Ridgeway Unified Courts

JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF RIDGEWAY

Searchable full text

22,787 characters extracted

—

OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS Superior Court of the State of Ridgeway Category: Courtroom 301 #tripiafer23-v-je9se Archive Window: Jul 28, 2026, 05:33:12 AM UTC – Aug 21, 2026, 10:39:21 AM UTC Total Messages: 116 Timezone: UTC Message Log [0001] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 28, 2026, 05:33:12 AM UTC Embedded content: Case: RSC-CV-8563 Tripiafer23 v. JE9SE Plaintiff(s): tripiafer23 Defendant(s): JE9SE Type: CIVIL Court: SUPERIOR Status: ACTIVE Presiding Judge: Unassigned Case Link: [View on RW Courts](https://rwcourts.org/case-details/RSC-CV-8563) RW Courts • live case record [0002] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 28, 2026, 05:33:14 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-8563 Filing Code: COMPLAINT Bates Number: BATES-20260728-7027066075 RW Courts • live docket update [0003] split75th — Jul 28, 2026, 05:37:06 AM UTC <@523543155732381716> file noa at your earliest convenience [0004] split75th — Jul 28, 2026, 05:37:10 AM UTC complaint is accepted [0005] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 28, 2026, 05:44:48 AM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-8563 Status: PENDING Total Cents: $0.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0006] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 28, 2026, 05:45:09 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-8563 Filing Code: NOTICE_OF_APPEARANCE Bates Number: BATES-20260728-7478909306 RW Courts • live docket update [0007] split75th — Jul 28, 2026, 05:45:49 AM UTC beautiful, you can type here correct [0008] split75th — Jul 28, 2026, 05:49:33 AM UTC <@162074259835846656> can you please add <@523543155732381716> to this channel your honor [0009] thr33tr33s — Jul 28, 2026, 06:27:47 AM UTC I am now able to speak in this channel after running the /noa command. [0010] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 28, 2026, 06:41:42 AM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-8563 Status: PENDING Total Cents: $0.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0011] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 28, 2026, 06:41:44 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-8563 Filing Code: CIVIL_SUMMONS Bates Number: BATES-20260728-6392841890 RW Courts • live docket update [0012] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 28, 2026, 06:46:42 AM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-8563 Status: PENDING Total Cents: $0.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0013] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 28, 2026, 06:46:43 AM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-8563 Filing Code: PROOF_OF_SERVICE Bates Number: BATES-20260728-2157496870 RW Courts • live docket update [0014] thr33tr33s — Jul 28, 2026, 06:47:45 AM UTC For the record, here is my proof of Defendant JE9SE's service pursuant to [Rid. Rule Civ. Proc. 4](https:// docs.google.com/document/d/1sT_qNGDgB_8Uy-IBsGzbMGgc03B4ry45kDhYp7Y0YGA/edit? tab=t.0#heading=h.wsszfbh611i5)(c) ("An attorney may deliver service of process exclusively by manner of messaging, to be demonstrated before a judge in photograph, GIF, or video manner.") Embedded content: Ridgeway Rules of Civil Procedure STATE OF RIDGEWAY RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE ... Attachments: je9se_proof_of_service.gif — https://cdn.discordapp.com/ attachments/1531534970248626242/1531553738433630408/je9se_proof_of_service.gif? ex=6a967512&is=6a952392&hm=10798f28460d7b832598f6cc3af42e3fe2e2f867bc4b825bd1b3f7adafc6c965& [0015] thr33tr33s — Jul 28, 2026, 06:48:45 AM UTC He has until <t:1785652920:s> to file an answer. [0016] thr33tr33s — Jul 28, 2026, 01:48:21 PM UTC <@1463388891578110086> Your honor, the defendant JE9SE has joined this Discord server but he cannot send messages. [0017] je9se — Jul 28, 2026, 01:57:26 PM UTC Hello, I'm going to fight this but I'm waiting on results from the owners based around this situation [0018] split75th — Jul 28, 2026, 02:35:11 PM UTC Thank you for notifying of this, and i do appreciate you making appearance in a timely manner [0019] je9se — Jul 28, 2026, 02:39:59 PM UTC I was told it may be getting dropped by the plaintiff so I don't know what's really going on [0020] split75th — Jul 28, 2026, 02:44:35 PM UTC What i can do is advise you of the civil procedures, if you’re not aware, you do have until the above stated time since service to file an answer to the complaint, among other things that may come of it Please notify me here if there are any changes that i need to know of, discussions to settle, or anything of those affects Thank you [0021] je9se — Jul 28, 2026, 02:45:11 PM UTC Of course, will do [0022] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 28, 2026, 04:44:11 PM UTC Embedded content: NOTICE OF APPEARANCE An attorney has filed a Notice of Appearance in this case. Attorney: <@622791808329580564> Appearing on behalf of: JE9SE (Defendant) Filed at: <t:1785257051:F> Entered on the court docket (BATES-20260728-0114466899) [0023] funnypoliceman — Jul 28, 2026, 04:44:29 PM UTC Dr. RebelPilot09, SJD Esq., appearing on behalf of the defendant JE9SE Esq. [0024] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 28, 2026, 04:44:30 PM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-8563 Status: PENDING Total Cents: $0.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0025] caseHAWK (BOT) — Jul 28, 2026, 04:44:31 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-8563 Filing Code: NOTICE_OF_APPEARANCE Bates Number: BATES-20260728-0114466899 RW Courts • live docket update [0026] funnypoliceman — Jul 28, 2026, 04:45:17 PM UTC <@208470937752829953> [0027] split75th — Jul 28, 2026, 04:49:43 PM UTC Thanks counsel, do you *happen* to have an answer to the complaint prepared? If not no worries just inquiring [0028] funnypoliceman — Jul 28, 2026, 04:50:52 PM UTC No, I don't. I've only just been appointed counsel for the defendant. My forte is Clark law, so I'm currently just making sure my knowledge of this jurisdiction's legal system is up-to-date, in preparation for a response to be written. [0029] split75th — Jul 28, 2026, 04:51:23 PM UTC Ok no worries [0030] funnypoliceman — Jul 28, 2026, 04:51:38 PM UTC For the record, back in my primary jurisdiction, official capacity cases are defended by the state. Is this the same here? [0031] split75th — Jul 28, 2026, 04:54:47 PM UTC Actually on this note now that youve mentioned this, I'll refer this to the Clerk <@1069415674356715560> to assign to a real Judge - I cannot be presiding to a case of this nature [0032] funnypoliceman — Jul 28, 2026, 04:56:54 PM UTC Would you mind answering the above question please, Your Honor? Just so I can ensure my response is proper, and that my appearance for the defendant is proper as well. [0033] split75th — Jul 28, 2026, 04:57:30 PM UTC Right absolutely, sorry I entirely overlooked that [0034] funnypoliceman — Jul 28, 2026, 04:57:42 PM UTC (In clark, the state's appearance in official capacity is a **statutory requirement** unless they decline to represent, in which the official capacity case defaults in favour of the Plaintiff) [0035] split75th — Jul 28, 2026, 05:01:03 PM UTC In regards to your question, 7 R. Stat. § 122.004 does affirm that *proceedings against an individual in their official capacity as an agent of the government shall be construed as cases against the government* The SG may of course refuse to defend IAW 7 R. Stat. § 122.008 [0036] funnypoliceman — Jul 28, 2026, 05:05:55 PM UTC Does the Solicitor General's refusal to represent lead to a default in their official capacity, as is the case in my jurisdiction of primary practise? [0037] split75th — Jul 28, 2026, 05:08:13 PM UTC If the Solicitor General refuses to defend an agent of the government, and the torts are alleged under *7 R. Stat. § 122.101*, the Solicitor General shall provide the relief as requested within the bounds of state statute and the constitution and that the courts shall dismiss with prejudice **all claims** in which the Solicitor General refuses to defend an agent of the government and provides relief as requested within state statute and the constitution. [0038] funnypoliceman — Jul 28, 2026, 05:08:57 PM UTC Alright, thanks for clearing up and providing specific citations too. Very helpful. [0039] funnypoliceman — Jul 28, 2026, 05:09:11 PM UTC I'll return with a response before the default deadline. [0040] split75th — Jul 28, 2026, 05:09:35 PM UTC Amazing thanks counsel [0041] thr33tr33s — Jul 29, 2026, 12:17:55 AM UTC Pending a state bar investigation for allegedly committing crimes violating Rule of Professional Conduct 8.3(b) (because apparently robbing an ATM in this game is a "crime of dishonesty"), I must inform this court that my license has been put on an internim suspension. cc: <@576922717320904714> <@1463388891578110086> <@208470937752829953> <@622791808329580564> [0042] split75th — Jul 29, 2026, 04:21:37 AM UTC Thanks for notice [0043] thr33tr33s — Jul 29, 2026, 03:26:26 PM UTC I am no longer suspended to practice law since 8:46 (UTC+0:00). [0044] thr33tr33s — Jul 29, 2026, 03:26:51 PM UTC cc: <@576922717320904714> <@1463388891578110086> <@622791808329580564> <@208470937752829953> [0045] funnypoliceman — Jul 29, 2026, 03:44:03 PM UTC Community Management have provided the defendant with immunity as it pertains to his videos. As the plaintiff's exhibits of evidence originate from his videos, and the alleged events that transpired in the Statement of Facts were in his video, he is afforded immunity. Would the court prefer a paper motion for dismissal on this basis or will the court accept this oral argument? Attachments: image.png — https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1531534970248626242/1532051087199047760/image.png? ex=6a964a03&is=6a94f883&hm=4b5924a938e9f31f28063f0597cd9b974b104f4ec31bb9783d8247e4bd73a1a7& [0046] funnypoliceman — Jul 29, 2026, 03:44:25 PM UTC cc: <@475509261993115658> [0047] funnypoliceman — Jul 29, 2026, 03:44:31 PM UTC <@1463388891578110086> [0048] funnypoliceman — Jul 29, 2026, 03:44:33 PM UTC <@208470937752829953> [0049] funnypoliceman — Jul 29, 2026, 03:44:36 PM UTC <@523543155732381716> [0050] split75th — Jul 29, 2026, 03:47:21 PM UTC Thanks counsel, I ask this is submitted papered for proper record keeping and transactions please and thank you [0051] thr33tr33s — Jul 29, 2026, 03:47:51 PM UTC <@1463388891578110086> Your honor, I do not believe that this is grounds for a dismissal. I may also use other forms of evidence (i.e., witness statements, depositions, interrogatories, etc.) to prove my claims. [0052] thr33tr33s — Jul 29, 2026, 03:48:22 PM UTC At most, this is a case of nepotism striking Defendant's video, however I do not believe that nepotism will save Defendant from civil liability. [0053] funnypoliceman — Jul 29, 2026, 03:51:45 PM UTC If it pleases the court, I'd like to go back to the defendant's apparent misunderstanding concerning immunity. The video isn't stricken, the defendant is just afforded total immunity by a body with total authority to issue such immunity. Thusly, an mtd will be filed in due course. [0054] funnypoliceman — Jul 29, 2026, 04:27:46 PM UTC How might the court wish our pleading to be formatted? Bearing in mind that this is a matter of community oversight preventing the Plaintiff's suit, rather than of an instance in which a motion to dismiss would be suitable or a motion for summary judgement? [0055] funnypoliceman — Jul 29, 2026, 04:28:41 PM UTC No grounds under the Ridgeway Civ Procedure exists for an MTD in this instance. Summary Judgement could be acceptable? At the end of the day, this is just moderation stepping in to protect the defendant, which overrides the authority of the court. [0056] funnypoliceman — Jul 29, 2026, 04:28:45 PM UTC :/ [0057] split75th — Jul 29, 2026, 04:29:32 PM UTC Right I was just reviewing that [0058] split75th — Jul 29, 2026, 04:31:20 PM UTC Of course, I am just a Magistrate so I will not be taking this case to the end, however; I would say that either or is sufficient. A motion to dismiss is most often seen prior to discovery, so that may suffice, otherwise moving for summary judgement could also suffice. I, again, am not the final say and I personally have ***never*** experienced a management involvement in judicial proceedings in any community, so I am just wanting to do things as procedurally accurate as possible regardless... if this make sense [0059] split75th — Jul 29, 2026, 04:32:22 PM UTC I'll confer with the Superior Court Judge directly supervisory to myself, and will update any information I may receive that is beneficial to all parties here as well [0060] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 1, 2026, 02:55:28 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-8563 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260728-0114466899 RW Courts • live docket update [0061] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 1, 2026, 02:55:56 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-8563 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260728-2157496870 RW Courts • live docket update [0062] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 1, 2026, 02:56:26 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-8563 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260728-6392841890 RW Courts • live docket update [0063] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 1, 2026, 02:56:44 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-8563 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260728-7478909306 RW Courts • live docket update [0064] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 1, 2026, 02:56:48 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-8563 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260728-7027066075 RW Courts • live docket update [0065] funnypoliceman — Aug 1, 2026, 08:41:37 PM UTC any word your honor? [0066] funnypoliceman — Aug 1, 2026, 08:45:06 PM UTC <@475509261993115658> would you mind confirming to this court that je9se is afforded immunity when making videos, as he was in this instance [0067] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 1, 2026, 11:22:42 PM UTC Embedded content: Case Docketed • RSC-CV-8563 Score: 0.3099614236111111 Method: AUTO_TIE_DRAW Reason: → AlbertWellesley · fill 0.31 · blind draw among 2 tied RW Courts • live docket update [0068] split75th — Aug 2, 2026, 08:16:58 AM UTC Hello counsel, I apologize for the delay on these proceedings - I am still awaiting confirmation myself, but this is now docketed to <@162074259835846656> and he may have a more straightforward answer for you, that I do not have. [0069] funnypoliceman — Aug 2, 2026, 08:39:35 PM UTC <@162074259835846656> Hello your honor, congrats on your promotion from magistrate to full judge here in Ridgeway, any chance you may comment on this question of immunity as it applies to the defendant? [0070] funnypoliceman — Aug 2, 2026, 08:39:40 PM UTC re. [0071] kezzera — Aug 5, 2026, 09:15:26 AM UTC Good morning all [0072] kezzera — Aug 5, 2026, 09:18:24 AM UTC <@622791808329580564> <@523543155732381716> <@208470937752829953> Upon discussion with <@475509261993115658> it is currently my belief that immunity will attach on condition that the video has been produced and uploaded (as evidence of his qualifying activities) [0073] kezzera — Aug 5, 2026, 09:18:45 AM UTC and because it has, this may likely not proceed [0074] kezzera — Aug 5, 2026, 09:19:03 AM UTC I'll seek further clarification to be sure but this is what I know about this situation [0075] kezzera — Aug 5, 2026, 09:19:33 AM UTC <@523543155732381716> Compliments made regarding the filing - it's rather complete [0076] funnypoliceman — Aug 5, 2026, 11:59:43 PM UTC It would be more ideal if Mr. Syntax could be more explicit with immunity guidelines, although as of now the current status quo is ideal for my client. How would this court prefer I act based on this immunity? MTD doesn't really apply and an MSJ seems improper as well. [0077] kezzera — Aug 7, 2026, 04:39:17 PM UTC I might just sua sponte this really [0078] funnypoliceman — Aug 7, 2026, 06:26:07 PM UTC that'd be a lot better (and easier). much appreciated [0079] thr33tr33s — Aug 8, 2026, 04:16:50 PM UTC I plan on filing an objection. [0080] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 8, 2026, 07:17:04 PM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-8563 Status: PAID Total Cents: $0.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0081] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 8, 2026, 07:17:06 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-8563 Filing Code: OTHER Bates Number: BATES-20260808-2662405252 RW Courts • live docket update [0082] thr33tr33s — Aug 8, 2026, 07:18:07 PM UTC Application for entry of default. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yVOmmtjtrRxHa9zqEsd74tuT0WTppcOo cc: <@1069415674356715560> Embedded content: Tripiafer23 v. JE9SE (RSC-CV-8563) application for entry of default... [0083] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 8, 2026, 07:19:05 PM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-8563 Status: PENDING Total Cents: $60.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0084] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 8, 2026, 07:19:26 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-8563 Filing Code: MOTION Bates Number: BATES-20260808-1785579476 RW Courts • live docket update [0085] thr33tr33s — Aug 8, 2026, 07:21:12 PM UTC Motion for recusal. https://drive.google.com/file/d/16tg8pC8qnO2ZWNR8NjR2870-JRIqAzT- cc: <@622791808329580564> <@208470937752829953> (pinging for Rid. Rule Civ. Proc. 5.1 service) Embedded content: Tripiafer23 v. JE9SE (RSC-CV-8563) motion for recusal of presiding ... [0086] thr33tr33s — Aug 8, 2026, 07:21:58 PM UTC <@162074259835846656> Your honor, you are not a party to this civil action, but I should inform you of the motion for recusal. [0087] funnypoliceman — Aug 8, 2026, 07:29:23 PM UTC this is beyond motion for recusal. association through development isn't a conflict. syntax isnt a party, he's the orator for the development/community management team, and the immunity offered is beyond the scope of standard immunity, it's as if you're trying to get a judge to recuse himself because he's christian and god offered a defendant immunity. [0088] funnypoliceman — Aug 8, 2026, 07:29:36 PM UTC (hyperbolic comparison, sure, but its valid none the less) [0089] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 08:26:46 PM UTC I cannot disclose any terms related to my work with SDI whatsoever [0090] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 08:27:10 PM UTC but Syntax and I do not belong to the same section nor am I in any position to tell him what to do about his own community [0091] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 08:29:41 PM UTC This is a ridiculous motion [0092] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 08:32:01 PM UTC You do understand that this immunity is not something the Court has decided but DO? [0093] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 08:32:18 PM UTC No judge here is going to overrule that on pain of complete destruction [0094] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 08:32:27 PM UTC Get a grip, it's a done deal [0095] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 08:34:00 PM UTC Absolutely not, this motion is denied [0096] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 08:34:17 PM UTC You have failed to understand the outcome of this case [0097] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 08:34:23 PM UTC I'll put it very simply for you [0098] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 08:34:38 PM UTC God stopped this from continuing [0099] thr33tr33s — Aug 8, 2026, 08:43:16 PM UTC Your honor, previous precedent in this court asks that the motion be ruled on by another, unrelated justice. See, e.g., *thr33six8* v. *spoookdan*, Rid. Superior Ct. RSC-CV-6074 (2026) (another judge was brought in to rule on plaintiff's motion for recusal). I do not see why a judge who is the target of a motion for recusal may rule on their own motion for recusal because it is clear to me that you have a stake in *staying* as the presiding judge here. [0100] thr33tr33s — Aug 8, 2026, 08:44:32 PM UTC If a judge has an interest as intense as yours in staying as the judge who will rule on this issue, then how could one possibly be in the position of neutrality per *Larkin*? [0101] thr33tr33s — Aug 8, 2026, 08:47:15 PM UTC Correction: "judge" in place of "justice" at the beginning. [0102] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 08:47:17 PM UTC You fail to understand that this case was dead in the waters when DO said defendant has immunity [0103] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 08:47:29 PM UTC I cannot do anything about it [0104] kezzera — Aug 8, 2026, 08:48:13 PM UTC A new judge will not say anything differently on pain of causing a shitstorm [0105] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 8, 2026, 09:23:26 PM UTC Embedded content: Fee Assessed • RSC-CV-8563 Status: PAID Total Cents: $0.00 RW Courts • live docket update [0106] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 8, 2026, 09:23:28 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Submitted • RSC-CV-8563 Filing Code: OTHER Bates Number: BATES-20260808-4141524620 RW Courts • live docket update [0107] thr33tr33s — Aug 8, 2026, 09:23:47 PM UTC Request for entry of judgment. https://drive.google.com/file/d/116M7ppyzQ1_hUMhFv4t5Dd2R-qQWnHgw Embedded content: Tripiafer23 v. JE9SE (RSC-CV-8563) request for entry of judgment.pdf [0108] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 8, 2026, 11:38:08 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-8563 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260808-2662405252 RW Courts • live docket update [0109] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 8, 2026, 11:38:12 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-8563 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260808-1785579476 RW Courts • live docket update [0110] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 8, 2026, 11:38:15 PM UTC Embedded content: Motion Accepted — Briefing Clock Running **Motion** (`BATES-20260808-1785579476`) Opposition due <t:1786405075:F> (<t:1786405075:R>) — 48 hours after service (Rule 7.1(4)). Failure to respond within the period is deemed a waiver of opposition (Rule 7.1(9)). A reply is due within 24 hours after any opposition is served (Rule 7.1(5)). Periods run continuously in UTC (Rule 7.1(8)); anchor: clerk acceptance per the docket event [0111] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 8, 2026, 11:38:32 PM UTC Embedded content: Filing Accepted • RSC-CV-8563 Status: ACCEPTED Bates Number: BATES-20260808-4141524620 RW Courts • live docket update [0112] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 9, 2026, 09:00:49 AM UTC Embedded content: Order Issued • RSC-CV-8563 Type: MOTION_RULING Title: Memorandum Opinion and Order: Motion for Recusal RW Courts • live docket update [0113] caseHAWK (BOT) — Aug 9, 2026, 09:00:53 AM UTC Order issued on **RSC-CV-8563**: Memorandum Opinion and Order: Motion for Recusal Attachments: order_RSC-CV-8563.pdf — https://cdn.discordapp.com/ attachments/1531534970248626242/1535935893968396289/order_RSC-CV-8563.pdf? ex=6a969445&is=6a9542c5&hm=57cd123eccd705d0be7b64ef3131b7cf18976f8e2f29b0af976d7b743550e6ee& [0114] thr33tr33s — Aug 10, 2026, 08:33:52 PM UTC Pending an investigation by the Ridgeway State Bar, I have been told that "the Board has determined that you pose a risk to the public if your license remains active during the investigation and will therefore impose an interim suspension against your license until the investigation concludes." [0115] thr33tr33s — Aug 10, 2026, 08:34:15 PM UTC While I was about to file a notice of voluntary dismissal, I cannot continue representation here due to the interim suspension. [0116] kezzera — Aug 21, 2026, 10:39:21 AM UTC This is now subject to dismissal Automatically generated by CaseHawk. This is a true and accurate transcript of the proceedings as recorded in the specified Discord channel.

transcript_tripiafer23-v-je9se_2026-08-31.pdf

Original document

Searchable full text

Document record