IN THE SUPERIOR COURT
OF THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
VDIMEUH,
Petitioner,
v.
ERRCORE, in his official capacity as a Sergeant
of the Ridgeway County Sheriff's Office,
Respondent.
Case No. RSC-CV-3564
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hon. Judge Unassigned
Petitioner vDimeuh, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby requests this court to issue
relief consistent with habeas remedies under law. Habeas corpus proceedings are governed and
recognized pursuant to Rid. R. Civ. P. 54(a)(1)(1), and 1 R. Stat. § 2210-2213.
PARTIES
1. Petitioner vDimeuh is a citizen of the State of Ridgeway.
2. Respondent errcore is a Sergeant within the Ridgeway County Sheriff’s Office and a citizen of the
State of Ridgeway.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
3. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to Article V, Section IV of the Constitution of the State of
Ridgeway, supplemented by 1 R. Stat. § 2210, which authorizes the Superior Court of the State of
Ridgeway to hear petitions for habeas corpus.
4. Venue is correct as the actions in question occurred in the geographic boundaries of the City of
Sterling Heights, within the State of Ridgeway.
CUSTODY
5. Petitioner was held in the custody of Ridgeway County Corrections on January 18th, 2025.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
6. On January 18th, 2025, vDimeuh entered the City of Sterling Heights, shortly thereafter getting
his vehicle jammed in a group of vehicles outside of the Ridgeway County Sheriff’s Office
substation.
1
7. vDimeuh exited his vehicle, intending to address an individual for hitting his vehicle, along with
reporting the collision to Sergeant errcore, who was nearby.
8. As vDimeuh returned to his vehicle, he briefly entered the vehicle of Sergeant errcore, which was
positioned directly next to his own vehicle, before jumping out of the vehicle.
9. vDimeuh was placed into handcuffs by Sergeant errcore, and shortly thereafter arrested by
Sergeant errcore and held in the custody of Ridgeway County Corrections, for the charge of
attempting to commit a crime - specifically, government vehicle theft.
10. Attempting to commit a crime is defined as “the act of abandoning the commission of the crime
after taking steps to commit it, or failing to complete the crime after taking steps to commit it” in
the Ridgeway State Database. R.C.C. § 6.01.
11. Government vehicle theft is defined as “the act of taking a county official’s or peace officer's
vehicle without the permission of their government agency” in the Ridgeway State Database.
R.C.C. § 7.25.
12. To “take” is defined as “to obtain possession or control, whether legally or illegally.” TAKE,
Black's Law Dictionary (12th ed. 2024).
CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
13. The statements contained in paragraphs 1 through 12 of this Petition are incorporated by
reference as if fully set forth herein.
14. Pursuant to 1 R. Stat. § 2210, an individual may petition this court for habeas relief. Section 2210
creates a special “cause of action” for habeas proceedings.
15. In reviewing habeas petitions, this Court must first determine “whether the police were legally
entitled to make [an] arrest.” See In re ZachCasisbeast, 1 R. Supp. 12 (2022). Indeed, If the arrest
was not lawful at the outset, “the inquiry ends there; the record must be removed.” Id.
16. Petitioner contests that having taken no steps towards taking the vehicle, and with Respondent
having no cause at the time of arrest to believe that Petitioner had taken any steps to take the
vehicle, the arrest was unlawful at its outset. Respondent had no probable cause to believe the
Petitioner committed the crime described in the arrest record.
17. As a result of the unlawfulness of the arrest of the Petitioner, the charge must be vacated and the
record must be removed.
18. In the event the arrest may be determined lawful at its outset, the Court must move to the next
line of inquiry for its review of this petition; being “whether the petitioner is actually innocent.”
In re ZachCasisbeast, 1 R. Supp. 12 (2022).
2
19. The petitioner’s actual innocence may be determined “by establishing facts that make the
prospect of a hypothetical conviction on the charges virtually impossible,” specifically showing
that “a reasonable and well-informed jury could not convict the petitioner in a hypothetical trial if
they were aware of those facts, and those facts were admissible evidence.” Id.
20. Given the facts established in paragraphs 1 through 12 of this petition, similarly supported at trial
by the testimony of the Petitioner, a reasonable and well-informed jury could not convict the
petitioner.
21. As a result of the Petitioner’s actual innocence, the charge must be vacated and the record must be
removed.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully prays the court for relief as follows:
22. Issue a permanent injunction ordering immediate reversal and vacatur of the criminal record with
ID 202511876a76ecaa.
DATED: January 20, 2025 Respectfully submitted,
Robin5D
R. Bar No. 28105
D: checkraisefold
Counsel of Record
3
