Rendered from the court's authenticated repository
Searchable full text
1,628 characters extracted
—
THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
RIDGEWAY SUPERIOR COURT
THR33SIX8,
Plaintiff,
-against-
DAVIDDEVIL2,
CARDINALMONTERRUH,
TALAN10101,
Defendants.
Case No. RSC-CV-2091
ANSWER TO CIVIL COMPLAINT
REFILED
Presiding Judge: Hon. koala4life
ANSWER TO CIVIL COMPLAINT
Defendants daviddevil2, CardinalMonterruh, and TALAN10101, proceeding with
counsel (notsfeelings, bar No. 21101), respectfully files this answer to the above-styled civil
action made on August 31, 2023, and accepted on September 21, 2023, as required under rule 7
of the Ridgeway Rules of Civil Procedure.
STATEMENTS OF FACT
1. Defendants agree.
2. Defendants agree.
3. Defendants agree.
4. Defendants agree.
5. Defendants agree.
6. Defendants agree.
7. Defendants agree.
8. Defendants agree.
9. Defendants agree.
10. Defendants contest. While S5-26 would provide the described protections, it is not in
effect and therefore does not.
11. Defendants agree.
12. Defendants agree.
13. Defendants agree.
14. Defendants agree.
15. Defendants agree.
16. Defendants deny.
17. Defendants agree.
18. Defendants deny.
a. Defendants deny.
19. Defendants agree.
Mid-War Efforts
1. Defendants agree.
2. Defendants contest claims regarding the injuring or killing of Canadian peace officers by
the defendant.
3. Defendants agree.
4. Defendants agree.
5. Defendants agree.
Vancouver’s Response
1. Defendants agree.
2. Defendants agree.
3. Defendants agree.
VENUE AND JURISDICTION
1. Defendants agree that the venue is proper and that this court has jurisdiction.
DATED: September 22, 2023 Respectfully submitted,
/s/ notsfeelings
notsfeelings, Esq.
Counsel for the Defendants
Counsel of Record
Document record
File size
73.9 KB
Uploaded
Aug 31, 2023 12:00 PM
Filed
Aug 31, 2023 12:00 PM
Filing code
COMPLAINT
Uploaded by
thr33six8
Notes
RSC-CV-2091 - thr33six8 v. daviddevil2 et al. - Answer to Civil Complaint (v2 refiled).pdf — archived from the Trello docket (https://trello.com/c/NY7d7ev1)
