SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
Citation:
warlockings v. KouteiKatsuhito,
RSC-CV3070
DATE OF JUDGEMENT:
July Twenty Eighth, Two Thousand and
Twenty Four
warlockings
Plaintiff
and
KouteiKatsuhito
Defendant
I. Introduction
[1] On June 14th, Plaintiff warlockings approached the defendant, KouteiKatsuhito,
requesting to purchase their property located within the State of Ridgeway. Over the
course of two days, both parties negotiated an agreement regarding the payment for
the property and the transfer of the property into the possession of the Plaintiff.
[2] On June 16th, the parties entered the game to conduct the transaction. Plaintiff
proceeded to transfer the initial $25000 down payment for the purchase of the
property to the defendant, followed by the defendant leaving the game and terminating
contact with the Plaintiff. A civil suit was subsequently filed in the Superior Court of
the State of Ridgeway, arguing that the defendant had defrauded the plaintiff and
breached the contract which was agreed upon.
II. First Cause of Action
[3] The Plaintiff has alleged that the Defendant, through entering a legal agreement
without the intent to honour the terms stimulated within the agreement (taking the
money of the Plaintiff before abandoning the agreement) has engaged in fraudulent
conduct.
[4] Under 1 R. Stat § 3108, Fraud is defined as “intentionally deceive(ing) another
party to secure unfair or unlawful gain.” The entrance of the Defendant into a contract
with the Plaintiff for the procurement of his house, without the intent to transfer the
property over to the Plaintiff, yet still receiving payment constitutes an unlawful gain.
Taking the money of the Plaintiff without providing them with their rightful due
violates this principle, and as such is considered fraud.
III. Second Cause of Action
[5] The Plaintiff has alleged that the Defendant, through entering a legal agreement,
and failing to abide by its provisions has committed a Breach of Contract. Under
Exhibit A, both parties agree to conduct the transaction of the house for a sum of 50
thousand dollars. This is further elaborated upon in Exhibit D, where the Plaintiff
negotiated the specifications of the exchange, establishing a 25 thousand dollar down
payment and the subsequent transfer of the property. This was agreed to by the
Defendant. In Exhibit I, we witness the parties enter Ridgeway County to conduct the
deal, with the Plaintiff transferring the down payment before having contact with the
Defendant cut.
[6] Under 1 R. Stat § 3107, the Defendant has breached the contract due to the fact the
Plaintiff pursued the agreed upon contract, followed by the defendant’s failure to
conduct the transfer of the property as agreed upon in Exhibit D.
IV. Relief
[7] Under 1 R. Stat § 3107, the Defendant is liable for the damages that were incurred
as a result of their breach of contract. As a result of this, $25000 shall be awarded to
the Plaintiff in the form of compensatory damages.
[8] Under both 1 R. Stat § 3108, and 1 R. Stat § 3107, the Defendant is liable to pay
Punitive Damages as a result of their actions. Because of this, $10000 dollars shall be
awarded to the Plaintiff in the form of Punitive Damages.
[9] Defendant is ordered to pay the legal fees of the Plaintiff which have been incurred
as a result of this lawsuit.
Dated at the City of Palmer, in the State of Ridgeway this 28th day of July, 2024.
koala4life
signa
