Rendered from the court's authenticated repository
Searchable full text
3,178 characters extracted
—
STATE OF RIDGEWAY
SUPERIOR COURT
ARTHUR_CHEN
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
DOCKET NUM. RSC-CV-2186
Plaintiff,
v.
CODKING2318
Defendant.
CIVIL RESPONSE IN THE ABOVE-ENTITLED ACTION
PARTIES
1. As to I(a)(1) of the Plaintiff’s Complaint, it is admitted.
2. As to I(b)(1) of the Plaintiff’s Complaint, it is admitted.
JURISDICTION & VENUE
1. As to II(1) of the Plaintiff’s Complaint, it is admitted.
2. As to II(2) of the Plaintiff’s Complaint, it is admitted.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
1. As to III(1) of the Plaintiff’s Complaint, it is admitted.
2. As to III(2) of the Plaintiff’s Complaint, Defendant is invoking Rid. R. Civ. P. 3(8)(b) and sets
forth a pleading that responding counsel does not have enough information to admit or deny this
avertment.
3. As to III(3) of the Plaintiff’s Complaint, Defendant is invoking Rid. R. Civ. P. 3(8)(b) and sets
forth a pleading that responding counsel does not have enough information to admit or deny this
avertment.
4. As to III(4) of the Plaintiff’s Complaint, Defendant is invoking Rid. R. Civ. P. 3(8)(b) and sets
forth a pleading that responding counsel does not have enough information to admit or deny this
avertment.
5. As to III(5) of the Plaintiff’s Complaint, Defendant is invoking Rid. R. Civ. P. 3(8)(b) and sets
forth a pleading that responding counsel does not have enough information to admit or deny this
avertment.
6. As to III(6) of the Plaintiff’s Complaint, it is denied.
7. As to III(7) of the Plaintiff’s Complaint, Defendant is invoking Rid. R. Civ. P. 3(8)(b) and sets
forth a pleading that responding counsel does not have enough information to admit or deny this
avertment.
ALLEGATIONS
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION (“FCOA”)
1. As to IV FCOA(2) of the Plaintiff’s Complaint, it is admitted.
2. As to IV FCOA(3) of the Plaintiff’s Complaint, it is denied.
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION (“SCOA”)
1. As to IV SCOA(5) of the Plaintiff’s Complaint, it is admitted.
2. As to IV SCOA(6) of the Plaintiff’s Complaint, it is denied.
RELIEF
1. As to V(1) (RELIEF) of the Plaintiff’s Complaint, it is denied and Defendant asserts that the
Plaintiff is not entitled to such relief.
2. As to V(2) (RELIEF) of the Plaintiff’s Complaint, it is denied and Defendant asserts that the
Plaintiff is not entitled to such relief.
3. As to V(3) (RELIEF) of the Plaintiff’s Complaint, it is denied and Defendant asserts that the
Plaintiff is not entitled to such relief.
4. As to V(4) (RELIEF) of the Plaintiff’s Complaint, it is denied and Defendant asserts that the
Plaintiff is not entitled to such relief.
5. As to V(5) (RELIEF) of the Plaintiff’s Complaint, it is denied and Defendant asserts that the
Plaintiff is not entitled to such relief.
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
1. Pursuant to Rid. R. Civ. P. 3(8)(c), Plaintiff offers LACHES to be used in his defense.
AVOIDED/EFFECT OF DENIAL
1. As to IV FCOA(1), under Rid. R. Civ. P. 3(8)(d), it does not require a response and should be
taken as denied or avoided.
2. As to IV SCOA(4), under Rid. R. Civ. P. 3(8)(d), it does not require a response and should be
taken as denied or avoided.
Respectfully submitted,
Derogatoryyy
RSB#19119
D: @racoontimes
E: [email protected]
Submitted and dated: 01/30/2024
Document record
File size
76.2 KB
Uploaded
Jan 24, 2024 12:00 PM
Filed
Jan 24, 2024 12:00 PM
Filing code
COMPLAINT
Uploaded by
Arthur_Chen
Notes
Civil Response [ Arthur_Chen v. Codking2318 ] [ RSC-CV-2186 ].pdf — archived from the Trello docket (https://trello.com/c/TtbufG7X)
