1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PAGE - 1 -
Declaration of Counsel
TonyBlony492, RBN 19309
Filing username: TonyBlony492
Counsel for: Plaintiff
SUPERIOR COURT OF RIDGEWAY
COUNTY OF RIDGEWAY
COUNTY OF RIDGEWAY
thr33six8, Case No. RSC-CV-8427
Plaintiff,
vs. Declaration of Counsel
AlbertWellesley,et.al.,
Defendant.
Declarant
I, TonyBlony492, am counsel for the Plaintiff in this action. I have personal
knowledge of the court filings, service history, and applicable statutes in this matter, and
if called to testify, I could and would competently testify as follows
Declaration
I, TonyBlony492, hereby declare that I have dilligently gone through the Motion to
Dismiss, Complaint, Rules of proffesional Conduct, searched the State codes database,
etc., I have found multiple discrepencies between the Motion to Dismiss and the reality
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PAGE - 2 -
Declaration of Counsel
and I will submit an exhibition list with all of the evidence available to back up my
findings.
1. The following are my findings:
2. In section II, Argument A, paragraph 2. ...already before
3. the Bar (Disclosures Ex. 3; Suppl. Decl. Ex. 14), independently... In the
part regarding The disclosures, there is wirtten ‘‘ Suppl. Decl. Ex. 14’’.
However, in the original Complaint, there is no Exhibit 14, the whole
complaint contains only 13 exhibits.
4. The second interesting thing is the following: ...five distinct charges under
3 R. Stat. § 411.101 and Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1, 3.1, 1.4, and
1.6... If we take a closer look, 3. R. Stat. § 411.101 does NOT exist in the
state database.
5. If we look once more at the rules of proffesional conduct, this is also
interesting. Specifically, rule 1.1 is specifically talking about the
competence of an attorney to represent a client,
6. Rule 3.1 is talking about meritorious claims and contentions,
7. Rule 1.4 is talking about the way of proper communication between an
attorney and a client and
8. Rule 1.6 is talking about the Extent of Confidential Information between an
Attorney and a Client, none of which are relevant to the case nor to the
motion to dismiss.
The following are my findings: In section II, Argument A, paragraph 2. ...already
before the Bar (Disclosures Ex. 3; Suppl. Decl. Ex. 14), independently... In the part
regarding The disclosures, there is wirtten ‘‘ Suppl. Decl. Ex. 14’’. However, in the
original Complaint, there is no Exhibit 14, the whole complaint contains only 13 exhibits.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PAGE - 3 -
Declaration of Counsel
The second interesting thing is the following: ...five distinct charges under 3 R. Stat. §
411.101 and Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1, 3.1, 1.4, and 1.6... If we take a closer
look, 3. R. Stat. § 411.101 does NOT exist in the state database.
If we look once more at the rules of proffesional conduct, this is also interesting.
Specifically, rule 1.1 is specifically talking about the competence of an attorney to
represent a client, Rule 3.1 is talking about meritorious claims and contentions, Rule 1.4
is talking about the way of proper communication between an attorney and a client and
Rule 1.6 is talking about the Extent of Confidential Information between an Attorney and
a Client, none of which are relevant to the case nor to the motion to dismiss.
Verification
I, TonyBlony492, hereby under the penalty of perjury declare that everything I
have just said contains the truth, only the truth and nothing but the truth.
