Rendered from the court's authenticated repository
Searchable full text
11,596 characters extracted
—
STATE OF RIDGEWAY
COUNTY OF RIDGEWAY
SUPERSKILLE;
HERECOMESTHEFBI,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ECTOPIEX; XXCOLGUYSS; DAUDSR;
MILITARYMAN_201; HEAVYROUND,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
RIDGEWAY COUNTY
CIVIL COMPLAINT
Plaintiffs, superskille ("Super" or "Plaintiff")and HERECOMESTHEFBI ("Droozy" or (“Plaintiff”)
"Plaintiff"), collectively referred to as Plaintiffs herein, by and through their undersigned attorneys,
hereby collectively file this complaint against the Defendants. The Defendants include EctoPiex, the CEO
of Ecto Insurance, DaudSr, who is the alternative account of ExtoPiex, xxcolguyss, who serves as the
head of security at Ecto Insurance, Militaryman_2011, also in a security role at Ecto Insurance, and
Heavyround, though not directly affiliated with Ecto Insurance, remains relevant to this case, allege:
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. The jurisdiction of the Court originates from Art. V, Sec IV “There shall be a superior court
which shall exercise original jurisdictions for all civil and criminal cases or controversies”
2. Venue is proper here because the incident took place in the county of ridgeway.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
3. On or about April 5th, 2024, the Plaintiffs found themselves at their residence, engaged in the
mundane task of rearranging furniture, when their peace was abruptly disturbed by the constant honking
outside, coming from none other than Militaryman_2011. Concerned by the disturbance, Droozy
wandered outside only to be confronted by both Defendants xxcolguyss and Militaryman_2011. The
sight of an automatic Solami strapped to Militaryman_2011's back compelled Droozy to retreat back
to their residence.
4. An exchange ensued between xxcolguyss and Militaryman_2011, with the former uttering
the phrase, "Them," to which Militaryman_2011 responded with, "Orders?" Without hesitation,
xxcolguyss commanded, "Kill" and "Both," prompting Militaryman_2011 to violently breach the property
by shattering their window and mercilessly ending the lives of the Plaintiffs within their residence.
5. Subsequently, Droozy found themselves face to face with both Defendants outside their
residence. xxcolguyss, directed Heavyround to inspect their direct messages, following which heavyround
callously executed Droozy. xxcolguyss callously justified this act of violence as an attempt to demonstrate
the consequences of not hiring the Defendant’s security services by saying "Trying to show you what
happens without security," commanding Heavyround to murder Droozy, once more.
6. At a later date , when the Plaintiff Droozy was outside inspecting their house, Defendant
Militaryman_2011 coming alone, mercilessly murdered Droozy using a Somali, and forcibly gained entry
by shattering a window, thus perpetrating yet another callous act of violence against the Plaintiff.
7. In a subsequent incident on or about April 7th, 2024, Defendant DaudSr, who is the alternative
alternative account of EctoPiex, Enacted a further act of violence against Plaintiff Droozy, by using a
Solami to brutally end their life and causing severe damage to their vehicle in a reckless display of
aggression within their neighbourhood.
8. These ruthless attacks were authorised from xxcolguyss, who is head of security at Ecto
Insurance, as retaliation for not contracting with the Defendants' security services.
CAUSE OF ACTION
COUNT ONE - TRESPASS (1 R. Stat. § 3101)
AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS
9. The allegations presented in this complaint are hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set
forth in this cause of action.
10. Under state law, “[a]ny individual who unlawfully enters the land of another individual without
lawful excuse is trespassing and shall be liable for punitive damages up to $2,500” 1 R. Stat. § 3101
11. On or around April 6th, 2024, Defendant Militaryman_2011 without legal justification or
excuse trespassed onto the Plaintiff Droozy’s place of residence using a Somali to destroy a window and
gain entry.
12. On or around April 6th, 2024, Defendant Heavyround without legal justification or
excuse trespassed onto the Plaintiff Droozy’s place of residence using a police-issued stetson m2 to
destroy a window and gain entry.
13. Defendants are therefore liable for Trespass and subject to the damages set forth above
for the same.
COUNT TWO & THREE - ASSAULT & BATTERY
(1 R. Stat. § 3103 - R. Stat. § 3102)
AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS
14. The allegations presented in this complaint are hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set
forth in this cause of action.
15. Under state law, “[a]ny individual who intentionally and voluntarily caused reasonable
apprehension of an immediate harmful or offensive contact is assault and shall be liable for punitive
damages up to $3,500” 1 R. Stat. § 3103
16. Plaintiff Droozy had reasonable apprehension of an immediate harmful contact when Defendant
Militaryman_2011 brandished their deadly weapon in a successful attempt to harm the Plaintiffs, which
was intentional and voluntary and meets the definition of assault.
17. Plaintiff Droozy had reasonable apprehension of an immediate harmful contact when Defendant
Defendant Heavyround brandished their deadly weapon in a successful attempt to harm the Plaintiffs,
which was intentional and voluntary and meets the definition of assault, and subject to damages set forth
above.
18. Plaintiff Droozy had reasonable apprehension of an immediate harmful contact when Defendant
Defendant DaudSr brandished their deadly weapon in a successful attempt to harm the Plaintiffs, which
was intentional and voluntary and meets the definition of assault, and subject to damages set forth above.
19. Under state law, “[a]ny individual who brings unconsented harmful or offensive contact against
another person is battery and shall be liable for punitive damages up to $4,500” 1 R. Stat. § 3102.
20. Plaintiff Droozy were unconsensually battered by the Defendant when Militaryman_2011 used
their deadly firearm to injure both Plaintiffs in their residence, which meets the definition of battery, and
subject to damages set forth above.
21. Plaintiff Droozy were unconsensually battered by the Defendant when Heavyround used their
deadly firearm to injure both Plaintiffs in their residence, which meets the definition of battery, and
subject to damages set forth above.
22. Plaintiff Droozy were unconsensually battered by the Defendant when DaudSr used their deadly
firearm to injure both Plaintiffs in their residence, which meets the definition of battery.
23. Defendants are therefore liable for Assault & Battery and subject to the damages set forth above
for the same.
COUNT FOUR - WRONGFUL DEATH (1 R. Stat. § 3109)
AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS
24. The allegations presented in this complaint are hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set
forth in this cause of action.
25. Under state law, “[a]ny individual who causes the death of another without legal cause or
justification shall be wrongful death and liable for compensatory damages and punitive damages up to
$5,000.” 1 R. Stat. § 3109
26. The Defendant Militaryman_2011 caused the wrongful death of the Plaintiffs without the legal
legal justification of doing so, using a Solami to cause harm and death of both Plaintiffs in two different
occasions.
27. The Defendant Heavyround caused the wrongful death of the Plaintiffs without the legal
justification of doing so, using a police-grade Stetson M2 to cause harm and death of the Plaintiff in two
different occasions.
28. The Defendant DaudSr caused the wrongful death of the Plaintiffs without the legal
justification of doing so, using a Solami to cause harm and death of the Plaintiff in.
29. Defendants are therefore liable for Wrongful Death and subject to the damages set forth above
for the same.
COUNT FIVE - TROVER (1 R. Stat. § 3109)
AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS
30. The allegations presented in this complaint are hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set
forth in this cause of action.
31. Under state law, “[a]ny individual who wrongfully takes another's personal property without legal
reason or justification is trover and shall be liable up to compensatory damages and $4,500 in punitive
damages.”
32. Defendant Heavyround, after killing Plaintiff Droozy in their residence, stole 2 boxes of
5.56 ammunition without legal reason or justification, when they were dropped by the Plaintiff after they
had died, and subject to damages set forth above.
33. Defendants are therefore liable for Trover and subject to the damages set forth above for the same
COUNT SIXTH - CONSPIRACY - (1 R. Stat. § 3111)
AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS
34. The allegations presented in this complaint are hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set
forth in this cause of action.
35. Under state law, “[a]ny individual who conspires or colludes between one or more parties
to deprive a third party of a legal right, or deceive a third party to obtain an illegal objective shall be civil
conspiracy and liable for compensatory damages for each offending party, injunctive relief, and $6,000 in
punitive damages for each offending party.”
36. Defendants collectively conspiring on behalf of Ecto Insurance against the Plaintiffs to
extort them into hiring them as security, by using acts of violence and intimidation tactics to turn a profit,
knowing that such acts are with an illegal objective, and in pursuing these acts with the intent to deprive
Plaintiffs of their legal rights.
37. Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640 (1946), established the doctrine that members of a
conspiracy can be held equally liable for crimes committed by any member of the conspiracy as long as
it’s reasonably foreseeable and done in completion of the conspiracy. This precedent solidifies the concept
of expanded liability.
38. Defendants are therefore liable for Conspiracy and subject to the damages set forth above for the
same.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests that the court grant relief as follows:
I. Grant judgement in favour of the Plaintiffs; and
II. Grant compensatory relief in the form of one Barrage 1014, one shell box, two Stetson M1s,
and five 5.56 boxes; and
III. Grant the maximum amount in punitive damages, in Ridgeway currency to deter further
repeated illegal conduct; and
IV. Grant the Plaintiff‘s reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in bringing this action; and
V. Grant any further relief that the court deems appropriate.
Dated: April 6th, 2024 Respectfully submitted,
/s/ flusherpoem39o
flusherpoem39o, Esq.
Counsel of Record
Cohn, Cicero, & Goodrich LLC
(111) 222-3333
demetriusdemarcusmontgomery
[email protected]
Attorney for Plaintiffs
STATE OF RIDGEWAY
COUNTY OF RIDGEWAY
SUPERSKILLE;
HERECOMESTHEFBI,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ECTOPIEX; XXCOLGUYSS; DAUDSR;
MILITARYMAN_201; HEAVYROUND,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
RIDGEWAY COUNTY
PLAINTIFF'S DISCOVERY
Evidence
1. Exhibit A - Shows the Defendant Militaryman_2011 killing the Plaintiff
2. Exhibit B - Showing the Plaintiff speaking with xxcolguyss and HeavyRound
3. Exhibit C - Shows the Defendant Militaryman_2011 killing the Plaintiff
4. Exhibit D - Shows the Defendant DaudSr killing the Plaintiff
5. Exhibit E - Showing the Defendant EctoPiex confirm that they are DaudSr
6. Exhibit F - Showing the Defendant EctoPiex confirm that they are DaudSr
Witnesses
1. HereComesTheFBI - Lay Witness
Dated: April 6th, 2024 Respectfully submitted,
/s/ flusherpoem39o
flusherpoem39o, Esq.
Counsel of Record
Cohn, Cicero, & Goodrich LLC
(111) 222-3333
demetriusdemarcusmontgomery
[email protected]
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Document record
File size
113.7 KB
Uploaded
Apr 7, 2024 12:00 PM
Filed
Apr 7, 2024 12:00 PM
Filing code
COMPLAINT
Uploaded by
herecomesthefbi
Notes
FBI v Ecto.pdf — archived from the Trello docket (https://trello.com/c/4HT5jpJC)
