Rendered from the court's authenticated repository
Searchable full text
1,446 characters extracted
—
SUPERIOR COURT OF RIDGEWAY
Civil Action No. RSC-CV-2461
DEFENDANTS’ FULL ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
Pursuant to Rid. R. Civ. P. 7(a), Defendants Techiey and Stickza (collectively
“Defendants”), proceeding as pro-se representatives, hereby submit their response
to the numbered paragraphs of Plaintiff’s Complaint.
INTRODUCTION
1. The introduction is a summation of Plaintiff’s claims to which no response is
required. To the extent a response is required, Answering Defendant denies the
allegations as set forth in the Introduction.
JURISDICTION & VENUE
2. Admitted.
3. Admitted/Denied. Defendant denies that any tortious actions took place at all.
PARTIES
4. Admitted.
5. Admitted.
6. Admitted.
MATRIX_OC
Plaintiff,
v.
TECHIEY, ET AL.,
Defendants.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
7. Admitted.
8. Admitted.
9. Admitted.
10.Admitted.
11.Admitted.
12.Denied.
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
13.All paragraphs under this heading are denied. Defendants assert that Plaintiffs
are not entitled to any relief.
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
14. Defendants set forth their affirmative defense. By setting forth these
affirmative defenses, Defendants do not assume the burden of proving any fact,
issue, or element of a cause of action.
First Affirmative Defense
Failure to State a Claim
15. Plaintiff’s Complaint should be dismissed in its entirety because it fails to state
a claim upon which relief can be granted.
/s/ Stickza
Counsel of Record
/s/ Techiey
Department of Justice
Document record
File size
181.4 KB
Uploaded
Mar 13, 2024 12:00 PM
Filed
Mar 13, 2024 12:00 PM
Filing code
COMPLAINT
Uploaded by
matrix_oc
Notes
Response to Complaint - Techiey.pdf — archived from the Trello docket (https://trello.com/c/D5tlgIaj)
