Rendered from the court's authenticated repository
Searchable full text
7,472 characters extracted
—
This is a document filed in a mock court in the State of Ridgeway on Roblox.com, and does not constitute
real-life legal advice in any way, shape, or form.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
RETROFANCY,
Plaintiff-Petitioner,
v.
IM_THUNDERR,
Defendant-Respondent.
No. RSC-CV-2587
VERIFIED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
RetroFancy, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby brings this civil action and
petitions for a writ of habeas corpus and alleges that–
THE INCIDENT
1. On April 2, 2024, Plaintiff RetroFancy and JohnBlazkowicz were driving in Oakland
Park, a neighborhood in Palmer, Ridgeway. They drove down Belgrade Road and stopped at the
Oakland Gas Station when they saw a commotion.
2. Retro got out of John’s blue truck to go and see what was happening.
3. After the commotion ended, Retro returned to the truck.
4. As Retro was making his way back to the truck, he saw that a man wearing a prison
jumpsuit outside the Oakland Gas Station was killed by someone.
5. Retro then ran to the truck, got into the driver’s seat, and tried to depart as soon as
possible to avoid being killed.
6. Then, Defendant Im_Thunderr and other law enforcement officers responded and soon
thereafter arrested Retro for allegedly stealing a vehicle, even though he had John’s permission at
all times relevant to drive and be inside John’s blue truck.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
7. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to Article V, Section IV of the Constitution of the
State of Ridgeway.
8. Venue is proper in this Court because the events described in this Complaint took place
within Ridgeway County.
9. This paragraph is left intentionally blank.
PARTIES
10. Plaintiff RetroFamcy is a resident of the State of Ridgeway.
- 1 -
This is a document filed in a mock court in the State of Ridgeway on Roblox.com, and does not constitute
real-life legal advice in any way, shape, or form.
11. Defendant Im_Thunderr is sued in his quasi-official capacity as a Trooper of the
Ridgeway State Police.
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
(Official Misconduct – False Imprisonment)
(1 R.S. § 3114)
12. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1-6 as if fully set
forth herein.
13. “Any individual who is a public servant and commits an act relating to his office but
constitutes an unauthorized exercise of his official functions, knowing that such act is
unauthorized … shall be liable for compensatory damages; injunctive reliefs restraining the
individual from performing a certain action, or orders instructing the individual to perform a
certain action; and punitive damages up to three thousand dollars ($3,000).” 1 R.S. § 3114.
14. To prove false imprisonment, Plaintiff must prove that Defendant either without legal
authority or justification, restrained or restricted Plaintiff’s movement or restrained Plaintiff’s
permission. 1 R.S. § 204. “The essential elements of false imprisonment are: (1) the detention or
restraint of one against [their] will, and (2) the unlawfulness of the detention or restraint.” 32
Am. Jur. 2d False Imprisonment § 7 (2007).
15. Defendant violated State Police policy by exceeding his powers as a peace officer of this
State by unlawful conduct, namely falsely arresting Plaintiff. See State Police Dept. Policy Guide
§ 301-5.7(b) (“The following are illustrative of causes for administrative action … exceeding
lawful peace officer powers by unreasonable, unlawful, or excessive conduct.”)
16. Defendant also committed common law false imprisonment. Defendant unlawfully
caused the detention and restraint of Plaintiff and did so unlawfully by not having probable cause
to believe that Plaintiff had committed a crime.
17. Defendant arrested Plaintiff for allegedly stealing a truck, even though the truck belonged
to Plaintiff’s friend and at the time of the incident, they were both in the truck until they stopped
to see what was going on at the Gas Station as there was a man in a prison suit standing at the
Gas Station.
18. After seeing that unique individual, Plaintiff returned to his friend’s truck, whereupon a
third-party actor killed Plaintiff’s friend.
- 2 -
This is a document filed in a mock court in the State of Ridgeway on Roblox.com, and does not constitute
real-life legal advice in any way, shape, or form.
19. Plaintiff then got into the driver’s seat and drive off, leaving the scene as he was in fear of
being attacked too by said third party actor. As Plaintiff was attempting to leave, Defendant got
to the scene and arrested Plaintiff.
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
(Habeas Corpus)
(1 R.S. § 2210)
20. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1-6 as if fully set
forth herein.
21. “In assessing petitions for writs of habeas corpus concerning arrests, the first question to
be asked is whether the police were legally entitled to make that arrest — that is, [] the police
had probable cause that a crime was committed. If the arrest was not lawful to begin with, the
inquiry ends there; the record must be removed. If not, the next and final question is whether the
petitioner was actually innocent of the [offense(s)] for which they were arrested.” In re
Zachcasisbeast, 1 R. Supp. 12, 12 (2022).
22. Defendant did not have probable cause (a prima facie case of guilt)1 to believe that
Plaintiff had committed a crime.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
Wherefore, Plaintiff prays that the Court–
ON THE FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
a. Declare that Defendant did not have probable cause to arrest Plaintiff;
b. Declare that Defendant falsely arrested Plaintiff;
c. Award Plaintiff actual damages;
d. Award Plaintiff punitive damages;
e. Award such other, further, or different relief as may be just and proper.
ON THE SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
f. Declare that Defendant did not have probable cause to arrest Plaintiff;
g. Award Plaintiff expungement of Arrest Record No. 20244337bb09b3a;
h. Award such other, further, or different relief as may be just and proper.
1 Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103, 119 (1975).
- 3 -
This is a document filed in a mock court in the State of Ridgeway on Roblox.com, and does not constitute
real-life legal advice in any way, shape, or form.
Respectfully submitted.
Dated: April 16, 2024
Palmer, Ridgeway
DORKJACOB LAW, PLLC
/s/ DorkJacob
—————————————————————————————————————————————
DorkJacob
Ridgeway Bar No. 17135
Counsel of Record
1B Palm View
Palmer, Ridgeway
Discord: izzardizzard
[email protected]
Attorney for Plaintiff
- 4 -
This is a document filed in a mock court in the State of Ridgeway on Roblox.com, and does not constitute
real-life legal advice in any way, shape, or form.
VERIFICATION
THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
COUNTY OF RIDGEWAY
I, RetroFancy, declare as follows–
1. I am of sound mind and capable of making this statement. I have personal knowledge of
the facts written in this statement. I understand that if I lie in this statement, I may be held
criminally responsible. This statement is accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.
2. My name is RetroFancy. I am the Plaintiff-Petitioner in RetroFancy v. Im_Thunderr, No.
RSC-CV-2587.
3. The statements in the Verified Second Amended Complaint and Petition for a Writ of
Habeas Corpus filed in said action are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on April 16, 2024 /s/ RetroFancy
—————————————————————————————————————————————
RetroFancy
Discord: retrofancy
- 5 -
Document record
File size
106.8 KB
Uploaded
Apr 2, 2024 12:00 PM
Filed
Apr 2, 2024 12:00 PM
Filing code
COMPLAINT
Uploaded by
retrofancy
Notes
First Amended Complaint.pdf — archived from the Trello docket (https://trello.com/c/4leONByJ)