Ridgeway Unified Courts

JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF RIDGEWAY

Searchable full text

7,281 characters extracted

—

THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY RIDGEWAY SUPERIOR COURT the STATE OF RIDGEWAY Prosecution, -against- AMPLI, an individual Defendant. RSC-CM-7105 DEFENDANT'S SECOND INITIAL DISCLOSURES Presiding Judge: Hon. Mytrius Defendant hereby files these initial disclosures of evidence and witnesses. MATERIAL EVIDENCE # PREVIEW + URL DESCRIPTION 1 A picture of Ampli's records. Shows an arrest made by RSP Tpr. jyyvznn. 2 Screenshot taken from Pro. Ex. A (Prosecution's Exhibit A), the video of Tpr. jyyvznn executing Ampli's search warrant. Note what the radio says: 3 The department policy of the Ridgeway State Police. 4 The code of conduct of the Ridgeway State Police. 6 A message sent by Arthur_Chen in the #government-updates channel in the State of Ridgeway's Discord server. Sent on 2026-04-25 (UTC). The image attached to the message is here for reference. 7 Gov. Rathuzen's message on nominating AdamStratton. Press release is https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bvBkInpDQJx7gKcLBUcSyUzvQ oeMxcEJ/view, and the nomination itself is https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Gl9lrfSN3hfUbXkLyyCeCD_11yC vUnUI/view. 8 Message for the election ballots for the Summer 2026 election, which was sent on 2026-06-19. AdamStratton runs for Attorney General. 9 The Law Enforcement Training Center's database. It shows that AdamStratton has held his peace officer certification since 2024-04-09. 1 0 Election results. On 2026-06-22, at 18:39 (UTC–5:00), AdamStratton is elected to be the Attorney General. 1 1 A message from a judge showing AdamStratton being sworn in. Posted at 22:40. 1 2 The #casehawk-help channel in the Discord server of the Superior Court of the State of Ridgeway. Note that the picture here is just a preview and not the actual exhibit: the channel itself is the exhibit. This was mainly admitted to prove an expert witness's qualifications. See generally Rid. R. Evid. 44. 1 3 A screenshot showing an example of a warrant as it appears on the Executed Warrants Register, which is public and contains warrants that have already been executed. 1 4 An URL that leads to the "how-to" webpage for probable-cause statements and warrant applications. 1 5 A .mp4 file of Defendant's attorney going through Defendant's records on 2026-07-26. Note that the attorney's timezone is UTC–5:00. WITNESSES # NAME DESCRIPTION 1 rein (@Reindownload: 95471686) Eyewitness. 2 W3iss (@WeissScubas:5 22538512) Eyewitness. 3 jyy (@jyyvznn:82993 32482) Eyewitness. 4 Ghost (@ghostbleed:197 99778) Eyewitness. 5 TheVillageLion:5 893136 Eyewitness. 6 Adam Stratton (@AdamStratton: 5893136) Eyewitness. For Rid. R. Evid. 28 purposes, this person has sufficient personal knowledge about Ampli's search warrant because Pro. Ex. A and Def. Mat. Ex. 3 (Defendant's Material Exhibit) show that AdamStratton issued Ampli's search warrant. 7 cans (@smashcans:117 093679) Eyewitness. For Rid. R. Evid. 28 purposes, this person has sufficient personal knowledge about what AdamStratton was doing because Pro. Ex. A shows that he was on the courts team. 8 imnotRummy:528 12279 Expert witness. Pursuant to Rid. R. Evid. 14, I declare this person to be qualified in experience and education as to the frontend and backend of the courts website, the caseHAWK bot, and the court's documented API. 9 Ampli:43603187 Eyewitness. NO CERT. OF COMPLIANCE Defendant does not file a certificate of compliance with this document of disclosures until the prosecution responds to Defendant's discovery, which should be filed alongside this document of disclosures: Defendant is not obligated to file a certificate of compliance at this time. See Rid. R. Crim. Pro. 14(a)(1)(B). DATED: 2026-07-26 (July 26th, 2026) Respectfully submitted, ——————————————— /s/ thr33six8 The Attorney of Defendant/Client Ampli; Licensed Attorney in the State of Ridgeway since July 23rd, 2026 (R.S.B. License #19302). THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY RIDGEWAY SUPERIOR COURT the STATE OF RIDGEWAY Prosecution, -against- AMPLI, an individual Defendant. RSC-CM-7105 DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY Presiding Judge: Hon. Mytrius Pursuant to Rid. R. Crim. Pro. 14(a)(2), Defendant hereby moves to discover the following from the prosecution: MATERIAL AND FACTS TO BE DISCOVERED 1. The warrant number (something like RSC-SW-####) of Ampli's search warrant. 2. The paper warrant of Ampli's search warrant. 3. The warrant application (including any affidavit) that was filed in court for Ampli's search warrant. 4. A picture of Ampli's search warrant as it would appear on the warrant registry (NOT the executed search warrant registry) or a full representation of the search warrant on the website. 5. Who made the warrant application. PROCEDURAL JUSTIFICATION Pursuant to Rid. R. Crim. Pro. 13(a)(2), this part of the motion contains reasons and, therefore, shall be separately numbered. 1. It is procedurally appropriate for Defendant to move for discovery. 1. Here, Defendant may move for discovery even though a pre-trial conference had occurred because the conference resulted in the extension of the discovery period: Defendant belives this is a good cause for consideration of this motion. See Id., at 13(d)(1). 2. Defendant is also procedurally entitled to move for discovery because the prosecution has already filed its certificate of compliance. Id., at 14(a)(1)(B). 2. The requested material/facts are not privileged. 3. Procedurally, a privilege is "an exception to the general duty of a witness to offer evidence." Rid. R. Evid. 19(a). These privileges are sometimes not absolute though, and they have the least priority out of most issues: if something like a constitutional right comes into play, then privilege is advised to be ignored. See generally Id., at 19(b); see also Id., at 20(a–d) ("Except as otherwise provided by constitution, statute, rules promulgated by the Supreme Court, or the common law, no person has a privilege to: refuse to be a witness, refuse to disclose any matter, refuse to produce any object or writing, or prevent another from being a witness or disclosing any matter or producing any object or writing.") 4. So, it comes at no shock that the prosecution may claim privilege over these materials because search warrants are sealed. However, executed search warrants become public record, which is why the Superior Court of the State of Ridgeway displays not just executed search warrants on the search warrant registry, but their returns and services as well. Why claim privilege on something public? MOVANT'S AFFIDAVIT Since pre-trial motions require an affidavit supporting the facts upon which this motion is based, Rid. R. Crim. Pro. 13(a)(2), Defendant swears under the penalties of perjury, a convictible only felony within the State of Ridgeway pursuant to R.C.C. § 2.10, the following: Sworn Statement Before I moved for discovery, I, thr33six8, saw that one of the prosecution's admitted exhibits shows that AdamStratton was behind Ampli's search warrant. Later on, I also took notice of the executed warrant registry, which is on the website of the Ridgeway. FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT. DATED: 2026-07-26 (July 26th, 2026) Respectfully submitted, ——————————————— /s/ thr33six8 The Attorney of Defendant/Client Ampli; Licensed Attorney in the State of Ridgeway since July 23rd, 2026 (R.S.B. License #19302).

State_of_Ridgeway_v._Ampli_RSC-CM-7105_disclosures.pdf

Original document

Searchable full text

Document record