Rendered from the court's authenticated repository
Searchable full text
1,659 characters extracted
—
SUPERIOR COURT OF RIDGEWAY
Civil Action No. RSC-CV-2922
DEFENDANT’S FULL ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
Pursuant to Rid. R. Civ. P. 7(a), the Solicitor General, representing Defendant
OmniGalaxy, hereby submits their response and affirmative defenses to the
numbered paragraphs of Plaintiff’s Complaint.
PARTIES
1. Admitted.
2. Admitted.
JURISDICTION & VENUE
3. Admitted.
4. Admitted.
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
5. Paragraph 5 pleads a state-of-mind narrative to which no response is warranted.
In the event that a response is required, Paragraph 5 is admitted.
6. Admitted.
7. Admitted.
8. Admitted.
9. Admitted.
ARMAXNII,
Plaintiff,
v.
OMNIGALAXY,
Defendant.
10.Admitted and denied. It is admitted that Plaintiff did click the FOID, but it is
denied that it was presented or shown to Defendant.
11.Admitted.
CAUSE OF ACTION
(1 R. Stat. § 3201 – Official Misconduct)
12.All paragraphs under this heading are denied. Defendant asserts that Plaintiffs are
not entitled to any relief.
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
13. Defendant sets forth his affirmative defenses. By setting forth these affirmative
defenses, Defendant does not assume the burden of proving any fact, issue, or
element of a cause of action.
First Affirmative Defense
14.To the extent that Plaintiff seeks punitive damages against Defendant, Plaintiff’s
recovery of such damages is limited by Defendant’s immunity from personal
liability for actions undertaken in both his individual and official capacity (quasi).
Dated: May 26, 2024.
Palmer, Ridgeway.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ S. Stickza
Stickza
Solicitor General
Ridgeway Department of Justice
1 County Annex
Palmer, Ridgeway 33368
Counsel for Defendant
Document record
File size
162.3 KB
Uploaded
May 23, 2024 12:00 PM
Filed
May 23, 2024 12:00 PM
Filing code
COMPLAINT
Uploaded by
armaxnii
Notes
RSC-CV-2922 - Answer.pdf — archived from the Trello docket (https://trello.com/c/vLse1ha9)
