THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
RIDGEWAY SUPERIOR COURT
ASPENFUN, an individual
Plaintiff,
-against-
MASTERQV, an individual
Defendant.
RSC-CV-8952
ANSWER TO THE PLAINTIFF'S
COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO RID R.
CIV. PRO. 7(A)
Presiding Judge: Hon. Mytrius
Pursuant to Rid. R. Civ. Pro. 7(a), Defendant masterqv, proceeding with his attorney, who
is thr33six8 Esq., hereby files this answer to the plaintiff's complaint.
ANSWERS TO AVERMENTS
Defendant makes the following answers to the consecutively numbered averments (facts)
within the complaint pursuant to Rid. R. Civ. Pro. 7(b) (A party shall state in short and plain
terms his defenses to such claim asserted and shall admit or deny the averments upon which the
adverse party relies):
Preliminary Statement (Pl. Compl. ¶¶ 1–5)
1. Admitted in part, denied in part: Defendant admits the averment that Plaintiff
aspenfun is a "member of the [Ridgeway] Department of Transportation", but denies all
else.
2. Denied: Defendant does not know how many vehicles Plaintiff has impounded
throughout his career, so Defendant is "without knowledge or information sufficient to
form a belief as to the truth of [this] averment". Therefore, it constitutes denial. Rid. R.
Civ. Pro. 7(b); E.g., Ridgeway National Rifle Association v. largeTitanic2, Rid. Superior
Ct. RSC-CV-881 (2023) (civil action where defendant's counsel totoro987123 denied
many averments on the same grounds).
3. Denied: Defendant does not know of any recent attacks upon the Plaintiff. Id.
4. Denied.
5. Denied.
Parties (Pl. Compl. ¶¶ 6–7)
6. Admitted.
7. Admitted.
Jurisdiction (Pl. Compl. ¶¶ 8–9)
8. Admitted in part, denied in part: Defendant admits the averment that "The Court has
subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to Ridgeway Const. art. V, § IV
because the claims arise under…laws of the State of Ridgeway", but denies the
avernment that the aforementioned claims arise "under the Constitution".
9. Admitted: Defendant notes that Rid. R. Civ. Pro. does not put a duty on the pleader to
prove venue, but it is common practice to always admit averments to venue. E.g.,
xLaZerify v. StudsPerSecond, Rid. Superior Ct. RSC-CV-832 (2022) (civil action where
defendant's counsel stickza admitted the averment of venue "for the shit" in the answer).
Factual Background (Pl. Compl. ¶¶ 10–15)
10. Admitted.
11. Admitted in part, denied in part: Defendant admits the averment that "At some point,
the Defendant, driving a vehicle, drove up beside Mr. aspenfun’s tow truck", denies the
averment that he was driving "on the wrong side of the road", the averment that the
Defendant "'told him that 'rawequals seends his regards mate'", and the averment that
"Mr. aspenfun said 'cool' and walked away to return to his work."
12. Denied.
13. Denied.
14. Denied.
15. Denied.
Causes of Action, First (Pl. Compl. ¶¶ 16–24)
Defendant denies the averments/facts put forward in this part of the complaint.
Causes of Action, Second (Pl. Compl. ¶¶ 25–31)
Defendant denies the averments/facts put forward in this part of the complaint.
Causes of Action, Third (Pl. Compl. ¶¶ 25–39)
Defendant denies the statements/facts put forward in this part of the complaint.
Prayer For Relief (Pl. Compl. ¶ 40(a–d))
Defendant denies the statements/facts put forward in this part of the complaint.
DATED: 2026-07-25 (July 25th, 2026)
Respectfully submitted,
———————————————
/s/ thr33six8
The Attorney of Defendant/Client masterqv;
Licensed Attorney in the State of Ridgeway
since July 23rd, 2026 (R.S.B. License
#19302).
