Rendered from the court's authenticated repository
Searchable full text
1,495 characters extracted
—
STATE OF RIDGEWAY
TR33SINTHEW00DS,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
DOCKET NO. RSC-CV-718
PRESIDING JUDGE: HON. KOALA
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
Plaintiff
v.
ISPILLEDMYTACOS, ET. AL.,
Defendant
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
Comes now the Defendant, ISpilledMyTacos, by and through the undersigned counsel, hereby
answering the civil complaint brought forth against them.
GENERAL DENIAL
Unless expressly admitted below, the Defendant(s) denies each and every allegation that the Plaintiff has
brought forth in their Complaint.
INTRODUCTION
1. Admitted.
2. Admitted.
3. Admitted.
4. Admitted.
5. Admitted.
6. Denied. Both parties assert this occurred at Palmer Tunnel, as well as the vehicle did not yield.
7. Admitted in part, denied in part. The RCSO Executor was desynced into the vehicle, which
caused the accident.
8. Admitted.
9. Admitted.
10. Admitted in part, denied in part. Both defendants affirm they conducted a standard arrest on the
individual.
11. Admitted.
12. Admitted.
13. Admitted.
14. Admitted.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
15. Admitted
16. Admitted
PARTIES
17. Admitted.
18. Admitted.
19. Admitted.
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
30. Denied. The Defendant asserts that a standard arrest which was in-line with the operating
procedures and regulations relating to the Use of Force Continuum was conducted.
31. Admitted.
RELIEF
The Defendants assert that the Plaintiff is not entitled to any relief.
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/RyanJSyndicate
RyanJSyndicate
Solicitor General; Office of the Solicitor
General
R.W. Bar #18106
Document record
File size
90.3 KB
Uploaded
Oct 25, 2022 12:00 PM
Filed
Oct 25, 2022 12:00 PM
Filing code
COMPLAINT
Uploaded by
tr33sinthew00ds
Notes
RSC-CV-718- answer.pdf — archived from the Trello docket (https://trello.com/c/4byNIDSl)
