Rendered from the court's authenticated repository
Searchable full text
2,283 characters extracted
—
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
TrendLUV
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
DOCKET NO. RSC-CV-2575
Plaintiff
v.
Ridgeway County Transit Authority
Defendant
DEFENDANT’S REPLY TO THE CIVIL COMPLAINT
PARTIES
1. Admit
2. Admit
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
3. Admit
4. Admit
STATEMENT OF FACTS
5. Admit
6. Admit
7. Admit
8. Admit
9. Admit
CAUSE OF ACTION
10. Admit
11. Admit
12. Deny; the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution is not an analog to the Sixth
Amendment of the Ridgeway Constitution. Nowhere in the Sixth Amendment of the Ridgeway
Constitution is the right to property explicitly mentioned. Rather, the Fifth Amendment of the
Ridgeway Constitution describes the right to property and the circumstances under which it can
be abridged.
13. Admit/Deny; the defense admits that federal precedent is used in Ridgeway to guide
interpretation of relative issues. The defense denies that the Ridgeway Constitution creates an
entitlement to due process regarding personal property in the same way that the United States
Constitution does. The defense denies that “liberty” is synonymous with, or encompasses,
“property” and also that the Fifth Amendment of the Ridgeway Constitution should be
disregarded in the application of a person’s right to “property.” With these assertions in mind, the
defense denies that federal precedent regarding the Fifth Amendment of the United States
Constitution is applicable to the reading of Ridgeway’s Sixth Amendment in regards to the right
to property.
14. Admit
15. Deny; see paragraph 13.
16. Deny; see paragraph 13.
17. Deny; see paragraph 13.
18. Deny; see paragraph 13.
19. Deny; see paragraph 13.
20. Admit
21. Deny; insofar as the holding relies on the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution for
reasons described in paragraph 13.
22. Deny; the defense denies that the plaintiff is entitled to challenge the seizure of their property
when such seizure is expressly authorized by the “Representative Body,” in this case, through
S3-14, sub-section 3.1.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
23. Deny; the defense denies that the plaintiff is entitled to the requested relief for the reasons
described throughout this pleading.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Hecxtro
Hecxtro, Esq.
Deputy Attorney General
Ridgeway Department of Justice
Counsel of Record
Document record
File size
82.3 KB
Uploaded
Mar 31, 2024 12:00 PM
Filed
Mar 31, 2024 12:00 PM
Filing code
COMPLAINT
Uploaded by
trendluv
Notes
TrendLUV v. RCTA Reply (1).pdf — archived from the Trello docket (https://trello.com/c/Jv35Jdj2)
