Ridgeway Unified Courts

JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF RIDGEWAY

Searchable full text

7,633 characters extracted

—

STATE OF RIDGEWAY SUPERIOR COURT GMUEY; AND BIZZAARJADIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. RSC-CV-2311 COMPLAINT IN A CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, v. STEVOHATELIFE a/k/a STEVO7055 Defendant. CIVIL COMPLAINT IN THE ABOVE-ENTITLED ACTION Gmuey and BizzaarJadin, through their undersigned attorneys, bring this complaint against the Defendant and the allegations are as follows: PARTIES [1] Gmuey is a Tourist in the State of Ridgeway and a Plaintiff in this action. [2] BizzaarJadin is a Resident in the State of Ridgeway and a Plaintiff in this action. [3] StevoHateLife is a Resident and a Defendant in this action under the alias “StevoHateLife”. Stevo7055 is also a Resident under the alias “Stevo7055”. JURISDICTION & VENUE [4] According to Article V, Section IV of the Constitution of the State of Ridgeway, this Honorable Court is vested with the authority to entertain and adjudicate “all civil or criminal cases or controversies.” Plaintiff invokes this jurisdiction by filing to this court. [5] Venue is proper as the incident giving rise to the present litigation occurred in and around Alder, a geographic area situated within Ridgeway County, and thus subject to the jurisdiction and laws of the State of Ridgeway. STATEMENT OF FACTS [6] Gmuey (“Plaintiff One”, “Plaintiff 1”) and StevoHateLife a/k/a Stevo7055 (“Stevo”, “ the Defendant”) made a verbal agreement when the Defendant said “so u transfer then i unclaim and yall snatch it fast” [sic] and when Plaintiff One agreed by saying “k” [sic]. [7] The Defendant says “im almost joined” [sic]. About two minutes later, the Defendant instructs Plaintiff One to alert his friend “to send the 12.5k to Stevo7055”. [8] The Defendant then asks Plaintiff One “did [BizzaarJadin] send yet” and then proceeds to say “tell him to go atm to send the money so i can unclaim” [sic]. [9] Plaintiff One then, when replying to the Defendant’s request for BizzaarJadin’s contact information, identified his BizzaarJadin (“Plaintiff Two”) as “Jadin0421”. [10] Plaintiff One, Plaintiff Two, and the Defendant all arrive at an Automated Teller Machine (ATM) where Plaintiff Two conducts the transaction of 12.5 thousand dollars where it is expected that he will receive a house in return. After this transaction, both Plaintiff One and Plaintiff Two alert the Defendant that the transaction was completed where the Defendant then replied with “kk”. [11] Plaintiff One, Plaintiff Two, and the Defendant all board the white SUV and shortly after, with the money in his alternate account’s inventory, the Defendant leaves the game. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION 1 R. Stat. § 3108 - Fraud Against StevoHateLife a/k/a Stevo7055 [12] All paragraphs, facts alleged, or otherwise textual information contained within this complaint is reincorporated into the First Cause of Action for the purposes thereof. [13] Plaintiff One and the Defendant entered into a verbal agreement that for $12,500, the Defendant would unclaim his house for the Plaintiff to then claim it. [14] The Defendant and Plaintiff One were both well-informed parties on the terms of the agreement. In fact, the Defendant brought the monetary aspect of the agreement up numerous times throughout the interactions he had with Plaintiff One. Both parties also had legal capacity to enter into a legal agreement in the State of Ridgeway. [15] The Defendant fraudulently, maliciously, and with intent to unlawfully deprive the Plaintiff of $12,500 with false statements, entered into the agreement with Plaintiff One and Plaintiff Two, knowing the terms of this agreement, and then left the game failing to uphold the terms of the agreement by not unclaiming his home. [16] Plaintiff One and Plaintiff Two were both under the impression, by virtue of the Defendant’s statements, that they would receive the opportunity to claim ownership of a specific house. Unfortunately, this was not the case. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION 1 R. Stat. § 3107 - Breach of Contract Against StevoHateLife a/k/a Stevo7055 [17] All paragraphs, facts alleged, or otherwise textual information contained within this complaint is reincorporated into the First Cause of Action for the purposes thereof. [18] Considering that the spirit of agreeing to carry out a two-way transaction carries the same effect as signing an agreement, the Defendant’s oral agreement should be treated as such. [19] Rules promulgating contract enforcement vary by state. Ridgeway lacks the relevant thorough legislation to enforce agreements similar to this case which is why the Plaintiffs call upon the court to assess the statute. [20] Plaintiffs allege that this court may reasonably infer that the Defendant knew of his owed property to the Plaintiffs upon the completion of the agreed-upon transfer of $12,500. [21] All parties involved had mutual assent, where all three of them agreed to the terms of the agreement orally. [22] Plaintiff two, a party in this oral agreement, made an offer to the Defendant. The Defendant manifested an objective intent to accept the offer by agreeing to the payment promised and further reiterating the terms of the deal several times throughout the interactions Plaintiff One, and Plaintiff Two had with him. [23] The Defendant anticipatorily breached the agreement by taking the currency given him which was properly communicated to him to be for the return of a house owned and operated by the Defendant. The Defendant breached sufficient terms in the agreement to constitute an anticipatory breach. [24] Acceptance of the agreement was properly communicated to Plaintiff One and Plaintiff Two as the Defendant used equally expedient oral communication that Plaintiff One used to communicate his acceptance. [25] Pertaining to this agreement, the house and property thereof, was Plaintiff One and Plaintiff Two’s consideration in this agreement. $12,500 was the Defendant’s consideration in this agreement. [26] The Defendant had the capacity necessary to accept this agreement. The Defendant reasonably knew or should have reasonably known, upon consideration of all facts and stipulations, if the agreement was or was not in his interest. The Defendant demonstrated clearly that he accepted the offer multiple times, indicating he knew what he was agreeing to and had the mental capacity to make that consideration. [27] Purchasing houses or property for purposes of living is legal in the State of Ridgeway, the County of Ridgeway, and in Alder. At no time did the agreement call for a violation of applicable legislation. RELIEF [28] Pursuant to 1 R. Stat. § 3108, Plaintiff Two seeks $12,500.00 in compensatory damages from the Defendant due to his monetary loss as a result of this alleged fraudulent deal. [29] Pursuant to 1 R. Stat. § 3108, and only in the event that the court refuses to uphold (28), Plaintiff Two seeks an injunction, ordering the Defendant to relinquish his home ownership at the address promised to the Plaintiffs in coordination with Plaintiff Two to ensure that Plaintiff Two assumes ownership of the home. [30] Pursuant to 1 R. Stat. § 3108, Plaintiff One seeks $3,000.00 in punitive damages from the Defendant as to prevent further fraudulent activity by the Defendant. [31] Pursuant to 1 R. Stat. § 3108, Plaintiff Two seeks $3,000.00 in punitive damages from the Defendant as to prevent further fraudulent activity by the Defendant. Respectfully submitted, Derogatoryyy Clarke and Associates, LLP. RSB#19119 D: @racoontimes E: [email protected] notsfeelings Clarke and Associates, LLP. RSB#21101 D: @wisenheimerr E: [email protected] Attorneys for the Plaintiff(s) Submitted and dated: 02/13/2024

Civil_Complaint_%5B_gmuey%2C_et_al._v._StevoHateLife_a_k_a_Stevo7055_%5D.pdf

Original document

Searchable full text

Document record