Rendered from the court's authenticated repository
Searchable full text
1,034 characters extracted
—
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
No. 2124
BETWEEN:
State of Ridgeway
Plaintiff
and
TALAN10101
Accused
JUDGEMENT ON EFFECT OF PLEA AGREEMENT
The government is alleged to have offered and then revoked a plea agreement, in a
breach of contract. The accused submits he intended to accept the plea agreement but
did not expressly accept it. Communication of acceptance is in question.
Even though the accused might have intended to accept, he never communicated this
intention to the government. The government as the offeror is in control of the mode
of acceptance, but in any case, silence does not amount to acceptance. (Felthouse v.
Bindley (1862), 11 CB (NS) 869, 142 ER 1037 (Exchequer Court)). A trial court was
correct to read an offeree's silence as "OK, no contract", ruled Dawson v. Helicopter
Exploration, [1955] SCR 868.
The government is not bound to their offer of a plea agreement of or before January 26,
2024.
Dated at the City of Palmer, in the State of Ridgeway on January 28, 2024.
“koala4Iife”
Judge koala4Iife
Document record
File size
52.7 KB
Uploaded
Sep 29, 2023 12:00 PM
Filed
Sep 29, 2023 12:00 PM
Filing code
CRIMINAL_COMPLAINT
Uploaded by
state of ridgeway
Notes
2124jmtpleaagreement.pdf — archived from the Trello docket (https://trello.com/c/0z4zJNjP)
