RIDGEWAY SUPERIOR COURT
EPIDERMISGUPTA69,
Petitioner.
v.
MATRIX_OC; in his official capacity as a
Trooper with the Ridgeway State Police
Respondent.
Case No. RSC-CV-1030
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS
CORPUS
Presiding Judge: koala4Iife
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
PETITIONER, epidermisgupta69, acting pro se, petitions for writ of habeas corpus to this
court in accordance with 1 R. Stat. § 2210-12.
PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDINGS
1. Plaintiff, epidermisgupta69, is a citizen and resident of the State of Ridgeway.
2. Defendant, Matrix_OC, is a citizen and resident of the State of Ridgeway and a
Trooper with the Ridgeway State Police.
JURISDICTION & VENUE
3. The Ridgeway State Constitution gives the Superior Court the ability to hear all
cases and or controversies. See Article V, Section 4.
4. 1 R. Stat. § 2210-12 furthermore empowers this Court to hear this controversy as it
is a writ for habeas corpus.
5. Venue is proper as the tortious actions occurred within the County of Ridgeway.
FACTS
6. The Ridgeway State Police (RSP) is a law enforcement agency tasked with
bringing to justice all violators of State law, ensuring equal protection of the laws,
and ensuring equal justice is granted to all.
7. The RSP holds law enforcement jurisdiction in the entire state of Ridgeway.
8. On or about February 8th, 2023, an RSP vehicle occupied by numerous law
enforcement officers from various agencies, being driven by matrix_oc, was
involved in a collision with the petitioner’s vehicle near the Ridgeway County Fire
Department firehouse.
9. The collision occurred when the vehicle being driven by matrix_oc drove down
the wrong way of a highway exit, on the left side of the road, and collided
perpendicularly with the petitioner’s vehicle.
10. Plaintiff Exhibit A depicts a diagram of the collision involving the actual site of it.
The red arrow depicts the path of the vehicle driven by matrix_oc, and the blue
arrow depicts the path of the vehicle driven by the petitioner.
11. The petitioner was driving regularly down Jackson street while violating no traffic
or criminal laws and thus was not at fault in this collision.
12. Matrix_oc and the other law enforcement officers (LEOs) then followed the
petitioner in his vehicle to the vicinity of Bloxmart, in Palmer, Ridgeway County.
13. Matrix_oc ordered the petitioner to pull over, and the petitioner complied, pulling
into the Bloxmart parking lot and exiting his vehicle. (Plaintiff Exhibit B begins at
this point)
14. Matrix_OC, and the other LEOs, acting in concert, all immediately exited the RSP
vehicle and surrounded the petitioner, pinning him to his car.
15. Matrix_OC, and the other LEOs, acting in concert, then began screaming
seemingly random insults in the petitioner's face, before threatening his life
repeatedly.
16. Matrix_oc then asked the other LEOs to quiet down, and informed the petitioner
that he was allegedly driving in an “unrestricted area”, and supposedly interfered
with a pursuit. (Plaintiff Exhibit B)
17. For the record, it is not illegal to drive in an “unrestricted area”, given the area in
question, by definition, is unrestricted.
18. Matrix_oc then handcuffed the petitioner and placed him in the back of the RSP
vehicle, with the rest of the LEOs officers piling inside of it as well.
19. As matrix_oc began to drive the vehicle, an LEO threatened the petitioner, stating
“youre literally gonna get blacked now” (sic).
20. The petitioner was then taken to the confines of the main PPD Precinct in Palmer.
21. At the PPD precinct booking station, matrix_oc angrily ranted about how the
petitioner was driving in an “unrestricted area”, and cursed him out before placing
him in a holding cell while he was still handcuffed.
22. Matrix_oc then left the PPD precinct to review the “unrestricted area” he had
been discussing.
23. After this, for no legitimate reason or purpose, the remaining LEOs, acting in
concert, entered the holding cell where the petitioner was, and began pushing him
and cursing him out.
24. One of the LEOs stated “we takin over bruh.”
25. The LEOs then, acting in concert, pushed the defendant into the corner of the
holding cell.
26. At this point, one of the LEOs, for no legitimate reason or purpose, brandished
first a tazer and then a retractable baton, both deadly weapons, at the petitioner,
while another told him “don’t run”.
27. The petitioner, in complete fear for his life, attempted to exit the holding cell when
its door was opened, but was grabbed by matrix_oc, who had re-entered the PPD
precinct at that point.
28. The petitioner was then placed in front of the booking computer, while the
defendants, acting in concert, insulted him and threatened his life.
29. The petitioner was charged with “trespassing” and remanded to the Ridgeway
County Jail.
30. The arrest report included inaccurate information, including that the plaintiff was
trespassing in an “unrestricted area”, and passed through a “DO NOT ENTER”
sign, which was not the case at all.
31. Petitioner never committed this crime and is actually innocent of it. The Officer
lacked probable cause to charge him with “trespassing” and no reasonable jury
would convict the Petitioner. The Officer, as well, had no warrant that justified the
arrest. Based on all available evidence, the arrest appears purely retaliatory.
REMEDY
32. In accordance with 1 R. Stat. § 2212, Petitioner seeks expungement of his criminal
record dated February 8th, 2023 with timestamp 21:47 for his arrest of § 4.05 -
Trespassing by Trooper matrix_oc.
EVIDENCE
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
DATED: 5/26/2023
Respectfully submitted,
epidermisgupta69
Plaintiff
/s/ epidermisgupta69
Stickza
Certificate of good faith
/s/ stickza
