Rendered from the court's authenticated repository
Searchable full text
1,269 characters extracted
—
SUPERIOR COURT
STATE OF RIDGEWAY
STATE OF RIDGEWAY
DOCKET NO. RSC-CM-821
STATES RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR
BILL OF PARTICULARS
Plaintiff
v.
XJVMMA
Defendant
I. CLARIFICATION AS TO COUNT’S TWO AND THREE
During both instances, the defendant was actively discharging her duties of executing the
active enforcement of State Laws and Statues within the City of Palmer; with the trust afforded
to her by the residents of the State of Ridgway, State Legislature, and Executive Branch of the
State. The actions undertaken by the defendant were directly related to the office she holds
within the Palmer Police Department. The discharge of her firearm in both instances were
unauthorized exercises of this duty, whereas prescribed by the Law Enforcement Training
Center, as well as the Palmer Police Department Training Unit; due to the simple fact that there
was no lawful basis for the firearm to be discharged. These duties are clearly inherent in nature
as a requirement pursuant to § 6.06 of the Ridgeway Criminal Code.
II. CLARIFICATION TO THE LOCATION OF COUNT THREE
The action that is described in count three took place on the sidewalk near Tom’s
Takeout; as listed in count one.
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/
JOSH LOCKE
STATE ATTORNEY
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
COUNSEL OF RECORD
Document record
File size
83.8 KB
Uploaded
Sep 3, 2022 12:00 PM
Filed
Sep 3, 2022 12:00 PM
Filing code
CRIMINAL_COMPLAINT
Uploaded by
state of ridgeway
Notes
RSC-CM-821; Response to MBP.pdf — archived from the Trello docket (https://trello.com/c/kohWyfqK)
