Rendered from the court's authenticated repository
Searchable full text
1,555 characters extracted
—
RESPONSE TO CIVIL COMPLAINT - 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IN THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
SUPERIOR COURT
whispersins,
Plaintiff,
vs.
T4CTICAL_H4WK, in his official capacity as
a Ridgeway Park Service Ranger,
Defendant
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: No. RSC-CV-2719
REPLY TO CIVIL COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY,
COMPENSATORY, AND PUNITIVE RELEIF
REPLY TO STATEMENT OF FACT
1. Admitted.
2. Admitted.
3. Admitted.
4. Admitted.
5. Admitted.
6. Admitted.
7. Admitted.
8. Admitted.
9. Admitted.
10. Admitted.
11. Denied.
12. Admitted.
13. In part denied, the LETC only provides a one-time training on the authority of
peace officers, not continuous training as the statement implies.
14. Denied.
RESPONSE TO CIVIL COMPLAINT - 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
REPLY TO JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. Admitted.
2. A statement, to which reply is not necessary.
3. Admitted.
REPLY TO PARTIES
1. Admitted.
2. Admitted.
REPLY TO FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
1. A statement, to which a reply is not needed.
2. Denied in part. Although it is true that the Ridgeway State Constitution does
guarantee persons the right against unreasonable searches and seizures, there
are exceptions which will be the topic of later pleadings by the Defense.
3. Denied. This is a case against a governmental agent is sued in their official
capacity, and pursuant to 1 R. Stat. § 3204 the Plaintiff is not able to
receive any monetary relief.
Dated this April 2nd 2024
/s/ stickza
Ridgeway Department of
Justice
stickza
Document record
File size
40.6 KB
Uploaded
Apr 24, 2024 12:00 PM
Filed
Apr 24, 2024 12:00 PM
Filing code
COMPLAINT
Uploaded by
whispersins
Notes
whispersins v. T4CTICAL_H4WK Reply to CC.pdf — archived from the Trello docket (https://trello.com/c/DopmehgC)