In the Superior Court of
the State of Ridgeway
Robin5D, HERECOMESTHEFBI,
kenneytube, NinjazAwesomes,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
Impediage, in their official capacity as a Law
Enforcement Training Center Admissions Of
ficer, drjack0, in their official capacity as Di
rector of the Law Enforcement Training Cen
ter,
Defendant(s).
Case No. RSCCV3435
Complaint in a Civil Action
Hon. Judge t1dtony
Plaintiff Robin5D, in pro per, and representing HERECOMESTHEFBI, kenneytube, and Nin
jazAwesomes pro bono (hereinafter jointly as Plaintiffs), alleges, for their complaint against the
defendants, as follows:
PARTIES
1. Plaintiff Robin5D is a resident of the State of Ridgeway.
2. Plaintiff HERECOMESTHEFBI is a resident of the State of Ridgeway.
3. Plaintiff kenneytube is a resident of the State of Ridgeway.
4. Plaintiff NinjazAwesomes is a resident of the State of Ridgeway.
5. Defendant Impediage is a resident of the State of Ridgeway, and at the time of the alleged
acts was an Admissions Officer of the Law Enforcement Training Center (hereinafter LETC),
belonging to the Admissions Investigations suboffice.
6. Defendant drjack0 is a resident of the State of Ridgeway, and the Director of the Law En
forcement Training Center as appointed by Developer Oversight.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
7. Plaintiffs invoke the jurisdiction of the Superior Court contained in Article V, Section IV of
the state Constitution, giving jurisdiction for “all civil or criminal cases.”
8. Venue is proper as the conduct involved took place within Ridgeway County, State of Ridge
way.
ESSENTIAL FACTS
9. On or around July 20th, 2024, Plaintiffs applied for entry into the Law Enforcement Training
Center’s (hereinafter LETC) training program; specifically, Class 14.
1
10. By July 24th, 2024, Plaintiffs “primary screenings” and application reviews had been accepted
by the Admissions Office of the LETC. However, on or around that date, Plaintiffs “applicant
screenings” were denied.
11. The “applicant screening” phase of LETC’s admissions process does not publicly or privately
disclose reasons for denial at this stage, nor are the results appealable or correctable by LETC
personnel.
12. The intended purpose of this phase is to filter out aternative accounts and other bad actors.
13. Defendant Impediage denied all of Plaintiffs “applicant screenings,” as identified by com
ments on the public LETC Database Google Sheet.
14. Shortly afterwards, Impediage was fired and blacklisted from employment at LETC with a
reason of “Account Trafficking in LETC & Attempts to defraud LETC Command” according
to the public LETC Database Google Sheet.
15. Impediage, following his termination at LETC, publicly disclosed the denial reason of HERE
COMESTHEFBI in the State of Ridgeway Discord server, that being “Drjack ordered his
denial.” Within the following minutes, Impediage deleted his messages.
16. Following the denials, Plaintiff Robin5D submitted a Freedom of Information request seek
ing the denial reason of his screening to LETC, which was illegally declined. Plaintiff forced
the appointment of a Freedom of Information Officer by filing suit.
17. Following the aforementioned appointment, Robin5D’s request was responded to, giving him
a denial reason of him being a “suspected alt account.”
18. Plaintiff kenneytube, given the context that LETC was now responsive to requests for back
ground check denial reasons, requested his own denial reason by sending a message through
Discord direct messaging to Defendant drjack0.
19. drjack0 responded to kenneytube’s direct message by stating “You were denied for being on
a watchlist. I can not give you more than that.”
I. ROBIN5D’S ROBLOX ACCOUNT IS PLAINLY NOT AN ALT AND HIS BACK
GROUND IS OTHERWISE CLEAR
20. Robin5D’s ROBLOX account was created over 12 years ago, on December 4th, 2011.
21. Robin5D currently holds, and at the time of the screening held an active certificate licensing
him to practice law in the State of Ridgeway from the Ridgeway State Bar.
22. Robin5D currently holds, and at the time of the screening held, employment in the Ridge
way Parks Service as a Volunteer Park Ranger since the date of May 15th, 2024, along with
holding employment in the Ridgeway Superior Court as a clerk for Judge notsfeelings.
23. Employment in the Ridgeway Parks Service requires a background check from the Ridge
way State Police’s State Bureau of Investigations, which Robin5D passed as a requirement
of his employment.
24. Robin5D’s ROBLOX profile currently shows, and at the time of the screening approximately
showed, that he has 200 friends, 2 pages of created games, 25,000 place visits, 70 pages of
favorited games, 6 pages of groups, along with many pages of badges and owned inventory
items.
2
25. Robin5D has no criminal record or citations, and did not have any at the time of the screen
ing.
II. HERECOMESTHEFBI’S ROBLOX ACCOUNT IS PLAINLY NOT AN ALT AND HIS
BACKGROUND IS OTHERWISE CLEAR
26. HERECOMESTHEFBI’s ROBLOX account was created over 5 years ago, on December
28th, 2018.
27. HERECOMESTHEFBI currently holds, and at the time of the screening held, employment
in the Ridgeway Parks Service since the date of May 15th, 2024, as a Volunteer Park Ranger.
28. Employment in the Ridgeway Parks Service requires a background check from the Ridge
way State Police’s State Bureau of Investigations, which HERECOMESTHEFBI passed as
a requirement of his employment.
29. HERECOMESTHEFBI’s ROBLOX profile currently shows, and at the time of the screen
ing approximately showed, that he has 122 friends, 12 pages of favorited games, 5 pages of
groups, along with many pages of badges and owned inventory items.
30. HERECOMESTHEFBI has no criminal record or citations, and did not have any at the time
of the background screening.
III. KENNEYTUBE’S ROBLOX ACCOUNT IS PLAINLY NOT AN ALT AND HIS BACK
GROUND IS OTHERWISE CLEAR
31. kenneytube’s ROBLOX account was created over 7 years ago, on January 3rd, 2017.
32. kenneytube currently holds, and at the time of the screening held, employment in the Ridge
way Department of State since the date of July 7th, 2023, as an Assistant Secretary of State.
33. Employment in the Ridgeway Department of State requires going through a screening and
background checking process, which kenneytube passed as a requirement of his employ
ment.
34. kenneytube’s ROBLOX profile currently shows, and at the time of the screening approxi
mately showed, that he has 125 friends, 5 created games, 2,592 place visits, 13 pages of
favorited games, 10 pages of groups, along with many pages of badges and owned inven
tory items.
35. kenneytube has no criminal record or citations, and did not have any at the time of the back
ground screening.
IV. NINJAZAWESOMES’ ROBLOX ACCOUNT IS PLAINLY NOT AN ALT AND HIS
BACKGROUND IS OTHERWISE CLEAR
36. NinjazAwesomes’ ROBLOX account was created over 5 years ago, on May 18th, 2017.
37. NinjazAwesomes currently holds, and at the time of the screening held, employment in the
Ridgeway Department of State since the date of June 16th, 2024, as a Civil Affairs Resource
Officer.
38. Employment in the Ridgeway Department of State requires going through a screening and
background checking process, which NinjazAwesomes passed as a requirement of his em
ployment.
3
39. NinjazAwesomes’ ROBLOX profile currently shows, and at the time of the screening ap
proximately showed, that he has 186 friends, 6 created games, 74 place visits, 6 pages of
favorited games, 12 pages of groups, along with many pages of badges and owned inven
tory items.
40. NinjazAwesomes has no criminal record or citations, and did not have any at the time of the
background screening.
COUNT 1
1 R. Stat. § 3114 Official Misconduct
41. Plaintiff incorporates all prior paragraphs of this complaint as part of this cause of action.
42. 1 R. Stat. § 3114 defines official misconduct as “Any individual who is a public servant and
commits an act relating to his office but constitutes an unauthorized exercise of his official
functions, where a reasonable person with his training, expertise, and experiences should
know that such act is unauthorized, or refrains from performing a duty which is imposed
upon him by law or is clearly inherent in the nature of his office.”
43. U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1, states “nor shall any State . . . deny to any person within its
jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
44. Rid. Const. art. I, § 4, states “That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common
benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation, or community, and not for the partic
ular emolument or advantage of any single person, or set of persons, who are a part only of
that community.”
45. LETC, and by extension its officers and Defendants, are inherently prescribed a duty to act
lawfully and in accordance with the United States Constitution and Ridgeway Constitution.
See Rid. Const. art. I, § 3.
46. Performing acts that are contrary to the laws of the State and its Constitution are plainly
“an unauthorized exercise of . . . official functions”, and a reasonable person with “the same
training, expertise, and experiences” would not violate State law in an official act. Id.
47. Defendant Impediage arbitrarily, without conclusive reasoning, without affording Robin5D
“equal protection of the laws,” and solely in his own interests, denied the background check
of Robin5D, preventing him from gaining a LETC certificate and pursuing a law enforce
ment career. Id.
COUNT 2
1 R. Stat. § 3115 Deprivation of Rights
48. Plaintiff incorporates all prior paragraphs of this complaint as part of this cause of action.
49. 1 R. Stat. § 3115 defines deprivation of rights as “Every person who, under color of any
statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citi
zen of the State of Ridgeway or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation
of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws.”
50. U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1, states “nor shall any State . . . deny to any person within its
jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
4
51. Rid. Const. art. I, § 4, states “That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common
benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation, or community, and not for the partic
ular emolument or advantage of any single person, or set of persons, who are a part only of
that community.”
52. Defendant Impediage arbitrarily, without conclusive reasoning, without affording Robin5D
“equal protection of the laws,” and solely in his own interests, denied the background check
of Robin5D, preventing him from gaining a LETC certificate and pursuing a law enforce
ment career. By doing so, Impediage deprived Robin5D of his right to “equal protection of
the laws,” along with performing this act solely for “the advantage” of himself. Id.
COUNT 3
1 R. Stat. § 3114 Official Misconduct
53. Plaintiff incorporates all prior paragraphs of this complaint as part of this cause of action.
54. 1 R. Stat. § 3114 defines official misconduct as “Any individual who is a public servant and
commits an act relating to his office but constitutes an unauthorized exercise of his official
functions, where a reasonable person with his training, expertise, and experiences should
know that such act is unauthorized, or refrains from performing a duty which is imposed
upon him by law or is clearly inherent in the nature of his office.”
55. U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1, states “nor shall any State . . . deny to any person within its
jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
56. Rid. Const. art. I, § 4, states “That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common
benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation, or community, and not for the partic
ular emolument or advantage of any single person, or set of persons, who are a part only of
that community.”
57. LETC, and by extension its officers and Defendants, are inherently prescribed a duty to act
lawfully and in accordance with the United States Constitution and Ridgeway Constitution.
See Rid. Const. art. I, § 3.
58. Performing acts that are contrary to the laws of the State and its Constitution are plainly
“an unauthorized exercise of . . . official functions”, and a reasonable person with “the same
training, expertise, and experiences” would not violate State law in an official act. Id.
59. Defendant Impediage arbitrarily, without conclusive reasoning, without affording NinjazA
wesomes “equal protection of the laws,” and solely in his own interests, denied the back
ground check of NinjazAwesomes, preventing him from gaining a LETC certificate and
pursuing a law enforcement career. Id.
COUNT 4
1 R. Stat. § 3115 Deprivation of Rights
60. Plaintiff incorporates all prior paragraphs of this complaint as part of this cause of action.
61. 1 R. Stat. § 3115 defines deprivation of rights as “Every person who, under color of any
statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citi
5
zen of the State of Ridgeway or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation
of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws.”
62. U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1, states “nor shall any State . . . deny to any person within its
jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
63. Rid. Const. art. I, § 4, states “That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common
benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation, or community, and not for the partic
ular emolument or advantage of any single person, or set of persons, who are a part only of
that community.”
64. Defendant Impediage arbitrarily, without conclusive reasoning, without affording NinjazA
wesomes “equal protection of the laws,” and solely in his own interests, denied the back
ground check of NinjazAwesomes, preventing him from gaining a LETC certificate and
pursuing a law enforcement career. By doing so, Impediage deprived NinjazAwesomes of
his right to “equal protection of the laws” by the State, along with performing this act solely
for “the advantage” of himself. Id.
COUNT 5
1 R. Stat. § 3114 Official Misconduct
65. Plaintiff incorporates all prior paragraphs of this complaint as part of this cause of action.
66. 1 R. Stat. § 3114 defines official misconduct as “Any individual who is a public servant and
commits an act relating to his office but constitutes an unauthorized exercise of his official
functions, where a reasonable person with his training, expertise, and experiences should
know that such act is unauthorized, or refrains from performing a duty which is imposed
upon him by law or is clearly inherent in the nature of his office.”
67. U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1, states “nor shall any State . . . deny to any person within its
jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
68. Rid. Const. art. I, § 4, states “That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common
benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation, or community, and not for the partic
ular emolument or advantage of any single person, or set of persons, who are a part only of
that community.”
69. LETC, and by extension its officers and Defendants, are inherently prescribed a duty to act
lawfully and in accordance with the United States Constitution and Ridgeway Constitution.
See Rid. Const. art. I, § 3.
70. Performing acts that are contrary to the laws of the State and its Constitution are plainly
“an unauthorized exercise of . . . official functions”, and a reasonable person with “the same
training, expertise, and experiences” would not violate State law in an official act. Id.
71. Defendant drjack0 arbitrarily, without conclusive reasoning, and without affording kenney
tube “equal protection of the laws,” ordered the denial of the background check of kenney
tube, preventing him from gaining a LETC certificate and pursuing a law enforcement career.
COUNT 6
1 R. Stat. § 3115 Deprivation of Rights
6
72. Plaintiff incorporates all prior paragraphs of this complaint as part of this cause of action.
73. 1 R. Stat. § 3115 defines deprivation of rights as “Every person who, under color of any
statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citi
zen of the State of Ridgeway or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation
of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws.”
74. U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1, states “nor shall any State . . . deny to any person within its
jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
75. Rid. Const. art. I, § 4, states “That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common
benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation, or community, and not for the partic
ular emolument or advantage of any single person, or set of persons, who are a part only of
that community.”
76. Defendant drjack0 arbitrarily, without conclusive reasoning, and without affording kenney
tube “equal protection of the laws,” ordered the denial of the background check of kenney
tube, preventing him from gaining a LETC certificate and pursuing a law enforcement ca
reer. By doing so, drjack0 deprived kenneytube of his right to “equal protection of the laws.”
COUNT 7
1 R. Stat. § 3114 Official Misconduct
77. Plaintiff incorporates all prior paragraphs of this complaint as part of this cause of action.
78. 1 R. Stat. § 3114 defines official misconduct as “Any individual who is a public servant and
commits an act relating to his office but constitutes an unauthorized exercise of his official
functions, where a reasonable person with his training, expertise, and experiences should
know that such act is unauthorized, or refrains from performing a duty which is imposed
upon him by law or is clearly inherent in the nature of his office.”
79. U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1, states “nor shall any State . . . deny to any person within its
jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
80. Rid. Const. art. I, § 4, states “That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common
benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation, or community, and not for the partic
ular emolument or advantage of any single person, or set of persons, who are a part only of
that community.”
81. LETC, and by extension its officers and Defendants, are inherently prescribed a duty to act
lawfully and in accordance with the United States Constitution and Ridgeway Constitution.
See Rid. Const. art. I, § 3.
82. Performing acts that are contrary to the laws of the State and its Constitution are plainly
“an unauthorized exercise of . . . official functions”, and a reasonable person with “the same
training, expertise, and experiences” would not violate State law in an official act. Id.
83. Defendant drjack0 arbitrarily, without conclusive reasoning, and without affording HERE
COMESTHEFBI “equal protection of the laws,” ordered the denial of the background check
of HERECOMESTHEFBI, preventing him from gaining a LETC certificate and pursuing a
law enforcement career.
7
COUNT 8
1 R. Stat. § 3115 Deprivation of Rights
84. Plaintiff incorporates all prior paragraphs of this complaint as part of this cause of action.
85. 1 R. Stat. § 3115 defines deprivation of rights as “Every person who, under color of any
statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citi
zen of the State of Ridgeway or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation
of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws.”
86. U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1, states “nor shall any State . . . deny to any person within its
jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
87. Rid. Const. art. I, § 4, states “That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common
benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation, or community, and not for the partic
ular emolument or advantage of any single person, or set of persons, who are a part only of
that community.”
88. Defendant drjack0 arbitrarily, without conclusive reasoning, and without affording HERE
COMESTHEFBI “equal protection of the laws,” ordered the denial of the background check
of HERECOMESTHEFBI, preventing him from gaining a LETC certificate and pursuing a
law enforcement career. By doing so, drjack0 deprived HERECOMESTHEFBI of his right
to “equal protection of the laws.”
8
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray that the Court–
89. As to counts 1 through 8, award Plaintiffs injunctive relief in the form of an order compelling
LETC, and by extension Defendant drjack0, to—
a. reverse the denial of the background checks conducted on Plaintiffs,
b. reconduct the background check process on Plaintiffs, and continue their application
process affording them equal process as with other similarly screened members of Class
14, admitting them to a class of LETC in the case that this reconducted review and
final screening is accepted, and
c. reverse and reconduct as per the aforementioned any other background checks in Class
14 that were not conducted in accordance with the law.
90. As to counts 1 through 8, award Plaintiffs declaratory relief in the form of declaring that
LETC denied Plaintiffs background checks in error and in violation of the law.
Dated this 17th day of August, 2024.
Respectfully submitted,
Robin5D
Robin5D, Esq.
R. Bar No. 28105
D: @checkraisefold
Legacy Legal Group, LLC.
9
In the Superior Court of
the State of Ridgeway
Robin5D, HERECOMESTHEFBI,
kenneytube, NinjazAwesomes,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
Impediage, drjack0,
Defendant(s).
Case No. RSCCV3435
Initial Disclosures
Hon. Judge t1dtony
INITIAL DISCLOSURES
Plaintiff Robin5D, in pro per, and representing HERECOMESTHEFBI, kenneytube, and NinjazA
wesomes pro bono (hereinafter jointly as Plaintiffs), submits this document in the aforementioned
matter, pursuant to Rid. Civ. P. 19.
INITIAL DISCOVERY
Plaintiffs submit the following articles as initial discovery as to the tortious claims listed within
the civil complaint, pursuant to Rid. Civ. P. 19:
1. Exhibit A Response by LETC’s Freedom of Information Officer to Robin5D’s Freedom of
Information request regarding his background check denial reasoning.
2. Exhibit B Deleted and logged Discord messages in the State of Ridgeway Discord server sent
by Impediage regarding the background check denial reasoning of HERECOMESTHEFBI.
3. Exhibit C Direct message history between kenneytube and drjack0.
WITNESSES
Plaintiffs submit the following articles as their witnesses as to the tortious claims listed within the
civil complaint:
1. Robin5D Lay Witness
2. HERECOMESTHEFBI Lay Witness
3. NinjazAwesomes Lay Witness
4. kenneytube Lay Witness
5. Impediage Lay Witness
6. drjack0 Lay Witness
10
Dated this 17th day of August, 2024.
Respectfully submitted,
Robin5D
Robin5D, Esq.
R. Bar No. 28105
D: @checkraisefold
Legacy Legal Group, LLC.
11
