THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
RIDGEWAY SUPERIOR COURT
thr33six8,
-against-
daviddevvil2, CardinalMonterruh,
TALAN10101,
Defendants.
RSC-CV-2091
CIVIL COMPLAINT
Presiding Judge:
thr33six8, tentatively proceeding without counsel hereby brings this civil action and for
their allegations against the Defendants, it is alleged as follows:
STATEMENT OF FACTS
1. On August 15th, 2023, Defendant & Senator daviddevil2 (David) wrote a new bill that
was a resolution; the resolution, called R5-25, would pit our state, the State of Ridgeway
(Ridgeway) against the City of Vancouver (CoV) in war if passed.
2. At 11:10 PM CST, Defendant & Senator TALAN10101 (Tally) published the bill on the
senate's board.
3. The resolution stated the following:
a. "...the Government of Vancouver has signaled an intent to attack and has declared
war on the State of Ridgeway…"
b. "...[our State's] constitution empowers the senate to declare war on foreign
entities…"
4. David stated the following after talking about the bill in the state's #general channel:
a. "The [CoV], as of August 14th, met in secret and declared war on Ridgeway"
(link).
b. "We were just informed of [the declaration of war from CoV] tonight" (link).
5. On August 16th, at 12:48 AM CST, Defendant & Senator CardinalMonterruh (Card)
commented on a citizen's comment about the war:
a. "Boy would I sure like to, too bad due process exists for so called unconstitutional
legislation that would propose immunity to violent crime charges against those
enlisted in the Canadian Armed Forces" (link).
6. Card created the "Enemy of the State Act" (S5-26) on the same day, which was a bill that,
once passed, would "...give legal immunities and exemptions to righteous Ridgewayians
who sought out to protect their homeland from the evil inhabitants of British Columbia"
(board link)
7. s. 2(1) of S5-26 states:
a. "[CoV] shall be defined as; 'A poorly made belligerent Municipality ruled by
dictators filled with inhabitants who lack real life social skills and take roblox
[sic] seriously".
8. s. 2(2) of S5-26 states:
a. "Canadian Armed Forces shall be defined as; "Any individual within the rogue
Nation of Canada enlisted in the Canadian Armed Forces"
9. s. 2(3) of S5-26 states:
a. "Vancouverite Government Official shall be defined as; "Any individual within
the Municipality of Vancouver holding public office".
10. S5-26 shields Ridgeway citizens from any criminal punishment arising out of any crimes
they have committed, is committing, or will commit against Canadian Armed Forces
(CAF) associates and CoV government officials (paraphrased from s. 3(1) of the act).
11. David has stated that largetitanic2 (Titanic), who is the governor of Ridgeway, "supports"
R5-25; David states that all of the senate supports R5-25 as well (paraphrased from here).
12. Around 5:50 PM, David states R5-25 has passed the senate; Ridgeway is at war with
CoV (link).
13. Tally recorded the vote count for R5-25 as 5-0-0.
14. David has stated that he & others planned to declare war on CoV (link).
15. David has stated that the governor asked the senate to declare war on CoV (link).
16. Very little or no records of the senate session that passed R5-25 is published or available
to the plaintiff.
17. Senator maplenorm has stated that proof of CoV's "declaration of war" was provided to
them by "our security council". Such proof is classified (paraphrased from here & nearby
messages).
18. As a reply to cart414414's comments on the war (link), David & Card have stated that the
senate doesn't have to prove the casus belli of their war. A casus belli is the reason for a
war.
a. Card also threatens to kill cart414414 (paraphrased from here).
19. On August 21st, Governor largetitanic2 vetoed S5-26, stating the following:
a. "It is my opinion that this legislation is a blatant violation of the constitutional
rights of citizens of Ridgeway who are also citizens of Mayflower. For the
government to authorize murder of individuals, even for a temporary length of
time, is wholly unethical and I cannot allow it to become law" (source).
MID-WAR EFFORTS
1. On August 17th, Card posts some information in the senate's "senate-posts"
announcement channel. The description of the channel is that it is for press releases and
posts from senators & their respective offices.
a. Card posts a picture of him with members of the OPM gang. OPM is a mysterious
gang within CoV that owns police-grade items such as tasers and assault rifles.
Card mentions that the senate is "collaborating with the only intelligent Canadians
left in efforts to overthrow the government…".
2. In this video, you can see Tally, who is under an alternate account, and Card shoot up the
municipal courthouse in CoV & injuring and/or killing peace officers protecting the
building.
3. Tally posts that "we are successfully taking control of [CoV] and holding up multiple
governmental buildings with masses. Down with Vancouver, we blow them up on gang
🔥". The post is accompanied with this image of Card & Tally inside the city hall. Their
usernames are hidden, however you can infer that Tally & Card are present in this image
because they are wearing uniforms the same seen in the previous video.
4. Card makes a lengthy statement on the war:
a. "As many of you dear Ridgewayians know, recently a violent attack was pledged
against us from the Rogue Nation of Canada. A pledge for war from the people
who sought to take our liberty and interrupt our very way of life. As inhabitants.
nay, VICTIMS of this attack you must take a stand, and I refuse to do anything
but. I spoke with alike senators on the topic, and with the help of like-minded
RIDGEWAY PATRIOTS we have conquered the maple monkey beast. We have
insurrected, overthrown and overtaken their government facilities, their welfare
offices (there's a lot of them, all of these flunkies live on hard earned tax dollars)
and most importantly, their godforsaken pizza stores, the only establishment that
frees their mind from the total dictatorship they live under, disallowing them to
live like us. To the Vancouverites viewing this very post I want to announce your
freedom, we have stormed, looted, raided, and killed your totalitarian
government. You will no longer be a slave of the state, forced to watch hockey
games and pay 33 percent of your income to shitty healthcare. Our millions of
patriots insurrected and raided with ease reporting 0 casaulties on the side of
Ridgeway, and 24 Million casualties on the side of Vancouver, mind you all of our
operators were playing with blindfolds. Their illusions of militarized police and
deployment of their 9 year old conscribed army had no chance against even the
weakest soldier we had deployed. I encourage you all to play this coal ass game,
and take a stand on their 'attack.' My fellow Ridgewayians, take a stand to say
fuck Canada, fuck casus belli, and fuck the geneva convention" (here is the link;
the grammatical errors & misspellings are intact). The post was also accompanied
by this image.
5. Tally encourages Ridgewayians to "create private companies" to "deploy" to CoV with
the intent to cause chaos and severely disrupt CoV (link).
VANCOUVER'S RESPONSE
1. On August 16th, CoV's Chief of Staff firesoldier123 made this statement about the
arbitrary war presented by Ridgeway:
a. "As you may know, the State of Ridgeway has enacted and declared war against
us. Their reason being that Vancouver declared war on them first in a hidden
council session. Also saying that they are going to "repay" our apparent
"treachery" with blood. Pretty crazy if you ask me when you see their dying state
and its delusional State Senate trying to seek attention".
2. CoV's Mayor sithmaster921 (Sith) made this statement about the arbitrary war presented
by Ridgeway:
a. …we find ourselves at war with Ridgeway[; Ridgeway is the aggressor.] They
have made blatantly false claims that our council has met in secret to declare war
against them. It cannot be more clear that that [sic] is false…[w]e are not the
aggressors here and we have never been" (link).
3. The mayor's office issued a travel advisory on August 17th for Ridgeway:
a. The Office of Foreign Affairs advises against all travel to the State of Ridgeway.
Since the illegal declaration of war against the City of Vancouver, residents from
Vancouver visiting Rigdeway [sic] have been targeted by Ridgeway security
forces. The government of Ridgeway regularly enforces arbitrary laws for the
purposes of starting conflict and detaining foreign nationals. The political and
security situation in the State of Ridgeway remains extremely volatile and
uncertain. Terrorists are very likely to try to carry out attacks in Ridgeway. There
is a high threat of terrorist attack affecting Vancouver residents, including from
groups and individuals who view the City of Vancouver and its residents as
targets. You should remain vigilant at all times. You should not travel to
Ridgeway even for the purposes of engaging in combat. The Commander in Chief
and Brigadier General have enacted a defensive strategy focused on protecting
our homeland rather than engaging in combat. It is clear that the sole purpose for
Ridgeway's illegal hostilities is to benefit their in-game activity; no forces or
organized militia will be deployed to Ridgeway.
VENUE
1. Venue is proper in this Court because the alleged actions took place in the State and
respective discords, which are subject to the laws of the State and County of Ridgeway.
PARTIES
1. thr33six8 is a citizen of the State of Ridgeway & has residency in CoV.
2. Defendant daviddevvil2 is a citizen of the State of Ridgeway and is a senator in the state's
senate; daviddevvil2 is being sued in their official capacity as a senator and in their
individual capacity.
3. Defendant CardinalMonterruh is a citizen of the State of Ridgeway and is a senator in the
state's senate; CardinalMonterruh is being sued in their official capacity as a senator and
in their individual capacity.
4. Defendant TALAN10101 is a citizen of the State of Ridgeway and is president pro
tempore in the state's senate; they are being sued in their official capacity as president pro
tempore and in their individual capacity
TORTS ALLEGED
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
(1 R. Stat. § 3314 - Official Misconduct)
Defendants acted ultra vires
1. Plaintiff incorporates by reference all prior allegations as if being alleged in this action;
the tort of official misconduct applies to all defendants.
2. Article 1, Section 10 of the U.S. constitution (sourced from here) has a statement
regarding powers of the states:
a. "No State shall, without the Consent of Congress…enter into any Agreement or
Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless
actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
3. 1 R. Stat. § 3314 states:
a. Any individual who is a public servant and commits anact [sic] relating to his
office but constitutes anunauthorized [sic] exercise of his official functions,
knowing that such act is unauthorized; or refrains from performing a duty which
is imposed upon him by law or is clearly inherent in the nature of his office.
4. The senate could not reach congress because congress hasn't been "implemented" in the
group of the State of Ridgeway.
5. Therefore, the senate does not have the ability to declare war.
6. Because all of the defendants have declared war without the power to, they have acted
ultra vires, therefore, they have committed official misconduct.
Defendants violated due process
1. This reasoning behind the official misconduct tort being alleged only applies if the judge
determines that the senate has the power to declare war on foreign entities.
2. art. 1, s. Ⅴ of the Ridgeway Constitution states:
a. "That every member of society hath a right to be protected in the enjoyment of
life, liberty, and property…"
3. s. 1 of the fourteenth/14th/ⅩⅣ amendment (14thA) of the U.S. constitution states:
a. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or
immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person
of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person
within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
4. R5-25 has claimed that Vancouver's government has "...signaled an intent to attack and
has declared war on the State of Ridgeway".
5. War is inherently violent and has been inherently violent through history (ex. WWⅡ).
6. Because war is violent, it can be seen as an event that allows those who have declared
war to deprive life, liberty & property of the entity who has been warred on.
7. Because war deprives life, liberty & property (hereinafter referred to as "protected
interests"), it, therefore, requires due process; therefore, a casus belli is an element for the
senate to declare war as required in the U.S. const. amend. ⅩⅣ.
8. R5-25 has made a claim that Vancouver has declared war on them and that CoV has
signaled an intent to attack.
9. maplenorm claims the senate & defendants have been shown evidence of Vancouver
secretly declaring war on them by their "security council." The senate refuses to disclose
the evidence, saying it's classified.
10. Yet, CoV has stated they never declared war in private. The plaintiff interprets this as the
senate not having any evidence to prove their casus belli, or having insufficient evidence
to prove their casus belli.
11. The defendants' & senate's casus belli is insufficient; therefore, the defendants have
violated due process.
Defendants violated art. 1 s. Ⅳ of the Ridgeway Constitution
1. art. 1 s. Ⅳ of the Ridgeway Constitution states:
a. "That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common benefit, protection,
and security of the people, nation, or community, and not for the particular
emolument or advantage of any single person, or set of persons, who are a part
only of that community; and that the community hath an indubitable, unalienable,
and indefeasible right, to reform or alter government, in such manner as shall be,
by that community, judged most conducive to the public weal" (source).
2. The plaintiff interprets "instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security of the
people, nation, or community" as acts of government not being motivated by extreme
political beliefs.
3. Card has made these statements in the capacity and/or using resources granted to him as
a senator:
a. "I spoke with alike senators on [the war], and with the help of like-minded
RIDGEWAY PATRIOTS [sic] we have conquered the maple monkey beast…".
b. "...violent attack was pledged against us from the Rogue Nation of Canada".
c. "...fuck Canada, fuck casus belli, and fuck the geneva convention…".
d. "To the Vancouverites viewing this very post I want to announce your freedom,
we have stormed, looted, raided, and killed your totalitarian government. You will
no longer be a slave of [British Columbia & Vancouver]".
e. 'Down with Vancouver, we blow them up on gang 🔥"
f. "Boy would I sure like to, too bad due process exists for so called unconstitutional
legislation that would propose immunity to violent crime charges against those
enlisted in the Canadian Armed Forces"
4. The plaintiff infers through all of these statements made by Card, Card is motivated by an
extreme, prejudicial & political belief to approve of legislation & acts against
Vancouverites and Canada as a whole.
5. Also, Card's extreme, prejudicial & political belief is shown in his S5-26, a bill he
authored. S5-26 includes insulting and dehumanizing statements against Vancouverites &
Canada as a whole.
6. David and Tally share an extreme belief against Vancouverites. David has displayed hate
towards Vancouverites and the inhabitants of one of their allies, the State of Firestone.
Tally, using resources given to him as a senator, has encouraged residents to "cause pure
hell" in Vancouver.
7. All of the defendants have shown and acted on extreme political beliefs against
Vancouver & Vancouverites.
8. Our state's constitution disallows governments to act on extremist beliefs.
9. Therefore, the defendants violated art. 1 s. Ⅳ of the state constitution.
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
(1 R. Stat. § 3201 - Unlawful Policy, Order or Directive)
1. Plaintiff incorporates by reference all prior allegations as if being alleged in this action;
the tort of Unlawful Policy, Order or Director (UPOoD) applies to all defendants.
R5-25 is an unlawful directive
1. As aforementioned, R5-25 is an unlawful resolution. This resolution can be interpreted as
a directive because it directs that Ridgeway be at war against the CoV.
2. R5-25 can be considered as an unlawful directive because of the facts presented about the
resolution:
a. the defendants & senate did not follow Article 1, Section 10 of the U.S.
constitution to pass the resolution, which makes the resolution unlawful because it
has directives that are ultra vires.
b. R5-25 is a violation of due process. This was mentioned in detail.
3. Therefore, R5-25 is an unlawful resolution and can be tortious because the resolution
directs that Ridgeway be at war against the CoV. This meets the literal definition of a
directive.
S5-26 dehumanizes Vancouverites
1. s. 1 of the fourteenth/14th/ⅩⅣ amendment (14thA) of the U.S. constitution states:
a. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or
immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person
of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person
within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
2. S5-26 was a bill that attempted to dehumanize Vancouverites.
3. Dehumanize is a verb defined by Merriam-Webster as:
a. "to deprive (someone or something) of human qualities, personality, or dignity:
such as: [(1)] to subject (someone, such as a prisoner) to inhuman or degrading
conditions or treatment[; (2)] to address or portray (someone) in a way that
obscures or demeans that person's humanity or individuality; [(3)] to remove or
reduce human involvement or interaction in (something, such as a process or
place).
4.
5. s. 2(1) of S5-26 states:
a. "[CoV] shall be defined as; 'A poorly made belligerent Municipality ruled by
dictators filled with inhabitants who lack real life social skills and take roblox
[sic] seriously".
6. s. 2(1) has statements that insult Vancouverites and has statements that intentionally
portray Vancouverites as "...inhabitants who lack real life social skills…"; the senate
described Vancouverites as stereotypical nerds.
7. Historically, victims of dehumanization were subject to genocide and other obscene acts
& crimes when the dehumanization went on for long enough (ex. Holocaust).
8. Therefore, S5-26 was an attempt at dehumanization, is tortious under 1 R. Stat. § 3201,
and is being pursued as a tort in this action.
S5-26 protects hate crimes
1. S5-26's job was to protect Ridgeway citizens from any criminal punishment arising out of
any crimes they have committed, is committing, or will commit against Canadian Armed
Forces (CAF) associates and CoV government officials.
2. A hate crime is defined by the Legal Information Institute as:
a. "…a criminal act motivated by another person's (usually the victim's) race, color,
religion, national origin, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability. It is also
called a bias crime. A hate crime can be a crime committed against a person,
property, or society as a whole" (source).
3. The plaintiff interprets that "National origin" can apply to people holding public office in
Vancouver specifically because S5-26 targets Vancouverites holding public office. It
targets the national origin of the office that the person is holding.
4. Therefore, S5-26 shields criminal proceedings from any person who commits a crime
against CoV government officials, and therefore, it is tortious.
Plaintiff meets the elements for 1 R. Stat. § 3201
1. 1 R. Stat § 3201 requires that the plaintiff demonstrate they have received "concrete,
non-hypothetical harm from the policy, order, procedure, or directive" (source).
2. The plaintiff has suffered emotional damages from the statements against Vancouverites
made in S5-26.
3.
THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
(1 R. Stat. § 3315 - "Violation of rights")
1. Plaintiff incorporates by reference all prior allegations as if being alleged in this action;
the tort in 1 R. Stat. § 3315 will be referred to as "violation of rights."
2. 1 R. Stat. § 3315 states:
a. "Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or
usage, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the State of Ridgeway or
other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights,
privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to
the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for
redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or
omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be
granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was
unavailable."
3. R5-25 was a resolution passed by council that made Ridgeway declare war on the CoV
once passed.
4. As aforementioned, R5-25 is a violation of due process. Due process is a constitutional
right.
5. Therefore, R5-25 violated rights.
RELIEF REQUESTED
For Official Misconduct:
1. Pursuant to subsection ⅱ of 1 R. Stat. § 3314, the plaintiff requests that the $3,000 in
punitive damages be paid to the plaintiff by each defendant or collectively.
2. The plaintiff also requests a permanent injunction that orders the following:
a. the defendants cannot declare war on the CoV unless there is a legitimate,
reasonable thought that the CoV has shown an intent to attack and the defendants
can prove that there is an intent to attack.
b. The defendants must show any evidence that proves their casus belli behind
warring against R5-25.
For UPOoD:
1. The plaintiff requests an injunction that orders the following:
a. R5-25–through any means that the court can use–should be struck down.
For "Violation of Rights:"
2. The plaintiff requests an injunction that orders the following:
a. R5-25–through any means that the court can use–should be struck down.
DATED: Month 9th, 2023
Respectfully submitted,
——―――――――――――――
thr33six8
Plaintiff
/s/ thr33six8
