IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
DOCKET NO. RSC-CM-7105
Presiding Judge: Hon. Mytrius
v.
AMPLI
Defendant
STATE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY
COMES NOW the State of Ridgeway, by and through the undersigned State Attorney
Gamer80sStyle, and respectfully submits this Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for
Discovery. For the reasons set forth below, the motion should be denied.
INTRODUCTION
Following the arraignment and initial hearing of the case State v. Ampli, on July 14, 2026, the
State had filed their initial discovery and compliance with this Honorable Court. Pursuant to Rid. R.
Crim. P. 14(b), the State had asked the defendant to produce their discovery as required. A pretrial
hearing was conducted on July 25th and this Court extended the initial discovery period to the end of
July 27th 2026 after a notice of appearance of counsel for the Defendant was filed on the date of the
hearing. The Defendant has subsequently filed a motion for Discovery asking the State to provide
deliverables on the matter of the search warrant as applied to the Defendant.
LEGAL ARGUMENT
1. THE STATE HAS SATISFIED ITS DISCOVERY OBLIGATIONS.
a. The State MUST disclose discoverable materials within its possession, custody, or
control, see Rid. R. Crim. P. 14(a). The State has complied with that obligation by
producing all discoverable materials within its possession, custody, or control. Because
the requested materials are not within the State's possession, custody, or control, the State
cannot produce them.
2. DEFENDANT SEEKS MATERIALS NOT WITHIN THE STATE'S POSSESSION,
CUSTODY, OR CONTROL
a. The Defendant requests production of the search warrant number, the search warrant, the
warrant application and supporting affidavit, warrant registry records, and the identity of
the warrant applicant. The State does not possess these requested materials.
CONCLUSION
WHEREFORE, the State respectfully requests that this Court DENY Defendant's Motion for
Discovery, find that the State has satisfied its obligations under Rule 14, and grant such other relief as
the Court deems just and proper.
Respectfully submitted,
ADAMSTRATTON
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF RIDGEWAY
By:
Gamer80sStyle, Esquire
State Attorney, Major Crimes Division
R. Bar No. 10168
1100 Lakeside Drive
Palmer, Ridgeway 80013
Counsel for the State of Ridgeway
