THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
RIDGEWAY SUPERIOR COURT
THR33SIX8 and NAMAENASHI, who is under a
pseudonym,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
The STATE OF RIDGEWAY, and the RIDGEWAY
COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE.
Defendants.
RSC-CV-####
CIVIL COMPLAINT
Presiding Judge: N/A
Proceeding without counsel, Plaintiff THR33SIX8 and another Plaintiff, whose username
shall be the pseudonym NAMAENASHI, hereby bring this civil action and for their allegations
against the defendants, it is alleged as follows:
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Plaintiff thr33six8
1. On 2026-05-06 (UTC-5:00), Plaintiff thr33six8 was in the State of Ridgeway.
2. Plaintiff was with members of the Ridgeway People's Front (hereinafter "RPF"), whose
members wear a black BDU with the Front's icon.
3. Around 23:47:00-5:00, Plaintiff thr33six8, who had a Stetson M1, a lightsaber, a
lockpick, and a TB26 taser, went into the state capitol to find His Excellency Rathuzen.
4. When Plaintiff thr33six8 got to the senate president's office, he saw His Excellency with
Senatrix Dankesche and Milton City Police Department Officer nisicult in the office.
5. Senatrix Dankesche was performing fellatio on His Excellency.
6. Plaintiff thr33six8 broke into the office, shot and killed the senatrix and officer, tased His
Excellency, then killed His Excellency with the lightsaber.
7. At 2026-05-07T00:02:17-5:00, Plaintiff thr33six8 used a taser on Ridgeway County
Sheriff's Office Deputy Mrcop_dude outside of a farm house on Alderpoint Rd.
8. Plaintiff thr33six8 killed the deputy with a lightsaber.
9. htctracker, who was in front of the deputy, saw ¶¶ 7, 8.
10. At 00:03:00-5:00, Plaintiff thr33six8 tried to use the taser on Dankesche, who was
on-duty as a trooper of the Ridgeway State Police.
11. The taser did not connect, and then Plaintiff shot and killed Dankesche with a Stetson
M2-A.
12. Lieutenant Colonel Antxz_y then got into a shootout with Plaintiff thr33six8, and
Plaintiff thr33six8 then won the shootout.
13. A search warrant for Plaintiff thr33six8 was issued by then Judge ghostbleed.
14. On 2026-05-09, at 14:30:21-5:00, Plaintiff thr33six8, who was driving a black Lancaster,
used the taser on on-duty Ridgeway National Guard Private First Class jdidfc2345
outside of the western gate of the national guard's base.
15. Plaintiff thr33six8 killed the guardsman with a lightsaber.
16. At some time, Plaintiff thr33six8, who had a Barrage 1014 and was the occupant of a
stock Actila Sport, would lose the taser in a police-involved shootout on Alderpoint Rd
and Opal Ave because he was carrying it.
17. On 2026-06-08, Plaintiff thr33six8 was booked by RCSO Deputy smellychickennuggies
at the headquarters of the Ridgeway County Sheriff's Office for R.C.C. § 3.01.
18. Plaintiff had killed the deputy, a detainee, and Deputy NicValdev.
19. The record, which is 202669ba9efa8b8, had this description: "OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS;
SUSPECT LOCKPICKED THEIR WAY INTO THE BOOKING ROOM, SHOOTING
AND KILLING TWO PEACE OFFICERS AND A SUSPECT IN CUSTODY; RCSO
HQ".
20. On 2026-06-09, Plaintiff thr33six8 tried to ambush RCSO Deputy and Defendant
FLUFFINGTONNIKOLAEV with a Stetson M2-A outside of RCSO sub.
21. Plaintiff thr33six8 lost the ensuing gunfight.
22. Plaintiff thr33six8 respawned by the barbershop in Sterling.
23. At 14:12:36-5:00, as soon as Plaintiff thr33six8 respawned by the barbershop in Sterling
Heights, the deputy saw him spawn in, and the deputy unholstered his TB26 taser and
used it on Plaintiff thr33six8 while the plaintiff was crossing the street.
24. Plaintiff thr33six8 fell head first on the road.
25. As the defendant was transporting the plaintiff to RCSO HQ, Plaintiff sent a message in
the Ridgeway's #general-chatroom channel mentioning the deputy, which read: "why u
got me in cuffs?"
26. Defendant replied "you have search warrant".
27. When the defendant parked inside of the RCSO HQ's warrant garage, RCSO Sergeant
ghostbleed, who is a traffic unity deputy, was watching defendant's car, and he came
down from the HQ's roof.
28. ghostbleed closed the door through which the defendant went while defendant was
walking with the plaintiff toward the front desk.
29. The defendant put the plaintiff in the holding cell.
30. Then-probationary RCSO Deputy 818saku and RSP Lieutenant Dankesche, who was
plainclothed, came into the room.
31. At 14:16:44-5:00, RCSO:SRT Deputy WGT05 joined. He was plainclothed.
32. WGT05 does not have a burn permit.
33. At 14:16:50-5:00, RCSO:AOU Deputy First Class lmBigPoe, who also holds duties in
SRT, joined. He was wearing the RCSO:SRT BDU.
34. lmBigPoe has held his burn permit since 2026-05-23.
35. lmBigPoe put Plaintiff thr33six8 in the back of an Executor, which was spawned by
WGT05.
36. lmBigPoe spawned one of Plaintiff's Gridlocks. The Gridlock had the license plate
GR1DLOCK.
37. At 14:20:37-5:00, lmBigPoe began his search of the Gridlock's trunk.
38. At 14:20:53-5:00, he finished his search.
39. 3 seconds later, he put Plaintiff back in the Executor.
40. At 14:21:09-5:00, he began another search of the Gridlock's trunk.
41. At 14:21:23-5:00, he finished the search.
42. At 14:21:32-5:00, he began shooting at the Gridlock with his Stetson Cardiac-5.
43. At 14:21:43-5:00, his gunfire destroyed the Gridlock.
44. As the Gridlock was about to blow up, WGT05 unholstered his Para 17 and fired one
shot.
45. Afterwards, lmBigPoe conducted a controlled burn on Plaintiff thr33six8's black
Gridlock, which had 31 Para 17s.
46. As lmBigPoe was shooting the Gridlock, WGT05 was shooting the Gridlock too.
47. WGT05 has never had a burn permit in the State of Ridgeway.
48. When the search warrant ended, lmBigPoe arrested Plaintiff thr33six8.
Plaintiff NamaeNashi
1. On 2026-06-20, Plaintiff NamaeNashi was in Ridgeway.
2. There, they had a search warrant.
3. The scope of the search warrant was not given to them.
4. The item(s) sought after in the search warrant were not told to them.
5. The expiration date of the search warrant was not given to them.
6. They found themselves in custody of the Ridgeway County Sheriff’s Office for the search
warrant.
7. RCSO Deputy WGT05 executed their search warrant.
8. In the receipt, it was written that a blue Gridlock with 13 boxes of .45 ACP was burned,
three TB26 tasers were taken from their home on 4300 Majellan Way, and so was a
suppressed cline.
9. As soon as WGT05 took their suppressed cline, he died.
VENUE
1. Venue is proper in this Court because the alleged actions took place in Sterling Heights
and the City of Palmer, which are parts of Ridgeway County and the State of Ridgeway,
and it is therefore subject to the laws of both the county and the state.
2. This court, which is the Superior Court of the State of Ridgeway, "shall exercise original
jurisdiction for all civil and criminal cases or controversies under the rules as set by the
Supreme Court". R. Const. Art. Ⅴ § Ⅳ.
PARTIES
1. The STATE OF RIDGEWAY, which is a defendant of this civil action, is the state in which
this civil action is commenced. It has Ridgeway county in it pursuant to 9 R. Stat. §
321.001. It is a defendant as its government is being sued.
2. The RIDGEWAY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, which is a defendant of this civil aciton, is the
sheriff's office of Ridgeway County pursuant to 9 R. Stat. § 331.001.
3. MCPD, which is a defendant of this civil action, is the law enforcement agency of the
City of Milton pursuant to 9 R. Stat. § 361.001.
4. RSP, which is a defendant of this civil action, is a law enforcement agency created by 9
R. Stat. § 223.001.
5. Plaintiff thr33six8 is a resident of the State of Ridgeway, and he is unemployed.
6. The other Plaintiff in this civil action, who shall be known under the pseudonym
NamaeNashi, is a resident of the State of Ridgeway. Under said name, pronoun use is
limited to they/them.
STATEMENT OF CLASS
Although it’s not required by the rules of procedure, plaintiffs include a statement regarding the
civil action’s prerequisites for becoming a class action under Rid. R. Civ. Pro. 18(a) in order to
show that said prerequisites have been met.
1. A joinder of the plaintiffs’ claims would be impracticable because a class of two
members proceeding in one case is better than one plaintiff joining another plaintiff via
filing a joinder, which requires two separate cases.
2. The questions of law presented here are the same and therefore in common because the
plaintiffs’ claims are all (1) from the same statutes, which are 7 R. Stat. §§ 121.403 &
121.404, (2) arise from constitutional rights, and (3) involve search warrants that have
been executed by RCSO deputies.
3. The claims are typical because the facts and questions of law are similar if not the same.
4. Having the plaintiffs’ civil action proceed as a class action is in the interest of all
members of the class.
TORTS
(1) Impedance of Civil Rights
(The Torts And Civil Procedure Act of 2026 § 207(a)/7 R. Stat. § 122.101)
1. Plaintiffs incorporate the facts from the statement of facts.
2. The Plaintiffs allege that the State of Ridgeway is the tortfeasor of this tort.
3. Plaintiffs have an U.S. Const. amend. Ⅳ right "to be secure in their persons, houses,
papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures", an U.S. Const. amend.
ⅩⅣ § 1 right to due process of "life, liberty, or property", an U.S. Const. amend. Ⅷ right
from "cruel and unusual punishments", a R. Const. Art. Ⅰ § Ⅴ right "to be protected in
the enjoyment of life, liberty, and property," and a R. Const. Art. Ⅰ § Ⅷ right "to hold
themselves, their houses, papers, and possessions, free from search or seizure."
4. Since the Plaintiffs have a right to not just have the property but "enjoy" it, the Plaintiffs
are expected to have the property prevail in all possible circumstances in order for them
to keep enjoying the property.
5. 9 R. Stat. § 342.201 states, "An authorized peace officer, firefighter, or fire investigator
may conduct a controlled burn of a vehicle only where the vehicle has been moved to a
secluded location with little to no risk for the ignition of wilderness or damage to
property, and may conduct a burn through the use of munitions", and Id. at 342.203
states, "no vehicle shall be destroyed in a controlled burn except where the vehicle
contains more than fifteen (15) firearms which, under the laws of the state, would be
considered contraband and subject to confiscation. No vehicle shall be destroyed in a
controlled burn to remove the vehicle as an obstruction."
6. The statute allows for the controlled burn of a vehicle that has more than 15 firearms.
7. The State, acting under 9 R. Stat. § 342.201 et seq., burned (i.e., destroyed via explosion)
Plaintiff thr33six8's brown Gridlock for having 1 Komrad and 25 Solamis, his black
Gridlock for having Para 17s, and Plaintiff NamaeNashi's blue Gridlock for having 13
boxes of .45 ACP.
8. Plaintiff thr33six8 had a RFLID during the execution of the search warrant, but
NamaeNashi did not have a RFLID during the execution of the search warrant.
9. Plaintiffs argue that the burns, in general, violated their R. Const. Art. Ⅰ § Ⅴ right "to be
protected in the enjoyment of life, liberty, and property" because it involved the
destruction of non-contraband property, which is property that Plaintiffs have the right to
enjoy and therefore keep under any and all circumstances.
10. Aditionally, Plaintiffs reject the belief that a vehicle containing more than 15 firearms is
"subject to confiscation by the state" because Plaintiffs have "a right to bear arms for the
defense of themselves and [of] the State." R. Const. Art. Ⅰ § Ⅻ. It is common, after all,
for Ridgewayans to store (aka "stash") their firearms in vehicles. This tradition has
streched as far back as New Haven County.
11. Since 9 R. Stat. §§ 342.201, 342.203 (hereinafter "the burn statutes") impeded Plaintiffs'
R. Const. Art. Ⅰ § Ⅴ rights when the State, acting under the burn statutes, burned
Plaintiffs' Gridlocks, the State is liable for this tort.
(2) Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
(The Torts And Civil Procedure Act of 2026 § 205(c)/7 R. Stat. § 121.403)
12. Plaintiffs incorporate the facts from the statement of facts.
13. Plaintiffs also incorporate their pleadings for the tort of Impedance of Civil Rights.
14. Plaintiffs allege that both the Ridgeway County Sheriff's Office as well as the State of
Ridgeway are tortfeasors of this tort.
15. Since burnings go against Plaintiffs' rights, the defendants, acting under the burn statutes,
committed such burnings against the Plaintiffs, the defendants have committed this tort.
16. Therefore, the defendants have committed this tort as they have violated Plaintiff
NamaeNashi's rights.
(3) Official Misconduct
(The Torts And Civil Procedure Act of 2026 § 205(d)/7 R. Stat. § 121.404)
17. Plaintiffs incorporate the facts from the statement of facts.
18. Plaintiffs also incorporate the pleadings from Impedance of Civil Rights and Deprivation
of Rights under Color of Law.
19. Plaintiffs allege both defendants as tortfeasors of this tort.
20. Everyone who has gotten a burn permit is aware of the Fire Marshal's guidelines on
controlled burns, which mirrors the burn statutes.
21. Since they mirror the burn statutes, knowledge of the Fire Marshal's guidelines on
controlled burns is the same as knowing the burn statutes.
22. Since the deputies who did the controlled burns on Plaintff's Gridlocks had burn permits,
they were aware of the guidelines and therefore aware of the burn statutes.
23. Since such controlled burns were out of their office as they were illegal, the defendants
have committed this tort.
RELIEF
For Impedance of Civil Rights
24. Plaintiffs request an injunction enjoining the State of Ridgeway, which is a defendant of
this civil action, from enforcing The Incorporation of Ridgeway County Act of 2026 §
409/9 R. Stat. §§ 342.201, 342.203.
For Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law
25. Plaintiffs request an injunction enjoining the State of Ridgeway, which is a defendant of
this civil action, from enforcing The Incorporation of Ridgeway County Act of 2026 §
409/9 R. Stat. §§ 342.201, 342.202, 342.203.
For Official Misconduct
1. Plaintiffs request $10,000 in punitive damages from each Defendant.
2. Plaintiffs request an injunction enjoining the State of Ridgeway from conducting
controlled burns on vehicles during search warrants.
DATED: 2026-07-24
Respectfully submitted,
———————————————
thr33six8
Plaintiff
/s/ thr33six8
———————————————
NamaeNashi
Plaintiff who is under a pseudonym
/s/ NamaeNashi
