SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
TR33SINTHEW00DS,
Plaintiff,
v.
No. RSC-CV-718
ISPILLEDMYTACOS & TACTICALGRUNTS
Defendants.
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, tr33sinthew00ds hereby brings this civil action and alleges as
follows–
INTRODUCTION
1. On October 22nd, Plaintiff (hereinafter tr33s) was driving their Lancelot Taxi
on Belgrade Road.
2. tr33s was driving their Lancelot Taxi with respect to road laws.
3. A Ridgeway County Sheriff's Office (hereinafter RCSO) Executor was
driving down Alderpoint Road going north, with emergency lights on. The
driver was one of the defendants, ISpilledMyTacos. ISpilledMyTacos was in
RCSO: Special Response Team uniform & gear. The passenger of the
Executor was one of the defendants, TacticalGrunts, who was wearing
standard department uniform & equipment.
4. However, that same RCSO Executor did not have their sirens activated.
5. The RCSO Executor was driving at its top speed.
6. tr33s spotted the RCSO Executor and turned into Alderpoint, thinking there
was enough distance for him to yield to the Executor.
7. The RCSO Executor and Lancelot Taxi collided into each other, disrupting
the direction of the RCSO Executor severely, meanwhile the Lancelot Taxi
had minimal directional disruption.
8. The RCSO Executor changed course and charged into the Lancelot Taxi.
9. Two occupants inside of the RCSO Executor got out. The aforementioned
occupants were ISpilledMyTacos and TacticalGrunts.
10.Both occupants pulled me out of my Lancelot Taxi. Upon being successfully
dragged out, one of the deputies unnecessarily utilized their taser on me
(needs confirmation in testimony), then put me in handcuffs. tr33s was not
resisting the deputies.
11.During detainment, one of the occupants was alerted of a search warrant
issued on tr33s. I was promptly taken to the RCSO headquarters on Belgrade
Road to execute said warrant.
12.Another deputy of the RCSO: Special Response Team, bl4eedcity (non-party)
executed the search warrant. I asked why I was taken into detainment for the
first place and the reason for my detainment to ISpilledMyTacos and
bl4eedcity. No response was given.
13.bl4eedcity arrested me for Unlawful Possession of Police-Grade Equipment
with Intent to Sell after successful execution on the search warrant.
14.I was given a search warrant receipt.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to Article V, Section IV of the
Constitution of the State of Ridgeway.
2. Venue is proper in this Court because the incident took place within
Ridgeway County.
PARTIES
1. Plaintiff tr33sinthew00ds is a resident of the State of Ridgeway.
2. Defendant ISpilledMyTacos is the Sheriff of the Ridgeway County Sheriff's
Office, and is being sued in their individual and official capacity.
3. Defendant TacticalGrunts is a deputy within the RCSO, and is being sued
in their individual and official capacity.
COMPLAINT - 1
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
(Official Misconduct - RCSO Handbook Title III, Section 303)
1. This tort has been alleged because of the excessive use of force by the
defendants after the collision.
2. This tort is to all defendants listed.
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
(5 R. Stat. § 202 - Battery)
1. This tort has been alleged because of the excessive use of force by the
defendants after the collision. This tort has also been alleged because of
the collision itself.
2. This tort applies to both defendants.
THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
(5 R. Stat. § 205 - Negligence)
1. This tort has been alleged because of the lack of care when driving the
RCSO Executor without proper precautions (ex. slowing down next to
intersections, using sirens, etc.). This lack of care can be seen as illegal
under the criminal offense Unsafe Operation of an Emergency Vehicle
(Title 7. §7.16 of the Ridgeway State Vehicle Code), and
2. This tort only applies to the defendant ISpilledMyTacos.
FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION
(5 R. Stat. § 206 - Negligence per se)
1. This tort has been alleged because of the lack of care when driving the RCSO
Executor without proper precautions (ex. slowing down next to intersections,
using sirens, etc.). This negligence violates Title III §3.02 of the RCSO Code
of Conduct and Title III. § 504, 4.1b & Title III. § 504, 4.1c of the RCSO
Handbook.
FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION
(5 R. Stat. § 204 - False Imprisonment)
1. This tort has been alleged due to the detainment of tr33s. The reason
for the detainment–besides the search warrant–was not stated by both
defendants. The reason as to why this is false imprisonment will be
argued during trial.
2. This tort applies to all defendants.
COMPLAINT - 2
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
Wherefore, Plaintiff prays that the Court–
ON THE FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
1. That the defendants be subject to disciplinary action in the RCSO.
2. That tr33s will be paid $50.
ON THE SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
1. That the defendants be subject to disciplinary action in the RCSO.
2. That tr33s will be paid $250.
ON THE THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
1. That the defendants be subject to disciplinary action in the RCSO.
2. That tr33s will be paid $250.
COMPLAINT - 3
ON THE FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION
1. That the defendants be subject to disciplinary action in the RCSO.
2. That tr33s will be paid $250.
ON THE FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION
1. That the defendants be subject to disciplinary action in the RCSO.
2. That tr33s will be paid $250.
Respectfully submitted.
Dated: 10/28/2022 Ridgeway
tr33sinthew00ds
COMPLAINT - 4
