Rendered from the court's authenticated repository
Searchable full text
1,357 characters extracted
—
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
CITATION: 9syn9 v. SOURCED_V, et al.,
RSC-
DATE OF JUDGEMENT:
January 22, 2023
BETWEEN:
9syn9
Plaintiff
and
SOURCED_V, MatthewSandringham, and insertreality
Defendants
REASONS FOR JUDGEMENT ON MOTION TO DISMISS
OF THE
HONOURABLE JUDGE KOALA4IIFE
I. Reasons for Judgement
[1] The cause of action created under s. 2.8 of the Administrative Procedure Act
(the Act) does not apply to individual, non-systematic violations of statutory procedure
for hiring practices.
[2] The Complaint makes an allegation of a violation of the Act that is individual
and non-systematic:
“The [agency] denied the Plaintiff as a result of their application of the wrong
criteria, standards, and procedures for background checks.”
[3] Whereas no allegation of systematic violations of the Act was made in the
Complaint, the court has no jurisdiction to hear the associated claims.
[4] The first cause of action is dismissed.
II. Amendment to Summons
[5] Defendants are directed to make answer to the Complaint limited to the second
cause of action only.
Dated at the City of Palmer, in the State of Ridgeway this 22nd day of January, 2023.
“koala4Iife”
Judge koala4Iife
Counsel for the plaintiff 9syn9: Arthur_Chen and BobFogarty, Ridgeway.
Counsel for the defendants SOURCED_V, MatthewSandringham, and
insertreality: totoro987123, Ridgeway.
Document record
File size
114.1 KB
Uploaded
Jan 20, 2023 12:00 PM
Filed
Jan 20, 2023 12:00 PM
Filing code
COMPLAINT
Uploaded by
9syn9
Notes
MotionRuling_RSC-CV-880_2350-012223.pdf — archived from the Trello docket (https://trello.com/c/2OirM0AP)
