STATE OF RIDGEWAY
reachmasterable
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
DOCKET NO. 0000-00000Z
Plaintiff
v.
iiCald_Lawii
Defendant
RESPONSE TO THE CIVIL COMPLAINT
1. Admitted
2. Admitted insofar as the Defendant appeared at the bloxmart that the Plaintiff was at. The
Plaintiff was not followed in any way, shape, or form by the Defendant, as is insinuated by the
wording.
3. Admitted
4. Denied; the weapon the Defendant brandished was not pointed in towards the Plaintiff in any
way that would result in a fear or bodily apprehension or offensive contact.
a. And even if this contact occurred, it was not intentional. The Defendant only wished to
kill the cop.
5. Admitted insofar as the Plaintiff drawing his weapon. The Plaintiff pointed his weapon after the
Defendant had killed the Officer, when there was no threat to the Plaintiff based on the actions of
the Defendant.
6. Admitted; though it is contended that the Defendant still had reasonable fear of grievous bodily
injury, constituting self defense.
7. Admitted insofar as the Defendant shooting the Plaintiff. At no point was the weapon directly
brandished towards the Plaintiff; instead, the Defendant merely ran in circles with the barrel of
the gun pointed away from the Plaintiff.
8. Admitted, insofar as the taking of the ammunition and weapon. There was no stealing of
property, for the Plaintiff was already dead when the incident had occurred; therefore the
property was not “personal”.
9. Admitted
10. Admitted
11. Admitted
12. Admitted
13. Admitted
14. See Para. 1-8.
15. Denied; the Wesler shotgun was not “intentionally pointed” at the Plaintiff, the Defendant was
acting in such a manner that, while dangerous, was not intention.
16. See Para. 1-8/15. (Denied)
17. See Para. 1-8 and 15-16.
18. Admitted insofar as the death of the Plaintiff. This killing, however, was done in self defense,
and self defense is a legal justification.
a. It is submitted that self defense requires a reasonable fear of bodily injury, which is a
question of fact.
19. See Para. 1-8, 15-16, 18.
20. Admitted insofar as the taking of the ammo and weapon, though this was not ‘personal property’
of the Plaintiff.
21. Defendant contests all claims of relief as set forth in para. 22, 23, and 24 (denoted as 21 in the
Civil Complaint), and contends that the Plaintiff is not entitled to any relief.
Respectfully Submitted,
Defendant IICald_LawII
By their Attorneys,
/s/ Holy R. Ryan
HolyRomanRyan, RSB#17105
