitioner
-against-
WGT05, in his official capacity as a corporal
of the Ridgeway State Police pursuant to 7 R.
Stat. § 121.404(a)
Defendant.
RSC-CV-8006
CIVIL COMPLAINT
Presiding Judge: Magistrate Hon.
vonhagen123
Plaintiff Icecoldwateryes, proceeding with his attorney, who is thr33six8, hereby brings
this civil action and for their allegations against the defendant, it is alleged as follows:
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. This court, which is the Superior Court of the State of Ridgeway, shall "shall exercise
original jurisdiction for all civil and criminal cases or controversies under the rules as set
by the Supreme Court", R. Const. art. Ⅴ, § Ⅳ, and it shall have original jurisdiction over,
among other things, "any controversy not otherwise falling within the jurisdiction of the
Supreme Court, Administrative Court, or Magistrate Court as set forth by law". See
generally The Judiciary Act of 2026 § 302, S.B. 002, 11th Sen. (2026); 3 R. Stat. §
131.104(a–e). As the controversy is actionable here, jurisidiction is proper.
2. This court is the proper venue because civil actions shall only take place in the county
where the controversy occurs. See 7 R. Stat. §§ 131.001–131.003. Since this takes place
within the County of Ridgeway, a county of the State of Ridgeway pursuant to 9 R. Stat.
§ 321.001, venue is proper.
PARTIES
1. Defendant WGT05 is a resident of the State of Ridgeway. He is a corporal of the
Ridgeway State Police. He has held his peace officer certification from the Law
Enforcement Training Center since 2024-04-23.
2. Plaintiff Icecoldwateryes is an individual who is a resident of the State of Ridgeway. He
is a new player to the State of Ridgeway.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
1. On 2026-07-24 (July 24th, 2026) (UTC–5:00), Plaintiff was in the State of Ridgeway.
2. Plaintiff was put under arrest by RSP Cpl. WGT05, who is a Senior Operator within
RSP's SWAT division, a tactical team made by 9 R. Stat. § 223.404(a), and WGT05 took
the Plaintiff to the warrant garage at RCSO sub.
3. When WGT05 put Plaintiff under arrest, WGT05 had not seen him commit a crime. The
corporal also knew that Plaintiff was doing nothing in particular upon the arrest.
4. Aditionally, Plaintiff had neither a search warrant nor an arrest warrant out for him.
5. Plaintiff was put in the back of a State Police Executor, which WGT05 spawned on the
law enforcement vehicle spawning pad.
All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-07-28 (UTC+0:00)
6. thr33six8, who was looking for d_arkshadws, was in front of RCSO sub and saw the
Executor.
7. While the plaintiff was in the Executor, there was another, handcuffed individual inside
the Executor.
8. According to department policy, the State Police Executor is authorized for use by SWAT,
warrant execution purposes, and whoever individually designated by RSP's central
command, which contains troopers who are or have a rank greater than Major. RSP Pol.
601-2.1(L)(a–b); unauthorized usage can result in light punishment. RSP. Off. § 3.03(a).
9. Executors from all departments, alongside the Percivel Governance, a bulletproof limo,
are often used by RSP, RCSO, and PPD for mobilizing their tactical teams, storing and
destroying contraband obtained from executing a search warrant, and other, abnormal
cases where extra armor is needed to execute duties.
10. At 16:37 (UTC–5:00), Plaintiff sent a message in the #general-chatroom channel of the
State of Ridgeway's Discord server, mentioning1 WGT05 and saying: "what are you
holding me for".
11. Two minutes later, Plaintiff messaged, "k well since ur not saying anything im just
leaving". WGT05 replied, "i said do not leave".
12. Plaintiff then messaged that he does not have chat (i.e., he cannot see any chat messages
outside of Quick Words) and requested WGT05 to use his protest sign, which everyone in
Ridgeway has on them at all times, to sign to Plaintiff.
13. thr33six8 mentioned Plaintiff and messaged: "wya". Plaintiff replied, "i already left its
chill", and that "dude was holdin me in a bearcat not saying anything 😭".
14. At 16:42, RSP Tpr. rokutbh messaged "w looks" and mentioned Plaintff with this image
(Plaintiff is the user thumbnail on the right):
a.
15. Two minutes later, v_masuka mentioned Plaintiff and messaged, "comply with law
enforcement to be unbanned", and Plaintiff replied a minute later, "i didnt have a sw
dawg".
1 "mention" is official Discord terminology. Colloquially, it's called "pinging".
All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-07-28 (UTC+0:00)
16. WGT05 messaged, "ur going to in t-5 minutes". Plaintiff messaged, "well thats not my
fault", and he also messaged, "i didnt currently have a sw".
17. WGT05 messaged, "uh not your fault for LTAA?". Plaintiff messaged, "yeah so it
shouldnt be a perma" and then messaged, "like what".
18. WGT05 messaged, "you LTAA and happened to be in the process of getting a SW so it
turns into ban until compliance", and he then messaged, "thats ur fault for quitting".
19. Plaintiff messaged, "and u never said anything". WGT05 messaged, "I did", and Plaintiff
messaged, "well i dont have chats". WGT05 messaged, "u cant see my chat ingame".
20. Plaintiff messaged, "tell me through a sign", then messaged "???"
21. BloxWatch_CD came and messaged to Plaintiff, "Bro just leave the game Everytime u
get in cuffs". Plaintiff replied, "THATS WHAT I DID".
22. v_masuka said to Plaintiff that his ban was permanent until he complied with WGT05
and turned himself in. He maintained that "It's pretty fuckin obvious when you're put in a
bearcat in a garage". WGT05 added that Plaintiff was caught with department-issued
equipment. v_masuka messaged, "You're being unbanned, rejoin the game and comply
with LEO".
TORTS
Pursuant to Rid. R. Civ. Pro. 8(a), the plaintiff includes these numbered statements which show
his entitlement of relief, and, as such, the plaintiff includes the following torts:
#1: Official Misconduct (7 R. Stat. § 121.404)
1. Plaintiff incorporates all facts and averments here.
2. Defendant WGT05 was on duty as a trooper of the Ridgeway State Police, which is
established "an agency of the state". 9 R. Stat. § 223.001; he is therefore a public servant.
3. WGT05 put Plaintiff under arrest. As stated, Plaintiff was doing nothing in particular, and
he had no warrant out: WGT05, therefore, did not have any facts or evidence that
Plaintiff had committed, was committing, or would committ a crime in his presence:
WGT05's authority on making warrantless arrests is limited to crimes committed in his
presence. See Id., at § 223.002 ("The State Police shall hold the authority of sworn peace
officers, as set forth in [6 R. Stat. § 131.006], to enforce the laws of the state, and may
effectuate an arrest, without warrant, against any person who, in the presence of a state
trooper, is engaged in the violation of any such laws."). This is an unauthorized function
of his office as a peace officer.
4. As WGT05 put Plaintiff under arrest outside of his authority, Plaintiff's rights were
violated.
#2: Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law (7 R. Stat. § 121.403)
1. Plaintiff incorporates all facts and averments here.
2. As argued, the arrest of Plaintiff was outside of WGT05's office/authority, and, therefore,
it is an illegal, unreasonable arrest: it goes against Plaintiff's rights to be free from such
arrests. E.g., R. Const. art. Ⅰ, § Ⅷ ("That the people have a right to hold themselves,
their houses, papers, and possessions, free from search or seizure"); U.S. Const. amend.
All dates and times are in ISO 8601 format unless otherwise specified.
Filed on 2026-07-28 (UTC+0:00)
Ⅳ ("The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,
against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall
issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly
describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."); see also R.
Const. art. Ⅰ § Ⅴ ("That every member of society hath a right to be protected in the
enjoyment of life, liberty, and property…").
3. Therefore, Defendant WGT05 committed this tort: he deprived Plaintiff of his rights to be
free from unreasonable arrests.
RELIEF
Plaintiff is entitled to and requests the following:
1. $10,000 in punitive damages on Defendant WGT05 pursuant to 7 R. Stat. § 121.404.
2. Pursuant to Id., at § 121.403, an injunction ordering that Defendant WGT05 be
suspended from the Ridgeway State Police for 10 days.
DATED: 2026-07-25
Respectfully submitted,
———————————————
/s/ thr33six8
Attorney of Icecoldwateryes;
Licensed Attorney in the State of Ridgeway
since July 23rd, 2026 (R.S.B. License
#19302).
