Rendered from the court's authenticated repository
Searchable full text
2,687 characters extracted
—
STATE OF RIDGEWAY
EPIDERMISGUPTA69
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
DOCKET NO. RSC-CV-841
JUDGE. HON. koala4life
ANSWER
Plaintiff
v.
BETATHEWOLFGAMER
Defendant
ANSWER
PARTIES
1. Defendant admits.
2. Defendant admits to the extent that the defendant was an officer on duty. Defendant
disputes any tortious conduct occurred.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
3. Admits the allegation in paragraph 15. This court has jurisdiction to hear this claim.
4. Admits the allegation in paragraph 16. The venue is proper.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
5. Defendant admits.
6. Defendant admits.
7. Defendant admits.
8. Defendant denies.
9. Plaintiffs’ allegation in paragraph 9 is a conclusion of law to which no response is
required.
10. Plaintiffs’ allegation in paragraph 10 is a conclusion of law to which no response is
required. To the extent that paragraph 10 makes factual allegations, they are denied.
11. Plaintiffs’ allegation in paragraph 11 is a conclusion of law to which no response is
required.
12. Plaintiffs’ allegation in paragraph 12 contains conclusions of law to which no response is
required. Defendant admits that the plaintiff was detained.
13. Defendant denies.
14. Defendant admits.
15. Defendant admits.
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
16. DISMISSED
17. DISMISSED
18. DISMISSED
19. DISMISSED
20. DISMISSED
21. DISMISSED
22. DISMISSED
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
23. In reference to paragraph 23, denies all prior allegations not otherwise admitted.
24. Defendant admits.
25. Plaintiffs’ allegation in paragraph 25 is a conclusion of law to which no response is
required.
26. Plaintiffs’ allegation in paragraph 26 is a conclusion of law to which no response is
required.
27. Plaintiffs’ allegation in paragraph 27 is a conclusion of law to which no response is
required.
THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
28. In reference to paragraph 23, denies all prior allegations not otherwise admitted.
29. Plaintiffs’ allegation in paragraph 29 is a conclusion of law to which no response is
required.
30. Plaintiffs’ allegation in paragraph 30 is a conclusion of law to which no response is
required.
31. Plaintiffs’ allegation in paragraph 31 is a conclusion of law to which no response is
required.
32. Plaintiffs’ allegation in paragraph 32 is a conclusion of law to which no response is
required.
33. Plaintiffs’ allegation in paragraph 33 is a conclusion of law to which no response is
required.
34. Plaintiffs’ allegation in paragraph 34 is a conclusion of law to which no response is
required.
35. Defendant denies that the entry is unlawful.
36. Plaintiffs’ allegation in paragraph 36 is a conclusion of law to which no response is
required.
/s/ totoro987123
Solicitor General
Department of Justice
Counsel of Record
Dated: 02/08/2023
Document record
File size
762.9 KB
Uploaded
Jan 2, 2023 12:00 PM
Filed
Jan 2, 2023 12:00 PM
Filing code
COMPLAINT
Uploaded by
epidermisgupta69
Notes
Answer, RSC-CV-841.pdf — archived from the Trello docket (https://trello.com/c/lYkH6kWo)
