SUPERIOR COURT
OF RIDGEWAY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RIDGEWAY
BRXKEN_NOOB,
Plaintiff(s)
v.
COLINTHEGREATEST,
Defendant(s)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. RSC-CV-2273
HERITAGE REPORTING CORPORATION
Official Reporters
1220 L Street, N. W., Suite 206
Washington, D.C., 20005
(202) 628-1888
www.hrccourtreporters.com
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RIDGEWAY
BRXKEN_NOOB,
Plaintiff(s)
v.
COLINTHEGREATEST,
Defendant(s)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. RSC-CV-2273
Palmer, R.W.
Sunday, February 25, 2024
The above-entitled matter came on for deposition
of Witness qLostful before the parties at 1:27 p.m.
APPEARANCES:
QLOSTFUL, Palmer, R.W.; Witness.
DEROGATORYYY, Palmer, R.W.; Counsel on behalf of the
Defendant.
PERHCSIXTY, Palmer, R.W.; Counsel on behalf of the
Plaintiff.
TURNTABLE5000, Palmer, R.W.; Special Master appointed
by the Court.
SPECIAL MASTER TURN: We will begin with
the deposition. As of now, I will be the officer
appointed to oversee these proceedings. Do both
parties consent to me being the officer over this
matter?
PERCHSIXTY: Yeah.
SPECIAL MASTER TURN: Alright, so give
me a few minutes. I will then swear the witness
in and we will begin.
DEROGATORYYY: Yes.
SPECIAL MASTER TURN: Great. We will
begin the deposition. Let me first swear in the
witness.
(Whereupon, at 1:41 p.m., the Witness
QLOSTFUL, after having been first duly sworn, did
testify as follows.)
DIRECT EXAMINATION
BY MR. PERCHSIXTY:
Q: Can you confirm your role as Deputy
qLostFul of the Ridgeway County Sheriff’s Office?
A: Yes, however it's qLostful (not
qLostFul).
Q: Were you involved in transporting
Mr. colinthegreatest to the Gas Station in
Oakland on February 9, 2024?
A: It was a ride along. I did not
transport them, per se. I was under no impression
that the defendant was going to exit the vehicle
at any point, let alone commit a crime.
Q: Why were you transporting Mr.
colinthegreatest to the Gas Station in Oakland on
February 9, 2024?
A: See above.
Q: Were you aware of the defendant's
criminal history on February 9, 2024?
A: I was not aware of their criminal
history, no.
Q: In your role as a deputy, what
specific training have you received related to
ride-alongs?
A: I do not recall receiving training
regarding ride alongs, however I am aware that
there are regulations in the handbook which I
forgot about due to being a new hire.
Q: Can you describe any standard
protocols for transporting individuals in your
capacity?
A: Again, I do not recall the
regulations from the top of my head. It's all in
the handbook which is publicly available.
Q: What observations did you make upon
arriving at the Gas Station in Oakland on the
mentioned date?
A: I saw that the plaintiff was
committing atm fraud, as per the plaintiff's own
video.
Q: Did you witness any actions by Mr.
colinthegreatest that could be considered
obstruction of traffic or impersonation of an
officer?
A: I do not recall that.
Q: How did you interpret Mr.
colinthegreatest's actions at the Gas Station in
terms of potential threats or risks?
A: I do not recall his actions.
Q: Were there any immediate actions you
took in response to the observed behaviors?
A: If that's behavior in regards to the
plaintiff, I attempted to remove them from the
vehicle.
Q: The observed behavior in regards to
the defendant attempting to execute duties of a
peace office.
A: I'm not sure I recall that
happening.
Q: Can you describe the defendant's
actions immediately following the alleged
criminal activity involving the plaintiff?
A: I remember him running away from the
crime scene, that's all.
Q: The defendant?
A: Yes.
Q: You didn't attempt to collect your
ride along?
A: I cannot recall. As you can
appreciate, it was a long time ago. I cannot
remember what I had for dinner yesterday, sir.
Q: Can you describe any equipment or
devices you observed Mr. colinthegreatest using
during the incident?
A: Negative.
Q: Can you describe the events when Mr.
colinthegreatest mounted the roof of the
Plaintiff's vehicle?
A: I do not recall this.
Q: Were there any specific instructions
or orders given to Mr. colinthegreatest during
this time?
A: I do not recall this.
Q: You didn't inform your ride along(s)
to stay in the vehicle before beginning patrol?
A:
Q: Did you assess the safety
implications when Mr. colinthegreatest mounted
the Plaintiff's vehicle?
A: I do not recall this.
Q: You weren't there when the defendant
mounted the Plaintiff's vehicle?
Q: Were there any communications
between you and Mr. colinthegreatest during this
incident?
A: I do not recall any communications,
no.
Q: Did you witness the Defendant, Mr.
colinthegreatest, using a Barrage 1014?
A: I do not recall this.
Q: Were there any verbal commands given
by Mr. colinthegreatest to the Plaintiff during
this incident?
A: I do not recall this.
Q: What is the standard protocol for
law enforcement officers when encountering
non-deadly situations?
A: To resort to non-lethal methods,
this is also in the handbook. I can provide the
link if you like.
Q: Can you describe any actions taken
by law enforcement to defuse tensions or reduce
the intensity of the situation?
A: You'd have to give me a specific
scenario.
Q: The ride-along participant, Mr.
colinthegreatest, who is wearing a police uniform
and has a Barrage 1014 in their possession, exits
the vehicle and inserts themselves into a police
activity. What actions did you take to prevent
harm to the defendant and the plaintiff?
A: The fact that he was wearing a
police uniform is irrelevant as, at the time,
there was no law which made it illegal. I do not
remember the actions of the defendant therefore I
cannot comment.
Q: Were there any attempts made to
de-escalate the situation?
A: In regards to what?
Q: Were you present when the
Plaintiff's vehicle was shot at and destroyed?
A: No.
PERCHSIXTY: I’m done.
CROSS EXAMINATION
BY MR. DEROGATORYYY:
Q: Do you remember saying "I saw that
the plaintiff was committing atm fraud, as per
the plaintiff's own video."
A: I do.
Q: Did you instruct your ride along at
any time during the course of events to intervene
on the so-called ATM fraud?
A: I did not.
Q: Did he, at any time during the
course of the events, ask you for permission to
intervene on the so-called ATM fraud?
A: He did not.
Q: When you transported the Defendant
to this so-called ATM fraud, did you do so with
the intention of giving him the means to
intervene on this so-called ATM fraud?
A: I did not.
Q: Did you at any time anticipate that
the Defendant would intervene on the so-called
ATM fraud?
A: I did not.
Q: So, what the Defendant did was
entirely on his own accord?
A: Affirm.
Q: What does "affirm" mean, for the
record?
A: Affirmative, yes.
DEROGATORYYY: Nothing further.
(Whereupon, at 5:04 p.m., the
conference adjourned.)
