Rendered from the court's authenticated repository
Searchable full text
2,375 characters extracted
—
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
XLAZERIFY,
Plaintiff,
v.
STUDSPERSECOND,
Defendant.
Case No. RSC-CV-832
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
COMES NOW the Defendant, StudsPerSecond, as a named defendant and corporation
within the State of Ridgeway, in answer to the Plaintiffs Complaint, admits, denies, and alleges as
follows:
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. Defendant denies all allegations contained within the complaint unless specified within
this document.
2. Defendant admits paragraph 1 of the Plaintiff’s complaint in full.
3. Defendant admits paragraph 2 of the Plaintiff's complaint in full.
4. Defendant admits the allegations in Paragraph 3 of the Plaintiff’s Complaint.
5. Defendant admits the allegations in Paragraph 4 of the Plaintiff’s Complaint.
6. Defendant admits the allegations in Paragraph 5 of the civil complaint.
7. Defendant admits the allegations in Paragraph 6 of the civil complaint insofar as the
General Manager contacting the Plaintiff about his activity. There was no lashing out.
8. Defendant admits the allegations in Paragraph 7 of the civil complaint, but asserts that the
Plaintiff neglected his important duties.
9. Defendant admits Paragraph 9 of the civil complaint.
10. Defendant admits the allegations in Paragraph 9 of the civil complaint insofar as the
activity log requirement for members of Human Resources. Individuals within the
department are expected to maintain a reasonable level of activity with relation to their
specific duties, including members of Human Resources.
11. Defendant admits the allegations in Paragraph 10 of the civil complaint, but asserts that
this policy is not intended to prevent the injuries alleged.
12. Defendant admits the allegations contained within Paragraph 11.
13. Defendant denies the legal conclusion/allegation within Paragraph 12. The statute alleged
breached is not designed to prevent the alleged injury.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. Defendant and admits that Ridgeway County is the proper venue for the shit.
PARTIES
1. Admitted.
2. Admitted.
1. Defendant denies that the Plaintiff is entitled to any relief and contests all claims therein.
2. Defendant further asserts that an injunction is not statutorily allowed and therefore may
not be granted by this Court.
Dated: January 1, 2023 Respectfully Submitted.
STICKZA
General Counsel
STUDSPERSECOND
HolyRomanRyan
Attorney At Law
Counsel for Defendant
Document record
File size
59.7 KB
Uploaded
Dec 30, 2022 12:00 PM
Filed
Dec 30, 2022 12:00 PM
Filing code
COMPLAINT
Uploaded by
xlazerify
Notes
Response.pdf — archived from the Trello docket (https://trello.com/c/unDFBGHA)